Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
After 28 months with Mexican Prodigy switched to Mexican AT&T.
The latest *scientific* results are in from the comparison between AT&T
and Prodigy ISP's in Mexico:
I know you are waiting with baited breath for more *scientific* results:
AT&T Me
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
After 28 months with Mexican Prodigy switched to Mexican AT&T.
The latest *scientific* results are in from the comparison between AT&T
and Prodigy ISP's in Mexico:
1. Prodigy will cut off any session lasting more than 8:00 hours at
exactly 8 hours. I thought it was Telm
On 4. December 2003 at 7:21PM -0600,
Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> So I have a question: does anybody know of a way to compare ISP
> performances?
My simple method involves downloading an actual file, preferably
a file that won't shrink too much when gzipped (e.g. Debian
pac
You can try www.dslreports.com. May have your isp listed there..
Lee
At 01:21 AM 12/5/2003, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
After 28 months with Mexican Prodigy switched to Mexican AT&T.
It was the worst service ever: almost every day at least one hangup,
frequent DSN lookup hangs, frequent nothing-at
After 28 months with Mexican Prodigy switched to Mexican AT&T.
It was the worst service ever: almost every day at least one hangup,
frequent DSN lookup hangs, frequent nothing-at-alls.
But... I should not complain because I paid for only 12 months...
which is a symbol of the organization.
So I
5 matches
Mail list logo