Re: [OT] sqlite-amalgamation

2008-04-03 Thread s. keeling
Amit Uttamchandani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:16:57 +0530 > "sabarish balagopal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I just downloaded the source tarball, un-tar'ed and unzipped, did a > > "./configure && make". That left me with a "sqlite3" executable. I didn't > > had slightest

Re: [OT] sqlite-amalgamation

2008-04-03 Thread Amit Uttamchandani
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:16:57 +0530 "sabarish balagopal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just downloaded the source tarball, un-tar'ed and unzipped, did a > "./configure && make". That left me with a "sqlite3" executable. I didn't > had slightest of problem doing this. > > So if you can elaborate wh

Re: [OT] sqlite-amalgamation

2008-04-03 Thread Martin Marcher
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Amit Uttamchandani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I am currently evaluating the use of sqlite3 to store application data from > a python application that I am writing. > > I am using Debian Etch so some of the packages are out of date and thus I >

Re: [OT] sqlite-amalgamation

2008-04-03 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/03/08 02:19, Amit Uttamchandani wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I am currently evaluating the use of sqlite3 to store application > data from a python application that I am writing. > > I am using Debian Etch so some of the packages are out of date

[OT] sqlite-amalgamation

2008-04-03 Thread Amit Uttamchandani
Hey everyone, I am currently evaluating the use of sqlite3 to store application data from a python application that I am writing. I am using Debian Etch so some of the packages are out of date and thus I decided to compile them from source. Python 2.5.2 was fairly straightforward to compile an