On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 03:35:38 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 15:27 +, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 01:35:40 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
>> > * Do not send "test" messages to determine whether your mail client
>> > is working.
>>
>> Shouldn't be (or "wouldn't be n
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 03:35:38AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 15:27 +, Camaleón wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 01:35:40 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > * Do not send "test" messages to determine whether your mail client is
> > > working.
> >
> > Shouldn't be (or "wou
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 15:27 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 01:35:40 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > * Do not send "test" messages to determine whether your mail client is
> > working.
>
> Shouldn't be (or "wouldn't be nice to have", I don't want to sound too
> agressive) a dedicate
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 20:14 +0100, Brian wrote:
> I'd suggest vgui-discuss as a suitable test-bed. Or debian-devel for
> living dangerously. :)
How about LKML? Not only for tests, but also for microblogging with
links to Facebook, Twitter and last but not least LinkIn.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:14:13 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Thu 12 Jul 2012 at 10:22:19 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
>> Camaleón wrote:
>> > Shouldn't be (or "wouldn't be nice to have", I don't want to sound
>> > too agressive) a dedicated mailing list for this purpose? I mean, for
>> > testing how messa
On 20120712_102219, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
> > Shouldn't be (or "wouldn't be nice to have", I don't want to sound too
> > agressive) a dedicated mailing list for this purpose? I mean, for testing
> > how messages will appear before getting into the real "dangerous jungle"
> > and do
On Thu 12 Jul 2012 at 10:22:19 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
> > Shouldn't be (or "wouldn't be nice to have", I don't want to sound too
> > agressive) a dedicated mailing list for this purpose? I mean, for testing
> > how messages will appear before getting into the real "dangerous
Camaleón wrote:
> Shouldn't be (or "wouldn't be nice to have", I don't want to sound too
> agressive) a dedicated mailing list for this purpose? I mean, for testing
> how messages will appear before getting into the real "dangerous jungle"
> and don't disturbing "the beasts" (groaar!) :-)
That
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 01:35:40 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> David Baron wrote:
>> To see if proper titles and headers are now coming through (one can
>> always hope).
>
> Please see the Debian mailing list code of conduct.
>
> http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
>
> Specifically thi
9 matches
Mail list logo
