Re: [Way off topic] depleted uranium

2005-01-04 Thread Christopher Judd
On 3 Jan, Ron Johnson wrote: > [snip] >> Wrong. Natural uranium is >99% U238, with trace amounts of U235 >> and U235. The latter two species have much higher specific activities, >> which is why they are useful for reactors/bombs. Depleted uranium is >> what's left over after the U235 a

Re: [Way off topic] depleted uranium

2005-01-03 Thread Wim De Smet
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 15:37:17 -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 10:13 -0500, Christopher Judd wrote: > > On 29 Dec, dorn hetzel wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 09:48:56AM -0800, bandito wrote: > > >> i think they'd be used more as an environmental contaminant

Re: [Way off topic] depleted uranium

2005-01-03 Thread Ron Johnson
On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 10:01 -0500, Christopher Judd wrote: > On 29 Dec, David Raleigh Arnold wrote: > > On Tuesday 28 December 2004 08:28 pm, Sam Watkins wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 02:46:33PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: [snip] > Wrong. Natural uranium is >99% U238, with trace amounts of

Re: [Way off topic] depleted uranium

2005-01-03 Thread Ron Johnson
On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 10:13 -0500, Christopher Judd wrote: > On 29 Dec, dorn hetzel wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 09:48:56AM -0800, bandito wrote: > >> i think they'd be used more as an environmental contaminant than > >> something intended to actually cause death... setting off a big one in a

Re: [Way off topic] depleted uranium

2005-01-03 Thread Christopher Judd
On 29 Dec, dorn hetzel wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 09:48:56AM -0800, bandito wrote: >> i think they'd be used more as an environmental contaminant than >> something intended to actually cause death... setting off a big one in a >> city wouldnt kill THAT many people, but it'd keep them out of t

Re: [Way off topic] depleted uranium

2005-01-03 Thread Christopher Judd
On 29 Dec, David Raleigh Arnold wrote: > On Tuesday 28 December 2004 08:28 pm, Sam Watkins wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 02:46:33PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: >> > >The worst "terrorist" is America, with your depleted uranium >> > >"dirty-bombs" which you throw around at every opportunity, > > A

Re: [Way off topic] depleted uranium

2004-12-29 Thread bandito
agreed, the intended effect of DU rounds versus dirty bombs are quite different. but while it certainly may be easier to clean up than other more common contaminants, i think the people who live in the areas where we're firing this stuff are pretty content to let it sit there and have their kids mu

Re: [Way off topic] depleted uranium

2004-12-29 Thread dorn hetzel
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 09:48:56AM -0800, bandito wrote: > i think they'd be used more as an environmental contaminant than > something intended to actually cause death... setting off a big one in a > city wouldnt kill THAT many people, but it'd keep them out of the > contaminated area until the ra

Re: [Way off topic] depleted uranium

2004-12-29 Thread bandito
i think they'd be used more as an environmental contaminant than something intended to actually cause death... setting off a big one in a city wouldnt kill THAT many people, but it'd keep them out of the contaminated area until the radioactive material was cleaned up (or a few millions years passes

Re: [Way off topic] depleted uranium

2004-12-29 Thread Brendan
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 22:47, Ron Johnson wrote: > What's as effective as DU at piercing modern armor? This was my question as well. I mean, DU is so damn heavy, and that's what makes it amazing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont

Re: [Way off topic] depleted uranium

2004-12-29 Thread David Raleigh Arnold
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 08:28 pm, Sam Watkins wrote: > On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 02:46:33PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: > > >The worst "terrorist" is America, with your depleted uranium > > >"dirty-bombs" which you throw around at every opportunity, A dirty bomb is a nuclear device designed to kill

Re: [Way off topic] depleted uranium

2004-12-28 Thread Ron Johnson
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 22:08 -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > Sam Watkins wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 02:46:33PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: > > > >>>The worst "terrorist" is America, with your depleted uranium > >>>"dirty-bombs" which you throw around at every opportunity, > >> > >>Cite? Ou

Re: [Way off topic] depleted uranium

2004-12-28 Thread Roberto Sanchez
Sam Watkins wrote: On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 02:46:33PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: The worst "terrorist" is America, with your depleted uranium "dirty-bombs" which you throw around at every opportunity, Cite? Outside of Hiroshima and Nagasaki I don't recall a detonation of any atomic or nuclear

Re: [Way off topic] depleted uranium

2004-12-28 Thread Sam Watkins
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 02:46:33PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: > >The worst "terrorist" is America, with your depleted uranium > >"dirty-bombs" which you throw around at every opportunity, > > Cite? Outside of Hiroshima and Nagasaki I don't recall a > detonation of any atomic or nuclear dev