On Thursday 19 November 2009 10:42:51 pm Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 08:24:58PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > Though the system in case is not such an "ancient" platform. i386 is
> > alive and well. Even FreeBSD supports it. Linux surely does.
>
> I think i486 is now the lowe
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 08:24:58PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Though the system in case is not such an "ancient" platform. i386 is
> alive and well. Even FreeBSD supports it. Linux surely does.
I think i486 is now the lowest supported platform on Linux, well at
least on Debian.
--
Chris.
--
On Wednesday 18 November 2009 08:37:26 am S. Fishpaste wrote:
> Agreed. I'm using Sid on a Toshiba P3 550 Coppermine, with xfce as the GUI
> and 300+ Ram. Runs fine even with Firefox 3.5.x, which admittedly is a
> little slow to start; but once running, browsing is fine. Chrome starts up
> much fa
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:51:04 -0500, Chris Jones in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
> Does performance degrade over time?
>
> If you implement one of the slimmer desktops and turn off unnecessary
> bells and whistles in your applications, I can't see any good reason why
> a recent version of debia
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:54:08PM EST, Javier Vasquez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry to ask specially through this list...
>
> I've been a linux user for around 10 years now, however lately some
> 800MHz Coppermine machines are not performing as well as they used to.
650 MHz Coppermine + 386M RAM.
How
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 08:31:09PM +, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> Why not using a minimal linux distro? Or LFS?
Why would you want to use LFS?
What's wrong with running Debian on it?
--
Tzafrir Cohen | tzaf...@jabber.org | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il || a Mutt's
tza
Why not using a minimal linux distro? Or LFS?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 09:36:03AM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:54:08 -0600
>> Javier Vasquez wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Sorry to ask specially through this list...
>>>
>>> I've been a linux user for around 10 years now, however lately some
>>> 800MHz Coppermine ma
Javier Vasquez put forth on 11/11/2009 10:54 PM:
> If any one could share pointers to more up to date benchmarks, which
> are as well oriented not just to networking and servers, it'd be
> great. The idea is to find data supporting the initial idea of
> freeBSD or openBSD providing better perform
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:54:08 -0600
Javier Vasquez wrote:
Hi,
Sorry to ask specially through this list...
I've been a linux user for around 10 years now, however lately some
800MHz Coppermine machines are not performing as well as they used to.
What I've read in this same list in the pas
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:54:08 -0600
Javier Vasquez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry to ask specially through this list...
>
> I've been a linux user for around 10 years now, however lately some
> 800MHz Coppermine machines are not performing as well as they used to.
>
> What I've read in this same list i
Hi,
Sorry to ask specially through this list...
I've been a linux user for around 10 years now, however lately some
800MHz Coppermine machines are not performing as well as they used to.
What I've read in this same list in the past, is that for the purpose
of still not letting them die, using op
12 matches
Mail list logo
