On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 01:10:00PM +0200, Joe Hart wrote:
> To be honest, I don't really think that Chris Bannister would make a
> good ethicist. Not because of his ethics, but because he seems to be
> reviving old threads that the last message is a week old when he replies
> to them.
True. Can't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:13:08 +0200, Joe Hart wrote:
>> Chris Bannister wrote:
[snip]
>>>
>>> We need a list ethicist who is not "out to lunch" :-)
>>>
>> Fine. I nominate you then. I don't want to be the ethicist anyway.
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:13:08 +0200, Joe Hart wrote:
> Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 08:05:15PM +0200, Joe Hart wrote:
> >>> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 04:56:09AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SH
3 matches
Mail list logo