On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 14:56 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 09 May 2012 23:22:09 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 20:22 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> >> What is what you understand by "dirty"?
> >>
> >> I can send the same spam, virus-inside or crap message with a signature
>
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 20:22 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 09 May 2012 19:33:52 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 17:26 +, Camaleón wrote:
> >> Exactly. For instance, those who think that PGP signed messages will
> >> improve security when reading/posting e-mails >;-)
>
On Wed, 09 May 2012 19:33:52 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 17:26 +, Camaleón wrote:
>> Exactly. For instance, those who think that PGP signed messages will
>> improve security when reading/posting e-mails >;-)
>
> AFAIK a signed message can't become dirty.
What is what
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 17:26 +, Camaleón wrote:
> Exactly. For instance, those who think that PGP signed messages will
> improve security when reading/posting e-mails >;-)
AFAIK a signed message can't become dirty. So it's secure that nobody
add a word, removed a word or completely edited the
On Wed, 09 May 2012 13:32:12 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> If this discussion can't be stopped, than perhaps we can make it a
> useful thread, by not talking about how to behave or not to behave on a
> mailing list, by not talking about if we won't signed emails or not.
(...)
> If you really need
5 matches
Mail list logo
