On Fri, 30 Apr 1999, bradleyb wrote:
> I don't believe there is an SMB client for DOS or Win3x... There would be
> if M$ had any respect for their customer base, but
> If you have Windows for Workgroups available, I believe that can act as an
> SMB client.
> As for dos, I would suggest looking
Yes, I have been corrected in this respect. Sorry for the
inadvertent FUD.
-Brad
On Fri, 30 Apr 1999, Jeremiah Johnson wrote:
> Windows for Workgroups has SMB clients packaged in, but DOS does not.
> There ARE dos clients packaged with Windows NT Server, however. I'm no
> fan of windows, and I
Windows for Workgroups has SMB clients packaged in, but DOS does not.
There ARE dos clients packaged with Windows NT Server, however. I'm no
fan of windows, and I am not defending it, I just believe in giving
correct information whenever possible.
-Jeremiah Johnson
On Fri, 30 Apr 1999, bradleyb
gt;
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/30/99 09:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bcc: Jean L Francois)
> Subject: Re: [THNXS]&[Q]: SMB client for Dos/win3.11
>
> I don't believe there is an SMB client for DOS or Win3x... There would be
>
The clients to do SMB for DOS and multiple win and os/2:
ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/bussys/Clients/
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/30/99 09:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bcc: Jean L Francois)
Subject:Re: [THNXS]&[Q]: SMB client for Dos/win3.11
I d
I don't believe there is an SMB client for DOS or Win3x... There would be
if M$ had any respect for their customer base, but
If you have Windows for Workgroups available, I believe that can act as an
SMB client.
As for dos, I would suggest looking into NCP, i.e. the NetWare protocol.
You could
Hi!
First of all, thanks to all those who guided me into the depths of
installing Linux into an archaic i386 with only 40 megs hard drive. This has
been accomplished, and it is now acting as a printer server).
My question is: it's easy enough to connect a win 95/8 machine to
this
7 matches
Mail list logo
