On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 09:42:19PM -0500, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> dpkg-deb: error: failed to read archive
> '/var/cache/apt/archives/dpkg_1.22.1_amd64.deb': Too many levels of
> symbolic links
> dpkg: error: parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 2 package
I ran sudo apt update this morning I received the error message:
>>
>> E: You don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
>>
>> Can I increase the size of the /var partition on the ssd without
>> having to reinstall the system?
>>
>> Thank
On 2023-12-17, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 16/12/2023 22:46, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
>>
>> I'll add 'sudo apt-get autoclean to' my update bat file.
>
> I have
>
> APT::Keep-Downloaded-Packages "false";
I thought that was the default now for apt. But then he said "sudo apt" in the
OP and "apt-
On 16/12/2023 22:46, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
I'll add 'sudo apt-get autoclean to' my update bat file.
I have
APT::Keep-Downloaded-Packages "false";
in a file inside "/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/". However I use apt-cacher-ng. In
you case this settings may be excessively aggressive.
Charles Curley writes:
> Does anybody read signatures any more?
I certainly don't.
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 20:30:27 +0100
wrote:
> > I'll add 'sudo apt-get autoclean to' my update bat file.
>
> Bat? 🦇
Yeah, bat file. That's what one uses to smooth the body putty on one's
custom batmobile.
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
https://charlescurley.com
https://charlescurl
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 10:46:27AM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> Many thanks for the replies.
>
> I'll add 'sudo apt-get autoclean to' my update bat file.
Bat? 🦇
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 10:46:27 -0500
"Stephen P. Molnar" wrote:
> I'll add 'sudo apt-get autoclean to' my update bat file.
Or add it to your crontab.
root@tsalmoth:~# grep clean /etc/cron.d/curley
0 4 18 * * root apt-get -y autoclean
root@tsalmoth:~#
--
Does
x27;t have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
Can I increase the size of the /var partition on the ssd without
having to reinstall the system?
Thanks in advance.
You can bind mount more space from another partition or create a directory on
another file system and sylmink it to /var/
var etc, and selected the default
sizes of the partitions.
When I ran sudo apt update this morning I received the error message:
E: You don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
Can I increase the size of the /var partition on the ssd without
having to reinstall the system?
Tha
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 03:03:38PM +0100, john doe wrote:
> On 12/16/23 14:45, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> > When I installed the OS I selected the option for separate /var
> > etc, and selected the default sizes of the partitions.
[…]
> > Can I increase the size of the /var partition on t
ation for most
installations.
I make /home/ separate, and the ESP as it must be, but keep the OS itself on one
filesystem.
> When I ran sudo apt update this morning I received the error message:
> E: You don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
> Can I increase the siz
ge:
>
> E: You don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
>
> Can I increase the size of the /var partition on the ssd without
> having to reinstall the system?
>
> Thanks in advance.
Are you doing anything to get rid of unused packages? If not the
ar
x27;t have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
Can I increase the size of the /var partition on the ssd without having
to reinstall the system?
LVM is one way to avoid this! ;^)
--
John Doe
tion them? Are you using
raw partitions under GPT or DOS partition tables? Are you using LVM?
RAID? Encryption?
> When I ran sudo apt update this morning I received the error message:
>
> E: You don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
>
> Can I increase the size
I am running Bookworm on my Debian computer. When I installed the OS I
selected the option for separate /var etc, and selected the default
sizes of the partitions.
When I ran sudo apt update this morning I received the error message:
E: You don't have enough free space in /var/cach
On 01/24/2019 08:23 AM, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 24 Jan 2019 at 07:25:46 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
On 01/23/2019 08:53 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 23/01/2019 à 15:43, Richard Owlett a écrit :
1. If /var/cache/apt/archives/ has the same or later version
version of a package, will
On Thu 24 Jan 2019 at 07:25:46 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 01/23/2019 08:53 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> > Le 23/01/2019 à 15:43, Richard Owlett a écrit :
> > >
> > > 1. If /var/cache/apt/archives/ has the same or later version
> > > version of
Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 01/23/2019 08:53 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>> Le 23/01/2019 à 15:43, Richard Owlett a écrit :
>>>
>>> 1. If /var/cache/apt/archives/ has the same or later version version
>>> of a package, will Synaptic and apt-get automatically
On 01/24/2019 07:51 AM, Dan Purgert wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
On 01/23/2019 08:53 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 23/01/2019 à 15:43, Richard Owlett a écrit :
1. If /var/cache/apt/archives/ has the same or later version version
of a package, will Synaptic and apt-get automatically use
On 01/23/2019 08:53 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 23/01/2019 à 15:43, Richard Owlett a écrit :
1. If /var/cache/apt/archives/ has the same or later version version
of a package, will Synaptic and apt-get automatically use contents of
/var/cache/apt/archives/ in preference to downloading
On 01/23/2019 08:52 AM, Dan Purgert wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
This actually two 'related' questions.
1. If /var/cache/apt/archives/ has the same or later version version of
a package, will Synaptic and apt-get automatically use contents of
/var/cache/apt/archives/ in pre
Richard Owlett wrote:
> This actually two 'related' questions.
>
> 1. If /var/cache/apt/archives/ has the same or later version version of
> a package, will Synaptic and apt-get automatically use contents of
> /var/cache/apt/archives/ in preference to downloading w
Le 23/01/2019 à 15:43, Richard Owlett a écrit :
1. If /var/cache/apt/archives/ has the same or later version version of
a package, will Synaptic and apt-get automatically use contents of
/var/cache/apt/archives/ in preference to downloading whatever is at
location specified by sources.list
This actually two 'related' questions.
1. If /var/cache/apt/archives/ has the same or later version version of
a package, will Synaptic and apt-get automatically use contents of
/var/cache/apt/archives/ in preference to downloading whatever is at
location specified by sources.lis
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:16:32PM +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> Thanks for your replies.
No problem, glad I could help.
> I guess I'll have to submit some reports, for example that the man
> does not says explicitly the order of the arguments. I'll do some
> other tries before t
Le 30.04.2014 00:01, Tom Furie a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 05:00:03PM +0100, Tom Furie wrote:
The URI needs to be the last element of the command. You will find
most
of the required files if you mount the iso and pass the mount point
with
--scan, passing the iso file finds 0 files. Usi
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 05:00:03PM +0100, Tom Furie wrote:
> The URI needs to be the last element of the command. You will find most
> of the required files if you mount the iso and pass the mount point with
> --scan, passing the iso file finds 0 files. Using --scan causes jigdo to
> not ask for f
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 04:27:20PM +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am trying to update some iso images ( I have downloaded ISOs last
> week, but it seems that there were an update since, my images are in
> 7.4 and last debian stable is 7.5 ) through jigdo, and wanted to
Le 29.04.2014 16:27, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org a écrit :
Hello.
I am trying to update some iso images ( I have downloaded ISOs last
week, but it seems that there were an update since, my images are in
7.4 and last debian stable is 7.5 ) through jigdo, and wanted to play
a little with its scr
Hello.
I am trying to update some iso images ( I have downloaded ISOs last
week, but it seems that there were an update since, my images are in 7.4
and last debian stable is 7.5 ) through jigdo, and wanted to play a
little with its scriptable possibilities, since it seems that there is a
--no
Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2008-07-05 07:49 +0200, gary turner wrote:
(Reading database ... 85648 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking ia32-libs-gtk (from .../ia32-libs-gtk_2.5_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error
processing /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-gtk_2.5_amd64.deb
(--unpack
On 2008-07-05 07:49 +0200, gary turner wrote:
> (Reading database ... 85648 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking ia32-libs-gtk (from .../ia32-libs-gtk_2.5_amd64.deb) ...
> dpkg: error
> processing /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-gtk_2.5_amd64.deb
> (--unpack
.5 [12.2MB]
Fetched 12.2MB in 35s
(346kB/s)
(Reading database ... 85648 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking ia32-libs-gtk (from .../ia32-libs-gtk_2.5_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error
processing /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs-gtk_2.5_amd64.deb
(--unpack):
failed in buffer_write(fd) (
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 12:11:06AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Has anyone seen this issue before (*). I am running a linux debian
> stable (etch).
>
> Thanks
> left on device
> dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
> Running postrm hook script /sbin/updat
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:41 AM, Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue April 8 2008 15:37:25 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > What I am reading wrong:
> >
> > $ df
> > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> > /dev/mapper/Debian-root
> >
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Damon L. Chesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Bird wrote:
On Tue April 8 2008 15:11:06 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Has anyone seen this issue before (*). I am running a linux debian
stable (etch).
Yes. Wo
On Tue April 8 2008 15:37:25 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> What I am reading wrong:
>
> $ df
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/mapper/Debian-root
> 264854255254 0 100% /
>
> everything looks fine, right ?
Damon is right. Y
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Damon L. Chesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Bird wrote:
>
> > On Tue April 8 2008 15:11:06 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Has anyone seen this issue before (*). I am running a linux debian
> > > stable (etch).
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Yes. Wou were lucky
Mike Bird wrote:
On Tue April 8 2008 15:11:06 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Has anyone seen this issue before (*). I am running a linux debian
stable (etch).
Yes. Wou were lucky. Sometimes when /boot is full it silently
corrupts the initramfs without any error message. You probably
nee
On Tue April 8 2008 15:11:06 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Has anyone seen this issue before (*). I am running a linux debian
> stable (etch).
Yes. Wou were lucky. Sometimes when /boot is full it silently
corrupts the initramfs without any error message. You probably
need to make room in /boot,
-2.6.18-5-486_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch6_i386.deb)
...
The directory /lib/modules/2.6.18-5-486 still exists. Continuing as directed.
Done.
Unpacking replacement linux-image-2.6.18-5-486 ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.18-5-486_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch6_i386.deb
(--unpack
-13etch6_i386.deb)
...
The directory /lib/modules/2.6.18-5-486 still exists. Continuing as directed.
Done.
Unpacking replacement linux-image-2.6.18-5-486 ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.18-5-486_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch6_i386.deb
(--unpack):
failed in buffer_write(fd
ently installed.)
> Preparing to replace x11-common 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 (using
.../x11-common_1%3a7.0.22_i386.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement x11-common ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/x11-common_1%3a7.0.22_i386.deb
(--unpack):
> trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R6/bin&
ree86 debconf values to
xserver-xorg.
(Reading database ... 131640 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace x11-common 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 (using
.../x11-common_1%3a7.0.22_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement x11-common ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/x11-com
Uwe Dippel wrote:
> How can I 'register' it with apt-get as *installed* and latest package; so
> that apt-get does not insist any longer on throwing it out ?
Not the solution, but a workaround:
echo "deb http://ftp.debian-unofficial.org/debian sarge main contrib
non-free restricted" >> /etc/apt/s
Here I want to clone machines from a parent;
with a script that installs packages from a list file automatically.
In order to speed up the process, I will prepare the
/var/cache/apt/archives with all .deb packages.
Okay, this works.
I also created the pseudo-Java package as described
(e.g. http
David Purton wrote:
apt-get autoclean - this will delete all packages not currently installed
Correction: from "man apt-get"
autoclean
Like clean, autoclean clears out the local repository of
retrieved package files. The difference
is that it only removes package f
Aditya Pratap wrote:
Hi,
I am getting this message when I try to upgrade KDE using apt-get install -
You don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/.
Is it ok if I delete the files in this directory? Or is there any other
way out.
Thanking in advance,
You are just storing previ
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 17:14:59 +0530, Aditya Pratap
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am getting this message when I try to upgrade KDE using apt-get install -
> You don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/.
> Is it ok if I delete the files in this dir
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 05:14:59PM +0530, Aditya Pratap wrote:
> Hi,
> I am getting this message when I try to upgrade KDE using apt-get install -
> You don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/.
> Is it ok if I delete the files in this directory? Or is there any
Hi,
I am getting this message when I try to upgrade KDE using apt-get
install -
You don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/.
Is it ok if I delete the files in this directory? Or is there any other
way out.
Thanking in advance,
--
Aditya Pratap V.,
Goshamahal, Hyde
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 04:44, Robert Waldner wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:40:29 PDT, Paul Johnson writes:
>
> >> (Pls CC me on replies, I'm not on the list with this address)
>
> >I know it's a rude shock, but this public forum doesn't exist for your
> >sole, private benefit. If you want a priv
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 10:44:36AM +0200, Robert Waldner wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:40:29 PDT, Paul Johnson writes:
> >apt-get autoclean (and it isn't in apt.conf(5), it's in apt-get(8),
> Thanks, but this isn't what I'm looking for:
>autoclean
> Like clean, autoclean cle
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:40:29 PDT, Paul Johnson writes:
>> Is it possible to somehow tell apt to use no more than X MB of space
>> for the archive, or not to keep more than Y versions of any package?
>> I can't find anything about it in apt.conf(5).
>apt-get autoclean (and it isn't in apt.conf(5),
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Waldner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it possible to somehow tell apt to use no more than X MB of space
> for the archive, or not to keep more than Y versions of any package?
> I can't find anything about it in apt.conf(5).
apt-get autoclea
On Friday 15 October 2004 14:05, Maurits van Rees wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 12:33:07PM -0400, Derrick Hudson wrote:
> > One solution would be to make that directory a separate file system.
> > Then when the filesystem's space is consumed apt won't be able to
> > exceed that limit.
>
> I wond
> automatically.
But the original poster is right that this may not be desired. Having
an older package around as replacement for a bug-ridden new one can be
a life saver.
Here's a little script that can be a beginning.
#! /bin/sh
MAXSIZE=700 # CD-Rom size. You may want something
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 12:52:18PM +0200, Robert Waldner wrote:
|
| On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:53:19 +0200, Maurits van Rees writes:
| >> Is it possible to somehow tell apt to use no more than X MB of
| >> space for the archive, or not to keep more than Y versions of any
| >> package? I can't find
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:53:19 +0200, Maurits van Rees writes:
>> Is it possible to somehow tell apt to use no more than X MB of
>> space for the archive, or not to keep more than Y versions of any
>> package? I can't find anything about it in apt.conf(5).
>That man page has something that come
his figure
low, then your package cache in /var/cache/apt/archives also can't
grow too large. Then again, I'm beginning to doubt if this is actually
true...
Having a limit on the archive cache could be useful for me as
well. Every now and then I make a CD with all the packages in
Hi!
Is it possible to somehow tell apt to use no more than X MB of
space for the archive, or not to keep more than Y versions of any
package? I can't find anything about it in apt.conf(5).
(Pls CC me on replies, I'm not on the list with this address)
cheers+tia,
&rw
--
-- > Naja, inzwische
Shahid Bhatti wrote:
Hi,
While doing a distribution upgrade on my newly installed Debian server
it seems I've run out of space on the root partition / because I got the
error message "E: Sorry, you don't have enough free space in
/var/cache/apt/archives/ to hold all the .deb
Hi,
While doing a distribution upgrade on my newly installed Debian server
it seems I've run out of space on the root partition / because I got the
error message "E: Sorry, you don't have enough free space in
/var/cache/apt/archives/ to hold all the .debs."
Now I have adde
Hello
Antonio Rodriguez (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I have used in the past apt-move to create a local mirror. I usually
> like to keep archives with the debs, in case I need to reinstall them
> and they are gone from the archives, after being replaced by new
> versions. At this point I would
I have used in the past apt-move to create a local mirror. I usually
like to keep archives with the debs, in case I need to reinstall them
and they are gone from the archives, after being replaced by new
versions. At this point I would like better to just restore all the
debs that have been deleted
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 08:17:24PM +0530, Sharninder wrote:
> It's a silly question but i don't know where to ask. What's the use
> of all the files in the /var/cache/apt/archives directory. They all
> seem to be debs of any package that i have installed in my comp.
&g
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 15:47, Sharninder wrote:
> What's the use
> of all the files in the /var/cache/apt/archives directory.
They are an archive/cache of the debs you installed :) to save you the
trouble of downloading again should you not have made up your mind if
you want them ins
> hi,
> It's a silly question but i don't know where to ask. What's the use
> of all the files in the /var/cache/apt/archives directory. They all
> seem to be debs of any package that i have installed in my comp.
> ever.
> Sharninder Singh
> National Institu
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 08:17:24PM +0530, Sharninder wrote:
> It's a silly question but i don't know where to ask. What's the use
> of all the files in the /var/cache/apt/archives directory. They all
> seem to be debs of any package that i have installed in my comp.
&g
Sharninder wrote:
hi,
It's a silly question but i don't know where to ask. What's the use
of all the files in the /var/cache/apt/archives directory. They all
seem to be debs of any package that i have installed in my comp.
ever.
Sharninder Singh
National Institute Of Management Ca
yes, they are .deb packages you downloaded (and installed) with apt.
If they were properly installed on your system, you can delete them
safely...
Sharninder escribió:
hi,
It's a silly question but i don't know where to ask. What's the use
of all the files in the /var/cac
hi,
It's a silly question but i don't know where to ask. What's the use
of all the files in the /var/cache/apt/archives directory. They all
seem to be debs of any package that i have installed in my comp.
ever.
Sharninder Singh
National Institute Of Management Calcutta
Building
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 13:54, Craig Dickson wrote:
> Sebastiaan wrote:
>
> > Yes: rm /var/cache/apt/archives/*
> >
> > You usually update packages only, or install it once. You won't harm your
> > system if you remove the old packages. If it is needed, the pa
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 12:58, Sebastian D.B. Krause wrote:
> On 3468 September 1993, Alan Chandler wrote:
> > My /var/cache/apt/archives directory seems to have nearly a gig of .deb files.
> > I notice there is more than one version of each (it looks like its always 2).
> >
&
Sebastiaan wrote:
> Yes: rm /var/cache/apt/archives/*
>
> You usually update packages only, or install it once. You won't harm your
> system if you remove the old packages. If it is needed, the packages will
> be downloaded again.
Not if it isn't in the repository anym
On Saturday 01 March 2003 1:27 pm, Alan Chandler wrote:
>My /var/cache/apt/archives directory seems to have nearly a gig of .deb
> files. I notice there is more than one version of each (it looks like its
>always 2).
>Is there a command to shrink it?
apt-get clean works for me.
Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
> My /var/cache/apt/archives directory seems to have nearly a gig of
> .deb files. I notice there is more than one version of each (it looks
> like its always 2).
>
> Is there a command to shrink it?
"apt-get
On 3468 September 1993, Alan Chandler wrote:
> My /var/cache/apt/archives directory seems to have nearly a gig of .deb files.
> I notice there is more than one version of each (it looks like its always 2).
>
> Is there a command to shrink it?
rm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
Hi,
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Alan Chandler wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> My /var/cache/apt/archives directory seems to have nearly a gig of .deb files.
> I notice there is more than one version of each (it looks like its always 2).
>
> Is there a
Alan Chandler wrote:
My /var/cache/apt/archives directory seems to have nearly a gig of .deb files.
I notice there is more than one version of each (it looks like its always 2).
Is there a command to shrink it?
'apt-get autoclean' will get rid of the duplicate ones[or more precisely
Alan Chandler said:
>
> Is there a command to shrink it?
apt-get clean
apt-get autoclean
(see apt-get manpage)
nate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My /var/cache/apt/archives directory seems to have nearly a gig of .deb files.
I notice there is more than one version of each (it looks like its always 2).
Is there a command to shrink it?
- --
Alan Chandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP
ves. After unpacking 39.1MB will be
>> used.
>> E: Sorry, you don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
>> to hold all the .debs.
>
>To safely remove old/obsolete packages from the cache:
>
>apt-get autoclean
>
>If this still doesn't give
on Tue, 04 Feb 2003 11:13:02PM -0500, Emma Jane Hogbin insinuated:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:36:38AM +0900, Nick Hastings wrote:
> > To safely remove old/obsolete packages from the cache: apt-get
> > autoclean
>
> Yes, do this first!
great, just what i needed. thanks.
> > If this still doesn
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:36:38AM +0900, Nick Hastings wrote:
> To safely remove old/obsolete packages from the cache:
> apt-get autoclean
Yes, do this first!
> If this still doesn't give you enough space you can tell apt to put
> the cache somewhere other than /var, however I can't remember how
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:19:11PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> Need to get 69.0MB/109MB of archives. After unpacking 39.1MB will be
> used.
> E: Sorry, you don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
> to hold all the .debs.
apt-get autoclean to clear just out of
on Tue, 04 Feb 2003 09:43:25PM -0500, Seneca insinuated:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:19:11PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> > so, it's pretty full. 288M of that is in /var/cache/apt/archives,
> > and are a lot of debs. can i safely delete these all to make room
> >
Sorry, you don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
> to hold all the .debs.
>
> ... which is true:
>
> orange:~# df -h
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda5 93M 25M 63M 29% /
> /dev/hda1
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:19:11PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> so, it's pretty full. 288M of that is in /var/cache/apt/archives, and
> are a lot of debs. can i safely delete these all to make room for the
> new ones? there's nothing here that i need for these packages to
Sorry, you don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
> to hold all the .debs.
>
> ... which is true:
>
> orange:~# df -h
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda5 93M 25M 63M 29% /
> /dev/hda1
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:19:11PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> so, it's pretty full. 288M of that is in /var/cache/apt/archives, and
> are a lot of debs. can i safely delete these all to make room for the
> new ones? there's nothing here that i need for these packages to r
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:19:11PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> so, it's pretty full. 288M of that is in /var/cache/apt/archives, and
> are a lot of debs. can i safely delete these all to make room for the
> new ones? there's nothing here that i need for these packa
Nori Heikkinen said:
> so, it's pretty full. 288M of that is in /var/cache/apt/archives, and
> are a lot of debs. can i safely delete these all to make room for the
> new ones? there's nothing here that i need for these packages to run,
> right?
Should be able to. E
my /var is 465M. i'm trying to do and apt-get upgrade, which i
haven't in a while, and got the following message:
Need to get 69.0MB/109MB of archives. After unpacking 39.1MB will be
used.
E: Sorry, you don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
to hold all the .debs
I had potato debian installed, then upgraded the
system
fom potato to woody. During the upgrade through ftp
using apt-get it downloaded and saved the newpackages
in
/var/cache/apt/archives.
I then burned all the files in that directory. I also
had
potato debian installed in my home pc, i
Marcelo Leal wrote:
> but i did not see this apt-move
> there are apt-get apt-cache apt-config apt-setup apt-sortpkgs...
> apt-move???
apt-move is a seperate package.
--
Simon Hepburn.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
thanks!!!
very much...
but i did not see this apt-move
there are apt-get apt-cache apt-config apt-setup apt-sortpkgs...
apt-move???
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 12:18, Simon Hepburn wrote:
> I think the simplest solution would be disk imaging software or a backup
> program designed for bare-metal re
I think the simplest solution would be disk imaging software or a backup
program designed for bare-metal recovery. mondo was featured in LJ recently
and there are .deb's available in sid.
It can be done using package management. See the man page for dpkg.
Specifically the --get-selections opti
i run some command (apt-get, dpkg, or another) and the softwares are
installed.
6- i have two machines with the same configuration.
thanks.
On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 12:09, Craig Sampson wrote:
> >New installation from /var/cache/apt/archives
> >
> >> May I do that ?
> >&g
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
