Hi,
i wrote:
> > Monsanto's problem is not with getting patents but with
> > getting permission for their gene manipulated seeds.
Ron wrote:
> Problem is not with their genetically modified stuff, but with their refusal
> to let GM stuff be labelled as such.
That's a slightly different (off-)top
On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 12:50:04 +0200
"Thomas Schmitt" wrote:
> Monsanto's problem is not with getting patents but with
> getting permission for their gene manipulated seeds.
> Germans mistrust the genetech propaganda because it resembles
> the nuclear power propaganda from decades ago.
> Same liars
Hi,
i wrote:
> > Well, Monsanto genes are mostly illegal in Europe, anyway.
Curt wrote:
> http://www.globalagriculture.org/whats-new/news/news/en/30521.html
[patented broccoli]
Yep. That's the European Patent Office as we know it.
Happy to hand out patents for anything. This is good for
economy
On 2015-10-23, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> Well, Monsanto genes are mostly illegal in Europe, anyway.
> (Our patent office granted a patent on human genes. Against the
> law. Then it claimed the law prohibited to revoke it.
> Finally the patent holder gave it back after too much hate
> mail.)
>
Hi,
Gene Heskett wrote:
> Now that I've had time to think, the name was Smyce
Percy Schmeiser's legal adventures match the story.
I understand he purposefully used the windfall genes from
the neighbor fields to produce his own Monsanto seeds.
(Canola (tm), not rapeseed, because people would not b
On Friday 23 October 2015 09:31:15 Carl Fink wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 08:24:59AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Hell of an idea. That patenting of germplasm was a bad idea, and
> > will forever be a bad idea. This should begin to level the playing
> > field between the monsantos, and syn
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 08:24:59AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Hell of an idea. That patenting of germplasm was a bad idea, and will
> forever be a bad idea. This should begin to level the playing field
> between the monsantos, and syngenta's of the world. I've seen this
> before, but when
On Friday 23 October 2015 05:01:01 Curt wrote:
> Thought some of you revolutionaries might be interested in the
> following article on the Virginia Quarterly Review website:
>
> http://www.vqronline.org/reporting-articles/2014/05/linux-lettuce
Hell of an idea. That patenting of germplasm was a b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 09:01:01AM +, Curt wrote:
> Thought some of you revolutionaries might be interested in the following
> article on the Virginia Quarterly Review website:
>
> http://www.vqronline.org/reporting-articles/2014/05/linux-lettuce
Thought some of you revolutionaries might be interested in the following
article on the Virginia Quarterly Review website:
http://www.vqronline.org/reporting-articles/2014/05/linux-lettuce
10 matches
Mail list logo
