On Jo, 16 ian 20, 10:15:59, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 05:09:36PM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Well, 'apt upgrade' is not allowed to install new packages anyway,
>
> Actually, it is. You're thinking of apt-get.
Ugh, right. Thanks for the correction.
Kind regards,
Andrei
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 05:09:36PM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Well, 'apt upgrade' is not allowed to install new packages anyway,
Actually, it is. You're thinking of apt-get.
On Jo, 16 ian 20, 08:22:53, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2020-01-16 at 04:38, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > This should work with the same technique used for backports: pin
> > unstable to priority 100 (the same priority as installed packages).
> >
> > New packages must be installed with '-t sid', a
On 2020-01-16 at 04:38, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 15 ian 20, 12:12:53, Samuel Henrique wrote:
>
>> Hello people,
>>
>> These days I'm wondering what's the correct approach to have the
>> following behaviour:
>>
>> * Using Testing
>> * Always install firefox (or some other packages) and its
On Mi, 15 ian 20, 12:12:53, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> Hello people,
>
> These days I'm wondering what's the correct approach to have the
> following behaviour:
>
> * Using Testing
> * Always install firefox (or some other packages) and its deps from the
> unstable repository
> * Keep downloading u
Hello people,
These days I'm wondering what's the correct approach to have the
following behaviour:
* Using Testing
* Always install firefox (or some other packages) and its deps from the
unstable repository
* Keep downloading upgrades of these packages from unstable
* Don't install anything else
6 matches
Mail list logo
