Re: [FIXED] Re: Loss of Flash Player capabilities in IW3.0

2008-07-21 Thread Tom Ashley
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 20:29 -0700, Kelly Clowers wrote: > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Nick Lidakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Kelly Clowers wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >>> Ha

Re: [FIXED] Re: Loss of Flash Player capabilities in IW3.0

2008-07-20 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Nick Lidakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kelly Clowers wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 07/20/08 14:01, Kelly Clowers wrote: >>> [snip]

Re: [FIXED] Re: Loss of Flash Player capabilities in IW3.0

2008-07-20 Thread Nick Lidakis
Kelly Clowers wrote: On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/20/08 14:01, Kelly Clowers wrote: [snip] Personally, I prefer Adobe's Flash 10 beta. It seems to have smoother playback and some report lower cpu us

Re: [FIXED] Re: Loss of Flash Player capabilities in IW3.0

2008-07-20 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07/20/08 14:01, Kelly Clowers wrote: > [snip] >> >> Personally, I prefer Adobe's Flash 10 beta. It seems to have smoother >> playback and some report lower cpu usage. >

Re: [FIXED] Re: Loss of Flash Player capabilities in IW3.0

2008-07-20 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/20/08 14:01, Kelly Clowers wrote: [snip] > > Personally, I prefer Adobe's Flash 10 beta. It seems to have smoother > playback and some report lower cpu usage. How stable is it? - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA "Kittens give Morbo gas.

Re: [FIXED] Re: Loss of Flash Player capabilities in IW3.0

2008-07-20 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:01:17PM -0700, Kelly Clowers wrote: > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Andrew Sackville-West > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > well, you still aren't running the debian version, but instead running > > the adobe installed version. There's nothing inherently wrong with

Re: [FIXED] Re: Loss of Flash Player capabilities in IW3.0

2008-07-20 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > well, you still aren't running the debian version, but instead running > the adobe installed version. There's nothing inherently wrong with > that except that your package manager doesn't have control of the > si

Re: [FIXED] Re: Loss of Flash Player capabilities in IW3.0

2008-07-20 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:30:31AM +0100, andy wrote: > andy wrote: >> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: >>> andy wrote: Greetings The following is one of a number of sites (including, for example, parts of the NASA site) where I am told that my version of Flash Player is outdated

[FIXED] Re: Loss of Flash Player capabilities in IW3.0

2008-07-20 Thread andy
andy wrote: Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: andy wrote: Greetings The following is one of a number of sites (including, for example, parts of the NASA site) where I am told that my version of Flash Player is outdated: "You need the latest Flash Player plugin to view the multimedia content of this si