-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/29/06 11:28, Nelson Castillo wrote:
>> Anyhow, he said that most amusing thing about Microsoft was that they
>> are just getting around now to solving the problems that UNIX solved 20
>> years ago or more and still managing to make new mistakes i
Anyhow, he said that most amusing thing about Microsoft was that they
are just getting around now to solving the problems that UNIX solved 20
years ago or more and still managing to make new mistakes in the
process.
This is rather fun. I remember that in 1995 I didn't now UNIX
(I used to live in
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 08:40:16AM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
>
> Wouldn't the new way be the old way. I often say that the problems that
> Microsoft is "solving" with Windows now were solved 20+ years ago under the
> Unix(-like) tools. Prime example would be remote desktops. Windows only
> r
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Having worked at places which are majority windows and minority *nix, I
> can honestly say that the windows approach tends to encourage "tasking"
> of "junior" level admins to repetitive tasks by hand, because the
> "senior" admins don't want to do it themselves (i.e., t
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 01:54:19PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> Joe, for that reason I have always suggested and done Cygwin
> installations. It allows for the *nix commands. Does present much of the
> ability. There are many other things that can be installed on a Windows
> machine that allows
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 12:52 +, Joe wrote:
[...snip...]
> The Windows command line, especially on servers, has come a long way
> from DOS, it can read and write files, it can pipe, it can control
> complex permissions and other Active Directory features... but it
> still doesn't have the large r
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 12:52:24PM +, Joe wrote:
>
> Not exactly foreign, as many essential admin tools are command-line
> only, or at least easier to do from the command line than elsewhere.
> Ipconfig returns the same kind of data as ifconfig, and also allows
> some DNS and DHCP cache contro
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I'm not a windows guy, so I am not sure about scripting. Perhaps there
is a way as you suggest, but all of the windows admins I personally know
are only able to get around in the GUI. The concept of scripting
anything is foreign to them.
Not exactly foreign, as ma
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 05:26:06PM -0500, Stephen Yorke wrote:
> Most hosting facilities do allow FrontPage and/or FTP access...FrontPage
> does allow SSL connections but few people set it up which is sad. FTP
> is clear and is probably the most common way to allow access to M$
> Websites and no t
free SSH Servers out there for Windows and I like freeSSHd.
-Original Message-
From: Roberto C. Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 9:41 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [OT] M$ collaborates with Suse
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 08:10:08AM -0500
Am 2006-11-06 13:42:08, schrieb Ron Johnson:
> Linux crashed? That's bad.
It is coded to do so, since it prevent Jackpots :-P
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Li
Stephen Yorke wrote:
> To each their own BUT...
But nothing.
> Now look at 2003...it is rock solid in my thoughts unless you are
> looking at the WWW/HTML/.NET patches which were released recently but
> then again if you are looking at those and saying the OS is unsecure you
> must be running
Stephen Yorke wrote:
To each their own BUT...
No need for a "BUT". To each his own. Full Stop.
[snip]
Just remember this...your OS is only as secure as you are and if you do
not know how to secure it you shouldn't be using it.
The only real security is physical security. Anyone who wants t
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 08:10:08AM -0500, Stephen Yorke wrote:
>
> M$'s OS is ready...if you want some WWW Sites or servers which you think
> you can hack or take down let me know and I will setup a couple and let
> you go at it. If you hack them cool tell me how I can better my
> security if not
some day but
that is not going to happen anytime soon.
-Stephen
-Original Message-
From: Scarletdown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 3:29 AM
To: debian
Subject: Re: [OT] M$ collaborates with Suse
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 16:04 +0100, steef wrote:
> the fear
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 16:04 +0100, steef wrote:
> the fear of microsoft to get kicked out of markets.
>
We can only hope that may be the case some day. After all, Windows is
hardly ready for the desktop let alone the server markets. :D
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/06/06 12:53, Matthew Krauss wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
Coolness, sounds like good news for your career too! This reminded me,
I was in a casino and saw a video slot machine cra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/06/06 12:53, Matthew Krauss wrote:
> Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
[snip]
> Coolness, sounds like good news for your career too! This reminded me,
> I was in a casino and saw a video slot machine crash -- someone came by
> and reb
Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
But because of their lock on the desktop, they also have incredible
userland and developer mindshare.
You sure? I had a rather interesting conversation at work the other day.
I work at a casino outside of Vegas and the guy in charge of what te
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/05/06 12:28, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> But because of their lock on the desktop, they also have incredible
>> userland and developer mindshare.
>
> You sure? I had a rather interesting conversation at work the other day.
>
Ron Johnson wrote:
> But because of their lock on the desktop, they also have incredible
> userland and developer mindshare.
You sure? I had a rather interesting conversation at work the other day.
I work at a casino outside of Vegas and the guy in charge of what technology
we use for our pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/04/06 19:07, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:28:54AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> My eyes see lots of ProLiants running Win Server 2K3, and only some
>> running Linux, HP-UX and a few running z/OS & OpenVMS.
>
> Really? My
Ron Johnson wrote:
> The fact that MSFT's *income* in *always* increasing is prima facia
> evidence that MSFT is winning...
Winning what?
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:28:54AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> My eyes see lots of ProLiants running Win Server 2K3, and only some
> running Linux, HP-UX and a few running z/OS & OpenVMS.
>
Really? My eyes see about 12 racks of proliants and Suns, all running
Linux (except for one SunFire runn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/03/06 20:20, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Nov 03 08:55
> -0600]:
>> On (03/11/06 07:48), Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
[snip]
> Microsoft's motives are clear, they want to be dominant the
> player in IT. However, the
On Saturday 04 November 2006 04:20, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Nov 03 08:55 -0600]:
> > On (03/11/06 07:48), Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Google news reports that M$ is going to collaborate with Novell on Suse
> > > Linux.
> > > I wonder what th
* Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Nov 03 08:55 -0600]:
> On (03/11/06 07:48), Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Google news reports that M$ is going to collaborate with Novell on Suse
> > Linux.
> > I wonder what that means... ;-)
>
> Interesting but when you sup with the devil,
Max Hyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It sounds as if this effort includes a significant attempt to
> reinvigorate the rapidly-cooling ``you can get sued for using Linux''
> FUD.
>
> As part of the agreement, Microsoft said it would
> not file patent infringement suits against customer
Gentlefolk:
It sounds as if this effort includes a significant
attempt to reinvigorate the rapidly-cooling ``you can get
sued for using Linux'' FUD.
From the NYTimes article:
(http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/03/business/03soft.html?ei=5070&en=d4fb3a0a5a8877ae&ex=1163221200&adxnnl=1&emc=eta1&
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 04:04:39PM +0100, steef wrote:
} Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
} >Hi,
} >
} >Google news reports that M$ is going to collaborate with Novell on
} >Suse Linux.
} >I wonder what that means... ;-)
} >
} >H
} >
} >
} yes. one of our (dutch) regional papers writes about this deal. thei
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
Google news reports that M$ is going to collaborate with Novell on
Suse Linux.
I wonder what that means... ;-)
H
yes. one of our (dutch) regional papers writes about this deal. their
(novell and m$) aim is a 'collaboration' of software between window$ and
linux
On (03/11/06 07:48), Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Google news reports that M$ is going to collaborate with Novell on Suse
> Linux.
> I wonder what that means... ;-)
Interesting but when you sup with the devil, you need a very long
spoon.
MS has a history of signing agreements with poten
Hi,
Google news reports that M$ is going to collaborate with Novell on Suse
Linux.
I wonder what that means... ;-)
H
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
33 matches
Mail list logo
