Quoting Michelle Konzack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> for an half hour I had done this with my Workstation and 700 MBytes...
> (asked in [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> I have used this:
>
> mount /dev/hdb1 /mnt
> cp -fpR /usr/src/* /mnt
> umount /mnt
> rm -fR /usr/src/*
> rm -fR /usr/src/.*
Isn't that one of
Quoting David J. Kanter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I've created/moved my /usr/src to its own partition. However, I've noticed a
> difference in the permissions between the old /usr/src (/usr/oldsrc) and the
> new one, /usr/src.
>
> drwxrwsr-x4 root src 1024 Oct 16 00:18 oldsrc
> drwxr
On Sun, 14 Nov 1999, Ethan Benson wrote:
erbens >
erbens >does anyone know the exact rational for the root.staff 2775
erbens >permissions on /usr/local? I suppose it could theoretically be used
erbens >to allow a privileged user to do make installs on non packaged
erbens >software and have it
On 14/11/99 Kevin Heath wrote:
Could someone please remind us exactly what setgid on directories
does? I think it causes any file created in that directory to
automatically have its group ownership, but I'm not certain.
yup, any file/directory created in a setgid directory inherits the
group
On Sun, Nov 14, 1999 at 12:52:28PM -0600, David J. Kanter wrote:
> drwxrwsr-x4 root src 1024 Oct 16 00:18 oldsrc
> drwxr-xr-x5 root root 1024 Nov 14 12:33 src
>
> Could someone explain the difference? I tried setting chmod g=+r+w+s
> /usr/src, but that apparently d
MK>I've created/moved my /usr/src to its own partition. However, I've
noticed a
MK>difference in the permissions between the old /usr/src (/usr/oldsrc) and
the
MK>new one, /usr/src.
MK>
MK>drwxrwsr-x4 root src 1024 Oct 16 00:18 oldsrc
MK>drwxr-xr-x5 root root 1024 N
I've created/moved my /usr/src to its own partition. However, I've noticed a
difference in the permissions between the old /usr/src (/usr/oldsrc) and the
new one, /usr/src.
drwxrwsr-x4 root src 1024 Oct 16 00:18 oldsrc
drwxr-xr-x5 root root 1024 Nov 14 12:33 src
C
7 matches
Mail list logo
