On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:46:24 -0400, neo haux wrote:
>
:-P
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.09.29.12.51...@gmail
On Qui, 27 Jan 2011, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
In , shawn
wilson wrote:
Congratulations, you just hijacked a thread.
When people use subjects like 'help', 'debian', etc, that might happen. Not
more his fault than the OP that used the same bad subject.
Thread hijacking is not based on t
In , shawn
wilson wrote:
>> Congratulations, you just hijacked a thread.
>
>When people use subjects like 'help', 'debian', etc, that might happen. Not
>more his fault than the OP that used the same bad subject.
Thread hijacking is not based on the Subject header, but rather the In-Reply-
To and
> Congratulations, you just hijacked a thread.
>
When people use subjects like 'help', 'debian', etc, that might happen. Not
more his fault than the OP that used the same bad subject.
In <20110114120047.ga7...@hysteria.proulx.com>, Bob Proulx wrote:
>Adrian Levi wrote:
>> zparameters="a -mhe=on -pd1ckhead -t7z -m0=lzma -mx=9 -mfb=64 -md=32m
>> -ms=on -si" zfilename="Daily Backup - $(date +"%a %h %H%M
>> %d-%m-%Y").$backuplevel.tar.7z"
>
>Yuck! Look at all of those spaces in the
In <4d303ac4.2020...@chello.at>, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
>On 14.01.2011 11:37, Adrian Levi wrote:
>> I have (hopefully) taken on everybody's suggestions, Here is the
>> current script :)
>>
>>
>> #!/bin/sh
>>
>> # Variables:
>> # Determine backup level
>> incrementalfile="/srv/tar_incremental_file
No real help here, just some general comments. First, don't cd in a script.
Use full paths - this includes defining paths to your programs (if you or
someone else put a different program with the same name that is found
earlier in your path, your script is liable to cause a big mess). Bash is
nice
On 14.01.2011 12:50, Adrian Levi wrote:
I know where the error lies but not how to fix it.
zparameters="a -mhe=on -pd1ckhead -t7z -m0=lzma -mx=9 -mfb=64 -md=32m
-ms=on -si"
zfilename="Daily Backup - $(date +"%a %h %H%M %d-%m-%Y").$backuplevel.tar.7z"
When these two expand here:
tar $tarparamet
On 14.01.2011 11:37, Adrian Levi wrote:
I have (hopefully) taken on everybody's suggestions, Here is the
current script :)
#!/bin/sh
# Variables:
# Determine backup level
incrementalfile="/srv/tar_incremental_file"
if [ -f $incrementalfile ]
then
backuplevel="date +%w"
you want:
backuplevel
Adrian Levi wrote:
> zparameters="a -mhe=on -pd1ckhead -t7z -m0=lzma -mx=9 -mfb=64 -md=32m -ms=on
> -si"
> zfilename="Daily Backup - $(date +"%a %h %H%M %d-%m-%Y").$backuplevel.tar.7z"
Yuck! Look at all of those spaces in the filename! :-)
(Recalling all of the discussion over the past couple o
I know where the error lies but not how to fix it.
zparameters="a -mhe=on -pd1ckhead -t7z -m0=lzma -mx=9 -mfb=64 -md=32m
-ms=on -si"
zfilename="Daily Backup - $(date +"%a %h %H%M %d-%m-%Y").$backuplevel.tar.7z"
When these two expand here:
tar $tarparameters $backuppath | 7z $zparameters $zfilena
I have (hopefully) taken on everybody's suggestions, Here is the
current script :)
#!/bin/sh
# Variables:
# Determine backup level
incrementalfile="/srv/tar_incremental_file"
if [ -f $incrementalfile ]
then
backuplevel="date +%w"
else
backuplevel="0"
rm $incrementalfile > /dev/null 2>&1
fi
zpa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ispmarin wrote:
> I am looking for a printer with very low per page cost (catridges,
> tonners etc) and not very expensive to buy. I dont care if it is laser
> or deskjet. Performance is not a issue (it can be slow), and the
> quality of the page dont
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:19:56 +0200
Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:55:26 -0600
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 02/19/07 13:48, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:44:10 -
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:15:29 +0100, Arnt wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:20:47 GMT, s. wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:31:07 GMT "s. keeling"
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 10:54 +0100, Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Well, there's mutt which is TUI. GNOME Evolution has Reply To List,
> > and Icedove has an extension which adds Reply To List. That's what
> > I use.
> I've tried (several times) finding that extension. Care to te
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 10:54:12AM +0100 or thereabouts, Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Well, there's mutt which is TUI. GNOME Evolution has Reply To List,
> > and Icedove has an extension which adds Reply To List. That's what
> > I use.
> I've tried (several times) finding that
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Well, there's mutt which is TUI. GNOME Evolution has Reply To List,
> and Icedove has an extension which adds Reply To List. That's what
> I use.
I've tried (several times) finding that extension. Care to tell what it
is called?
--
Håkon Alstadheim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:20:47 GMT, s. wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:31:07 GMT "s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > My .sig explicitly says not to Cc: me, and that's ignored too.
> > > Why am
> >
> > H
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:19:56AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
> As I said before, the Reply button acts as Reply-to-list in case of a
> mailing list. No problem here. The thing I'm not sure of is what is
> the correct thing to do if the poster has set a Reply-To: header.
>
I believe that on a
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:55:26 -0600
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/19/07 13:48, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:44:10 -0600
> > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> (It's been a while since I used Sy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/19/07 13:48, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:44:10 -0600
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
(It's been a while since I used Sylpheed, but I think it has a
Reply To List option.
>>> It has three buttons:
>>>
>>> o
Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:44:10 -0600
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >> (It's been a while since I used Sylpheed, but I think it has a
> > >> Reply To List option.
> > >
> > > It has three buttons:
> > >
> > > o Reply: Reply-to-list for lists
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:44:10 -0600
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> (It's been a while since I used Sylpheed, but I think it has a
> >> Reply To List option.
> >
> > It has three buttons:
> >
> > o Reply: Reply-to-list for lists or simple reply for normal mail.
> > If a Reply-To: is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/19/07 11:52, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:22:53 -0600
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 02/19/07 10:44, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>>> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:31:0
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:22:53 -0600
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/19/07 10:44, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:31:07 GMT
> > "s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:31:07 GMT "s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > My .sig explicitly says not to Cc: me, and that's ignored too. Why am
>
> Hhhm, Sylpheed-Claws is automatically adding the Reply-To: address to
> the Cc:. Maybe I'm wrong, bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/19/07 10:44, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:31:07 GMT
> "s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:45:10 GMT
>>> "s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:31:07 GMT
"s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:45:10 GMT
> > "s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > I think you are overreacting a bit.
>
> Oh? About what?
>
> I'm serious.
Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:45:10 GMT
> "s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> I think you are overreacting a bit.
Oh? About what?
I'm serious. You snipped the context too, so anyone coming across
this post will have no idea what we're talk
the three R's of NT system administration (as occationally practiced
by me), Retry, Reboot, Reinstall...
Thankfully folks around here (MIT) are smart enough not to rely on
Windows being stable.
-Jon
31 matches
Mail list logo
