Re: [OT] sorry, bad url reference

2012-03-05 Thread Chris Bannister
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:36:24PM -0500, Randy Kramer wrote: > On Sunday 04 March 2012 11:40:56 am Chris Bannister wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:30:13AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: > > > [1] http://thescreamonline.com/essays/essays08-01/basically.html > > > > That URL produces "406 Not A

Re: [OT] sorry, bad url reference

2012-03-04 Thread Randy Kramer
On Sunday 04 March 2012 11:40:56 am Chris Bannister wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:30:13AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: > > [1] http://thescreamonline.com/essays/essays08-01/basically.html > > That URL produces "406 Not Acceptable". Not sure why I included that > link without checking it firs

[OT] sorry, bad url reference

2012-03-04 Thread Chris Bannister
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:30:13AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: > Have a look at: > http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20101017091521AAqPonZ oops, probably not the best reference since some of the posts use bad English. > Basically[1], the answer is: > No, grammar is an uncountable n