Re: /proc permissions

2001-10-21 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:12:07AM -0500, Mullins, Ron ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Andrej Hocevar wrote: > > >did you deliberately insult me with your self-boasting remarks or > >was it just me reacting prickly? to me it seems that my question > > It would seem just a little of both. ;) Karsten

Re: /proc permissions and other things

2001-10-18 Thread andrej hocevar
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:12:07AM -0500, Mullins, Ron wrote: > Andrej Hocevar wrote: > > >did you deliberately insult me with your self-boasting remarks or > >was it just me reacting prickly? to me it seems that my question > > It would seem just a little of both. ;) Karsten is often brusque in

RE: /proc permissions

2001-10-18 Thread Mullins, Ron
Andrej Hocevar wrote: >did you deliberately insult me with your self-boasting remarks or >was it just me reacting prickly? to me it seems that my question It would seem just a little of both. ;) Karsten is often brusque in requesting list etiquette be observed. I will share a better way to change

Re: /proc permissions

2001-10-18 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 01:51:30PM +, andrej hocevar wrote: > dear karsten, > did you deliberately insult me with your self-boasting remarks or > was it just me reacting prickly? I did not read all of this thread. But I can assure you Karsten is a nice fellow with some wits. > > Please use

Re: /proc permissions

2001-10-18 Thread andrej hocevar
dear karsten, did you deliberately insult me with your self-boasting remarks or was it just me reacting prickly? to me it seems that my question was pretty much clear and thus your reply does not make much sense. it's happened before to me that someone didn't like my subject in connection with the

Re: /proc permissions

2001-10-17 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 10:53:07AM +, andrej hocevar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 08:01:12PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > on Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 02:19:35PM +, andrej hocevar ([EMAIL > > PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > lately i've inherited my brother's rockwell mode

Re: /proc permissions

2001-10-17 Thread andrej hocevar
so now i've found out that there's also the /proc/sys/proc directory to which one should be able to write and thus make modifications to the system. since it is empty, do i just have to create a new file with the name /proc/sys/proc/pci and append only the lines i first wanted to add to /proc/pci?

Re: /proc permissions and hsf modems

2001-10-16 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 02:19:35PM +, andrej hocevar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > lately i've inherited my brother's rockwell modem, which is a hsf, > meaning, as far as i know, it's a winmodem. so i took a look a > http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Conexant+Rockwell-modem-HOWTO/hsf.html > the ins

/proc permissions and hsf modems

2001-10-16 Thread andrej hocevar
lately i've inherited my brother's rockwell modem, which is a hsf, meaning, as far as i know, it's a winmodem. so i took a look a http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Conexant+Rockwell-modem-HOWTO/hsf.html the instruction say to change the content of /proc/pci. which is the problem -- i cannot do it as i

Proc Permissions Patch

1998-03-07 Thread matthew tebbens
Does anyone know of a kernel/other patch for limiting the output of process informationetc ? I've heard of the 'Proc Permissions Patch' but I don't know if there is something better, or if that patch is unstable or does not work correctly. Thanks. Matthew -- E-mail t