Re: [Fwd: Princeton's reputation]

2000-12-11 Thread Robert Guthrie
I just got this back from hime (apparently). Looks like he wasn't reading the instructions carefully. -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: UNSUBSCRIBING Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 11:10:55 -0500 From: Jim Kroger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Robert Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - At

Re: [Fwd: Princeton's reputation]

2000-12-09 Thread kmself
Headers point to a box within the institute his CV says he works at. Mail headers indicate the messages were all sent between 22:10 and 22:17 local (EST) time. Could be a late Friday night prank, could be an irate academic. on Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 09:54:48PM -0800, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls ([EMAIL PR

Re: [Fwd: Princeton's reputation]

2000-12-09 Thread John Carline
Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote: > I wonder if perhaps someone accessed his office .. And computer. Yes, I wondered that myself. That's why I emphasized *may*. In any case the end result should be productive. Either he will become aware that others are accessing his computer or the president will beco

Re: [Fwd: Princeton's reputation]

2000-12-08 Thread Jaye Inabnit ke6sls
I wonder if perhaps someone accessed his office .. And computer. On Friday 08 December 2000 21:55, John Carline wrote: > Just in case those rude emails really did come from a Princeton > faculty member, I tried the following email using the last name > of President of the University. It hasn't

[Fwd: Princeton's reputation]

2000-12-08 Thread John Carline
Just in case those rude emails really did come from a Princeton faculty member, I tried the following email using the last name of President of the University. It hasn't bounced yet. John Original Message From: John Carline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Princeton's reputation