Re: [OT] The decline and fall of Google Groups

2004-12-19 Thread Cláudio E. Elicker
On Saturday 18 December 2004 14:44, Andy Firman wrote: > On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 02:24:13AM -0500, William Ballard wrote: > > Google's becoming evil. > > > > Not only have they screwed up groups layout, showing a few columns of > > text and leaving a big space for ads, now they're pimping their own

Re: [OT] The decline and fall of Google Groups

2004-12-18 Thread Paul Stolp
* Andy Firman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-12-18 08:58]: > This is one good resource for me: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/ I'll look into this. Thanks. > Since Google groups sucks for finding answers now, what else is everyone > using? http://groups.google.ca/ (at least until this loophole gets

Re: [OT] The decline and fall of Google Groups

2004-12-18 Thread Andy Firman
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 02:24:13AM -0500, William Ballard wrote: > Google's becoming evil. > > Not only have they screwed up groups layout, showing a few columns of > text and leaving a big space for ads, now they're pimping their own > group namespace beside usenet. > > It's horrible. I agree

Re: [OT] The decline and fall of Google Groups

2004-12-02 Thread Alex Malinovich
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 02:24 -0500, William Ballard wrote: > Google's becoming evil. > > Not only have they screwed up groups layout, showing a few columns of > text and leaving a big space for ads, now they're pimping their own > group namespace beside usenet. > > It's horrible. > > Is there a

[OT] The decline and fall of Google Groups

2004-12-01 Thread William Ballard
Google's becoming evil. Not only have they screwed up groups layout, showing a few columns of text and leaving a big space for ads, now they're pimping their own group namespace beside usenet. It's horrible. Is there any other usenet archive? I'm getting sick of the things Google's doing (put