Ian Patrick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 09:38:30PM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
> > Ian Patrick Thomas wrote:
> > >
> > > I have been getting this message on bootup
> > >
> > > Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 09:38:30PM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
> Ian Patrick Thomas wrote:
> >
> > I have been getting this message on bootup
> >
> > Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than /lib/modules/`uname
> > -r`/modules.dep
> >
> > W
Ian Patrick Thomas wrote:
>
> I have been getting this message on bootup
>
> Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than /lib/modules/`uname
> -r`/modules.dep
>
> When I check, both have the same creation time. After searching on
> geocrawler I found a post
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 10:57:21PM -0500, Ian Patrick Thomas wrote:
| I have been getting this message on bootup
|
| Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than /lib/modules/`uname
-r`/modules.dep
| Any other suggestions or is this nothing to worry about?
Run 'update-modules' as root.
-D
I have been getting this message on bootup
Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than /lib/modules/`uname -r`/modules.dep
When I check, both have the same creation time. After searching on geocrawler
I found a post
where someone put the all the subdirectories of /lib/modules/`uname -r
will dissapear in a few hours.
Duncan Findlay
- Original Message -
From: "Joost Kooij" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Balbir Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than modules.dep ???
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 08:43:56PM -0500, Balbir Thomas wrote:
> hi,
> I keep getting the following error message at boot time:
>
> modprobe: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than
> /lib/modules/2.4.5/modules.dep
>
> On other occasions it is insmod that issues the mes
gt; >
> > > modprobe: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than
> > > /lib/modules/2.4.5/modules.dep
> > >
> > > On other occasions it is insmod that issues the message. I have had this
> > > problem since kernel 2.2.17. I am presently running kernel 2
gt; >
> > > modprobe: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than
> > > /lib/modules/2.4.5/modules.dep
> > >
> > > On other occasions it is insmod that issues the message. I have had this
> > > problem since kernel 2.2.17. I am presently running kernel 2
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 09:04:55PM -0500, ktb wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 08:43:56PM -0500, Balbir Thomas wrote:
> > hi,
> > I keep getting the following error message at boot time:
> >
> > modprobe: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than
> > /lib/modu
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 08:43:56PM -0500, Balbir Thomas wrote:
> hi,
> I keep getting the following error message at boot time:
>
> modprobe: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than
> /lib/modules/2.4.5/modules.dep
>
> On other occasions it is insmod that issues the mes
hi,
I keep getting the following error message at boot time:
modprobe: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than
/lib/modules/2.4.5/modules.dep
On other occasions it is insmod that issues the message. I have had this
problem since kernel 2.2.17. I am presently running kernel 2.4.5 compiled
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, Oct 25, 2000
at 06:49:53PM -0500
Erik,
I found the thread on debian-user where you and others were discussing the
problem with timestamps on /etc/modules.conf and /lib/modules/`uname
-r`/modules.dep:
http://lists.debian.org/debian
* Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [251000 18:09]:
> tjm wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have had the same problem although it doesn't seem to
> > cause any adverse condition with the machine.
The startup
> > script /etc/rcS.d/S20modutils (/etc/init.d/modutils) runs
> > depmod -a when the ma
* Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [251000 18:09]:
> tjm wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have had the same problem although it doesn't seem to
> > cause any adverse condition with the machine.
The startup
> > script /etc/rcS.d/S20modutils (/etc/init.d/modutils) runs
> > depmod -a when the mach
>
> Using Debian potato with a 2.2.17 kernel.
>
> > >
> > > > Oct 25 00:08:06 jojda insmod: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent
> > > > than /lib/m
> > > > odules/2.2.17/modules.dep
> > > >
> > > > is somewhat troublin
ime back temporarily to see if it makes a difference. A
proper solution would be much nicer, though.
Using Debian potato with a 2.2.17 kernel.
> >
> > > Oct 25 00:08:06 jojda insmod: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent
> > > than /lib/m
> > > odules/2.2.17/
>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 12:17:25AM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
>>
>> > Oct 25 00:08:06 jojda insmod: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent
>> > than /lib/m
>> > odules/2.2.17/modules.dep
>> >
>> > is somewhat troubling me, I
Philipp Schulte wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 12:17:25AM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
>
> > Oct 25 00:08:06 jojda insmod: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent
> > than /lib/m
> > odules/2.2.17/modules.dep
> >
> > is somewhat troubling me, I ha
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 12:17:25AM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
> Oct 25 00:08:06 jojda insmod: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent
> than /lib/m
> odules/2.2.17/modules.dep
>
> is somewhat troubling me, I have fairly plain debian unstable install,
> why do I get the message
the message in subject:
Oct 25 00:08:06 jojda insmod: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent
than /lib/m
odules/2.2.17/modules.dep
is somewhat troubling me, I have fairly plain debian unstable install,
why do I get the message?
I tried to figure out why is the /etc/modules.conf newer than
On 22-Oct-99 Martin Fluch wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Pollywog wrote:
>
>> > On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 01:25:50AM -0400, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote:
>> >> This is a know bug in the modutils package. See the bugs page on
>> >> this.
>> >
>> > Where is this bugs page?
>>
>> I could not find it ei
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 01:25:50AM -0400, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote:
> > This is a know bug in the modutils package. See the bugs page on
>
> Where is this bugs page?
http://bugs.debian.org/modutils
In particular, see Bug#47830.
> > Solution is t
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Solution is to add the file /etc/modutils/paths and add
> > entries for each one of subdirectories under /lib/modules/2.2.12/.
>
> Are there any more specific docs to read about setting up this file?
man modules.conf
Martin
--
If the box says '
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Pollywog wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 01:25:50AM -0400, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote:
> >> This is a know bug in the modutils package. See the bugs page on
> >> this.
> >
> > Where is this bugs page?
>
> I could not find it either, though I did find one that seemed to be
On 22-Oct-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the prompt reply.
> I have a few more questions if you are willing to answer them.
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 01:25:50AM -0400, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote:
>> This is a know bug in the modutils package. See the bugs page on
>> this.
>
Hi,
Thanks for the prompt reply.
I have a few more questions if you are willing to answer them.
On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 01:25:50AM -0400, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote:
> This is a know bug in the modutils package. See the bugs page on
> this.
Where is this bugs page?
> Solution is to add the file
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have only recently upgraded my kernel to 2.2.12.
> The error below is returned after trying to install a new module:
>
> Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than /lib/modules/2.2.12/modules.dep
> opl3sa: dma, irq and io mu
Hi,
I have only recently upgraded my kernel to 2.2.12.
The error below is returned after trying to install a new module:
Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than /lib/modules/2.2.12/modules.dep
opl3sa: dma, irq and io must be set.
/lib/modules/2.2.12/misc/opl3sa.o: init_module: Device or
29 matches
Mail list logo
