On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 11:47:26PM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Who reads a message who doesn't see the subject line???
> > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 09:15:22AM +0200, deloptes wrote:
> >> it is not clear which version of Debian you are using.
There's one.
> # dpkg -l | egrep 'mpv|mplayer'
> # ap
Greg Wooledge composed on 2021-05-14 07:58 (UTC-0400):
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 09:15:22AM +0200, deloptes wrote:
>> it is not clear which version of Debian you are using.
> See, this *right here* is why you do not put important details only
> in the Subject: header.
> Some people don't read
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> See, this *right here* is why you do not put important details only
> in the Subject: header.
Yeah, sorry, I just now noticed [Bullseye]
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 09:15:22AM +0200, deloptes wrote:
> it is not clear which version of Debian you are using.
See, this *right here* is why you do not put important details only
in the Subject: header.
Some people don't read Subject: headers. Make sure all of the relevant
details are in the
Felix Miata wrote:
> Why do I want smplayer? VLC is routinely trouble, like failing to play
> audio or video or both together in sync, or failing to find and offer the
> starting point automatically.
>
> ATM, VLC won't play audio, even though user is authorized in /etc/groups
> for audio, cdrom a
On Vi, 14 mai 21, 02:04:14, Felix Miata wrote:
> I wanted to install smplayer. Even though Install-Recommends is false, apt
> wants
> to install mpv, imagemagick-common, and fonts-urw-base35. Does anyone here
> know
> why a video player requires additional fonts instead of using already
> instal
I wanted to install smplayer. Even though Install-Recommends is false, apt wants
to install mpv, imagemagick-common, and fonts-urw-base35. Does anyone here know
why a video player requires additional fonts instead of using already installed
fonts? What about why more imagemagick is required, or why
7 matches
Mail list logo
