On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:19 AM, André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>
> I just felt like telling you the above because I have the impression that a
> misunderstanding of the above is the source of 90% of the problems
> encountered by people unfamiliar with Virtual Hosting in general. I
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:19:34AM +0200, André Warnier wrote:
> Apart from the related tip from Kris about the various virtual server
> config files in /etc/apache2/sites-available and
> /etc/apache2/sites-enabled, here is what I do to insure that virtual
> servers are "included" in the corr
Zach Uram wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 3:54 PM, André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just a guess :
1) the new entry you have added to /etc/apache2/sites-available (and
sites-enabled) is called e.g. "darcs", which for some reason precedes
"default" in the directory.
2) in the apache.conf,
Please keep the discussion on list.
Did Florian's suggestion help?
- Forwarded message from Anton Liaukevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080509)
From: Anton Liaukevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:32:52 +0300
To: Chris Bannister
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 05:46:29PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Just replace "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
macro index , "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
macro pager , "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Thanks for forwarding it here, Chris. I trust this worked for you?
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
45
Just replace "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
- Forwarded message from Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
From: Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:28:27 +0530
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: reporting BTS spam e
On 6/1/07, Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt Price([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> hi,
>
> i'm about to take off on a long road trip through the us and am
> planning the technological elements. I'm looking for advice on
> purchasing a gps unit. If possible, i'd love to
- Forwarded message from Gayle Lee Fairless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Gayle Lee Fairless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 23:27:09 -0500
To: Debian User List
Subject: Re: Install which Linux? (or avoiding dirty birds)
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326)
On 05/
- Forwarded message from Jose Parrella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 14:53:14 -0400
From: Jose Parrella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: XMMS can no longer play CDs]
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i4
Arg... False file.
The previous one is broken!
Attached correct one.
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
# Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328
Hi Magnus and others...
Sorry, a little bit late, but I was not in Strasbourg...
Am 2006-03-07 17:29:26, schrieb Magnus Therning:
> Feel like sharing the procmail recipe?
>
> (I know I can go read the man-page, but I'm lazy today and my brain is a
> soft mush...)
Attached I have my little BASH
On 2/26/06, Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are other people receiving emails like the one I've attached afterposting to debian-user?
I presume we all are. I've filtered _everthing_ from 'uol.com.br'
to go straight to my gmail trash (so if there's anything legit from
there I'll not see
On 2/26/06, Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are other people receiving emails like the one I've attached after
> posting to debian-user?
>
> Is it possible to track down the person who's causing this and tell
> him/her to make sure the spamfilter skips postings from debian-user?
The
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:39:06PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>Am 2006-02-26 11:31:57, schrieb Magnus Therning:
>> Are other people receiving emails like the one I've attached after
>> posting to debian-user?
>
>Several 1000' for which I have written an Forwarder in procmail to
>redirect all in
Am 2006-02-26 11:31:57, schrieb Magnus Therning:
> Are other people receiving emails like the one I've attached after
> posting to debian-user?
Several 1000' for which I have written an Forwarder in
procmail to redirect all incomming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
to ALL availlable E-Mails of UOL.
I have bl
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:45:12 +0100
"Wim De Smet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/24/06, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> > > Interestingly, there is no two-line instruction on your mail.
> > > I've noticed the same for some o
On 2/24/06, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> > Interestingly, there is no two-line instruction on your mail.
> > I've noticed the same for some other people, too, but haven't chased it
> > down.
>
> Hint: it is there, your client
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 09:01:52PM -0700, Scott wrote:
> Alex Nordstrom spake thusly on 02/24/2006 10:06 AM:
> >Saturday, 25 February 2006 00:38, Kevin Mark wrote:
> >>Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
> >>It seems mutt users will be the primary ones to use this.
> >
>
Sunday, 26 February 2006 19:31, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Are other people receiving emails like the one I've attached after
> posting to debian-user?
Yes. Well, I was, until I spoke to my friendly mail server admins and
had them reject [EMAIL PROTECTED] at SMTP-time.
> Is it possible to track do
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 12:47:50PM -0500, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 11:38:00AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> } Hi spam-killers,
> } Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
> } It seems mutt users will be the primary ones to use this.
>
> Sure, no problem.
Are other people receiving emails like the one I've attached after
posting to debian-user?
Is it possible to track down the person who's causing this and tell
him/her to make sure the spamfilter skips postings from debian-user?
/M
--
Magnus Therning(OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
[EMA
John Halton spake thusly on 02/24/2006 09:51 AM:
On 2/24/06, Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[1] Bounce as in mutt b. I don't know if and how this can be done in
thunderbird
Apparently the following extension allows bouncing using Thunderbird -
http://mailredirect.mozdev.org/
Ha
Alex Nordstrom spake thusly on 02/24/2006 10:06 AM:
Saturday, 25 February 2006 00:38, Kevin Mark wrote:
Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
It seems mutt users will be the primary ones to use this.
Presumably, KMail users should also be able to participate.
And Thu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:40:04 +0200
Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:08:17 -0600
> Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:38:00 -0500
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:08:17 -0600
Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:38:00 -0500
> Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi spam-killers,
> > Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
> > It
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> Interestingly, there is no two-line instruction on your mail.
> I've noticed the same for some other people, too, but haven't chased it
> down.
Hint: it is there, your client isn't showing it, and it is related to gpg
support.
Mutt doesn't show it (by
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 01:06:27 +0800
Alex Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, as a question of policy, are the half-dozen daily "unsubscribe"
> messages from those too illiterate to comprehend a two-line
> instruction added in caps to every message on the list considered
> spam? They're cer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:38:00 -0500
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi spam-killers,
> Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
> It seems mutt users will be the primary ones to use this.
> Cheers,
> Kev
Sylpheed users ar
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 11:38:00AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
} Hi spam-killers,
} Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
} It seems mutt users will be the primary ones to use this.
Sure, no problem. Now, given that I archive my spam (yes, spamassassin is
trained on everythin
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006, Alex Nordstrom wrote:
> Now, as a question of policy, are the half-dozen daily "unsubscribe"
> messages from those too illiterate to comprehend a two-line instruction
> added in caps to every message on the list considered spam? They're
> certainly unsolicited (nobody wants
Saturday, 25 February 2006 00:38, Kevin Mark wrote:
> Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
> It seems mutt users will be the primary ones to use this.
Presumably, KMail users should also be able to participate.
> - Forwarded message from Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECT
On 2/24/06, Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [1] Bounce as in mutt b. I don't know if and how this can be done in
> thunderbird
Apparently the following extension allows bouncing using Thunderbird -
http://mailredirect.mozdev.org/
Haven't looked into it any further though so don't
Hi spam-killers,
Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
It seems mutt users will be the primary ones to use this.
Cheers,
Kev
- Forwarded message from Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:03:31 -0600
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Hallo!
[]'s
Why do we fall ?
So we can learn to pick ourselves up.
Please do not CC me! Get a proper mailer instead: www.mutt.org
.''`.
: :' :
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Eduardo Rocha Costa
Curriculum e personal page:
http://www.virtualcompu
On Sunday 15 January 2006 18:10, Bob Hynes wrote:
>Kent West wrote:
>>(Bob; let me encourage you to keep conversations on the list rather
>> than private replies; this way, others who might be helpful can
>> help; and others who are looking for the same answers can find the
>> answers both on the l
Kent West wrote:
(Bob; let me encourage you to keep conversations on the list rather than
private replies; this way, others who might be helpful can help; and
others who are looking for the same answers can find the answers both on
the list and later in the archives.)
Bob Hynes wrote:
Kent
Kent West wrote:
(Bob; let me encourage you to keep conversations on the list rather than
private replies; this way, others who might be helpful can help; and
others who are looking for the same answers can find the answers both on
the list and later in the archives.)
Bob Hynes wrote:
Kent
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:29:03 -0800
Kenward Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sending this back to the list to keep it online. Middle stuff
> chopped out...
>
> - Forwarded message from Bob Hynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Delivery-date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 15:30:10 -0800
> From: Bob
(Bob; let me encourage you to keep conversations on the list rather than
private replies; this way, others who might be helpful can help; and
others who are looking for the same answers can find the answers both on
the list and later in the archives.)
Bob Hynes wrote:
> Kent West wrote:
>
>> Bob
Bob Hynes reports a slow Debian setup.
My first suspicion would be that DMA is not turned on. What's the
results of running "hdparm /dev/hda" (assuming your setup is installed
on /dev/hda)?
--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
I'm sending this back to the list to keep it online. Middle stuff
chopped out...
- Forwarded message from Bob Hynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivery-date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 15:30:10 -0800
From: Bob Hynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kenward Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: system require
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 08:57:11PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, D. Joe Anderson wrote:
> > As per the recommendation below, I'm forwarding this.
> >
> > - Forwarded message from Andrew Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> >
> > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 01:23:08 +0100
> > From:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wow. Now I broke the thread. Damn I'm good! ;-(
Lorenzo
- --
- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s:+ a- C+++ UL P+ L+++ E- W++ N o K- w---
O M V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5+ X+ R tv-- b++ DI-- D+
G e* h r+++ y+++
- --END
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oh no! I meant to send this to the list. I need to check my fields better. It
seems when I hit reply on debian-user, it sends to the person who sent the
message instead of sending it back to the list like most lists do. I usually
catch it, but this
44 matches
Mail list logo
