On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:05:32AM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:13:32PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> > So... you're not interested in my bridge for sale?
>
> If he buys your bridge, how will you chew your food?
that's what the kids are for!!
A
sig
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 01:11:37AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 05/30/07 23:12, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 06:06:43PM -0400, Andrew J. Barr wrote:
> >>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >>Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >>On Tue, 29 May 2007 13:21:32 -0700
> >>Andrew Sackville-We
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:13:32PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> So... you're not interested in my bridge for sale?
If he buys your bridge, how will you chew your food?
Doug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
On 05/30/07 23:12, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:48:34AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 05/29/07 21:08, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:21:32PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:34:00AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
The new one
On 05/30/07 23:12, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 06:06:43PM -0400, Andrew J. Barr wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 29 May 2007 13:21:32 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
maybe I'm getting too old (don't trust anyone over 30
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:19:51AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:52:03PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> >>On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:34:00AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >>>On 05/21/07 07:30, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> >> >
> Go
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 06:06:43PM -0400, Andrew J. Barr wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 29 May 2007 13:21:32 -0700
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > maybe I'm getting too old (don't trust anyone over 30!),
>
> I'm 22...
like I said...
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:48:34AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 05/29/07 21:08, Chris Bannister wrote:
> >On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:21:32PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >>>On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:34:00AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >>>The new one didn't have the same capabilites and
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:52:03PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:34:00AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 05/21/07 07:30, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>
Good reason to have a big case. With the CM-Stacker, the PSU can be
removed from eit
On 05/29/07 21:08, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:21:32PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:34:00AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
The new one didn't have the same capabilites and cost more. The new one
seems to be designed for the modern gamer with cl
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:21:32PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:34:00AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > The new one didn't have the same capabilites and cost more. The new one
> > seems to be designed for the modern gamer with clear side panel so your
> > MB coo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 29 May 2007 13:21:32 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> maybe I'm getting too old (don't trust anyone over 30!),
I'm 22...
> but WTF is
> the point? Does one somehow play better if there are cool lights
> inside the cas
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:52:03PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:34:00AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On 05/21/07 07:30, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> >
> > >Good reason to have a big case. With the CM-Stacker, the PSU can be
> > >removed from either the inside, o
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:34:00AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 05/21/07 07:30, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>
> >Good reason to have a big case. With the CM-Stacker, the PSU can be
> >removed from either the inside, or more conveniently, from the rear
> >(once you unplug all the cables))); no ne
On 05/21/07 07:30, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 09:19:27PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 05:42:56PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 05:35:27PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:00:23PM -0700, A
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 08:30:40AM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>
> Good reason to have a big case. With the CM-Stacker, the PSU can be
> removed from either the inside, or more conveniently, from the rear
> (once you unplug all the cables))); no need to remove anything else.
>
Yeah. It
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 10:31:30PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 05:35:27PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > Is the PSU really more failure prone than any other component?
>
> it is my understanding, having long ago lost the source, that the PSU
> is the *most*
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 09:19:27PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 05:42:56PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 05:35:27PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:00:23PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > > > On
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 05:35:27PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:00:23PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 04:02:29PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > >
> > > My _first_ consideration (other than not going bankrupt) was longevity,
* Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-20 17:42:56 -0400]:
> No, but if it goes, it can take the whole thing with it. If it goes
> slightly, its a PITA to track down. Why dither? Keep it cool.
I've set a laptop in a refrigerator in order to get a critical backup
off a failing drive
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 05:42:56PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 05:35:27PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:00:23PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 04:02:29PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> >
> > I
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 05:35:27PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:00:23PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 04:02:29PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>
> Is the PSU really more failure prone than any other component?
>
No, but if it
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:00:23PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 04:02:29PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> >
> > My _first_ consideration (other than not going bankrupt) was longevity,
> > hense the huge case, PSU in bottom bay, and lots of fans. Good reliable
23 matches
Mail list logo
