Re: [ANSWER] Why gpm is weird.

On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 02:23:28PM -0500, stan wrote: | On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 10:58:29AM -0500, dman wrote: | > | > Huh. I wonder what all this really means ... I had heard, a while | > back, that imwheel was no longer needed since X now supports the | > scroll wheel directly. I've never actu

Re: [ANSWER] Why gpm is weird.

On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 10:58:29AM -0500, dman wrote: > > Huh. I wonder what all this really means ... I had heard, a while > back, that imwheel was no longer needed since X now supports the > scroll wheel directly. I've never actually used imwheel myself. I > also have never seen any problems

Re: [ANSWER] Why gpm is weird.

On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 12:31:31AM +1300, Cameron Kerr wrote: | I found some interesting information on the imwheel homepage that | concerned anyone running gpm as well as X4 (ie. most people) | | Here's a link to the page | | http://jcatki.2y.net/imwheel/ | | And heres the relevant part of the

[ANSWER] Why gpm is weird.

I found some interesting information on the imwheel homepage that concerned anyone running gpm as well as X4 (ie. most people) Here's a link to the page http://jcatki.2y.net/imwheel/ And heres the relevant part of the page XFree86 4.0 usage with GPM and/or JAM UPDATE:XFree 4.0a (an internal wor