Re: [ILUG] mere samba&access horror

2000-09-06 Thread Kenn Humborg
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:58:09PM +0200, Deim Agoston wrote: > > > On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Kent West wrote: > > I had a similar problem when trying to keep an ACT!2000 database > > (Access-based, I think) on a Samba server. Whenever one user would > > access the database, some of the files would rev

Re: [ILUG] mere samba&access horror

2000-09-06 Thread Deim Agoston
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Kent West wrote: > I had a similar problem when trying to keep an ACT!2000 database > (Access-based, I think) on a Samba server. Whenever one user would > access the database, some of the files would revert to his ownership, > locking out other users. The solution was to modif

Re: [ILUG] mere samba&access horror

2000-09-05 Thread Kent West
Kenn Humborg wrote: > > > Thanks the responses to everyone who helped me to solve the mapping > > problem. But this Access stuff sucks ! I'm going mad. When I want to > > access the databases stored on the server frm more then one client it > > rejects to map the drive and the access program gives

Re: [ILUG] mere samba&access horror

2000-09-04 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 01:59:44PM +0100, Kenn Humborg wrote: > > Thanks the responses to everyone who helped me to solve the mapping > > problem. But this Access stuff sucks ! I'm going mad. When I want to > > access the databases stored on the server frm more then one client it > > rejects to map

RE: [ILUG] mere samba&access horror

2000-09-04 Thread Kenn Humborg
> Thanks the responses to everyone who helped me to solve the mapping > problem. But this Access stuff sucks ! I'm going mad. When I want to > access the databases stored on the server frm more then one client it > rejects to map the drive and the access program gives me the "Runtime > error" messa