Alphonse Ogulla wrote:
> I get the following two warning messages on startup.
> 1) warning: cannot open /etc/mtab. no such file or directory
> and
> 2) warning: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than
> /lib/modules/2.4.18-686/modules.dep...
I have not tracked down either of thos
I get the following two warning messages on startup.
1) warning: cannot open /etc/mtab. no such file or directory
and
2) warning: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than
/lib/modules/2.4.18-686/modules.dep...
AFAIC, /etc/mtab is created on startup. Then why the warning in first place?
In the
"J" == J F Gratton writes:
J> I might be using workarounds or not using my system effeciently
J> but I've never had to tamper with /etc/modules.conf.
J> All I did so far to get modules to load and to work was to put
J> them into /etc/modules.
; 'update-modules' as root, which reads this, as well as some files in
> > /etc/modutils/, to *create* /etc/modules.conf. (This script is run as
> > part of /etc/init.d/modutils at boot time, in case you're wondering why
> > you haven't run it yourself and things s
;update-modules' as root, which reads this, as well as
> > some files in /etc/modutils/, to *create* /etc/modules.conf. (This
> > script is run as part of /etc/init.d/modutils at boot time, in case
> > you're wondering why you haven't run it yourself and things still
&
karounds or not using my system effeciently but
> >>I've never had to tamper with /etc/modules.conf.
> >>
> >>All I did so far to get modules to load and to work was to put them into
> >>/etc/modules.
> >>
> >>For instance: on a 2.
Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
-- J.F.Gratton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Thursday, 20 February 2003, 09:53 PM -0500):
I might be using workarounds or not using my system effeciently but
I've never had to tamper with /etc/modules.conf.
All I did so far to get modules to
/etc/modutils/, to *create* /etc/modules.conf. (This script is run as
> part of /etc/init.d/modutils at boot time, in case you're wondering why
> you haven't run it yourself and things still worked.)
>
> There's a lot more to it, and this answer is definitely a bit
>
J.F.Gratton wrote:
Good evening,
I might have missed that one, concerning /etc/modules, /etc/modules.conf
and modutils..
What does what in there ?
I might be using workarounds or not using my system effeciently but
I've never had to tamper with /etc/modules.conf.
All I did so far t
-- J.F.Gratton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Thursday, 20 February 2003, 09:53 PM -0500):
> I might be using workarounds or not using my system effeciently but
> I've never had to tamper with /etc/modules.conf.
>
> All I did so far to get modules to load and to wo
Good evening,
I might have missed that one, concerning /etc/modules, /etc/modules.conf
and modutils..
What does what in there ?
I might be using workarounds or not using my system effeciently but
I've never had to tamper with /etc/modules.conf.
All I did so far to get modules to loa
"Ross" == Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ross> I read the man pages. They didn't answer the questions I
Ross> had; the one for modules in particular is quite terse.
Yes, they are very terse and things are fairly confusing. When I said
"read the manuals for details" I meant j
I read the man pages. They didn't answer the questions I had; the one
for modules in particular is quite terse.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Ross" == Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ross> What is the relation of /etc/modules to /etc/modules.conf?
Ross> Which runs first?
/etc/modules.conf controls the behavior of modprobe.
/etc/modules is a list of modules loaded at system boot.
What is the relation of /etc/modules to /etc/modules.conf?
Which runs first?
Do options in modules.conf get picked up by the modules specified in
/etc/modules?
Do they get picked up even if the line in /etc/modules specifies some
options?
Do modules listed in /etc/modules get loaded by modprobe
Ian Patrick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 09:38:30PM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
> > Ian Patrick Thomas wrote:
> > >
> > > I have been getting this message on bootup
> > >
> > > Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 09:38:30PM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
> Ian Patrick Thomas wrote:
> >
> > I have been getting this message on bootup
> >
> > Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than /lib/modules/`uname
> > -r`/modules.dep
> >
> > W
Ian Patrick Thomas wrote:
>
> I have been getting this message on bootup
>
> Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than /lib/modules/`uname
> -r`/modules.dep
>
> When I check, both have the same creation time. After searching on
> geocrawler I found a post
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 10:57:21PM -0500, Ian Patrick Thomas wrote:
| I have been getting this message on bootup
|
| Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than /lib/modules/`uname
-r`/modules.dep
| Any other suggestions or is this nothing to worry about?
Run 'update-modules' as root.
-D
I have been getting this message on bootup
Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than /lib/modules/`uname -r`/modules.dep
When I check, both have the same creation time. After searching on geocrawler
I found a post
where someone put the all the subdirectories of /lib/modules/`uname -r
will dissapear in a few hours.
Duncan Findlay
- Original Message -
From: "Joost Kooij" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Balbir Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than modules.dep ???
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 08:43:56PM -0500, Balbir Thomas wrote:
> hi,
> I keep getting the following error message at boot time:
>
> modprobe: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than
> /lib/modules/2.4.5/modules.dep
>
> On other occasions it is insmod that issues the mes
gt; it more
> > > recent . On the next boot something reverses the situation again .
> > >
> > > This has not caused any program to fail as yet but it is still a nagging
> > > messg.
> > >
> >
> > Could you please post "ls -l" o
gt; it more
> > > recent . On the next boot something reverses the situation again .
> > >
> > > This has not caused any program to fail as yet but it is still a nagging
> > > messg.
> > >
> >
> > Could you please post "ls -l" of bo
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 09:04:55PM -0500, ktb wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 08:43:56PM -0500, Balbir Thomas wrote:
> > hi,
> > I keep getting the following error message at boot time:
> >
> > modprobe: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than
> > /lib/modu
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 08:43:56PM -0500, Balbir Thomas wrote:
> hi,
> I keep getting the following error message at boot time:
>
> modprobe: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than
> /lib/modules/2.4.5/modules.dep
>
> On other occasions it is insmod that issues the mes
hi,
I keep getting the following error message at boot time:
modprobe: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than
/lib/modules/2.4.5/modules.dep
On other occasions it is insmod that issues the message. I have had this
problem since kernel 2.2.17. I am presently running kernel 2.4.5 compiled
command:
$SIMULATE modprobe $module -C $Target/etc/modules.conf =>
modprobe loop -C /etc/modules.conf
loop.o is present under /lib/modules/2.4.4, which leads me to suspect
that modules.conf should explain why loop.o cannot be found, but
snd-ac97-codec can, which also resides under /lib/mod
Hi,
I'm running Debian unstable with a custom kernel and have a couple of
questions I hope someone can help with or point me at the right docs.
After configuring and installing my new kernel, at boot at get several
notes that /etc/modules.conf is more recent than /lib/modules/2.2.
*/module
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, Oct 25, 2000
at 06:49:53PM -0500
Erik,
I found the thread on debian-user where you and others were discussing the
problem with timestamps on /etc/modules.conf and /lib/modules/`uname
-r`/modules.dep:
http://lists.debi
* Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [251000 18:09]:
> tjm wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have had the same problem although it doesn't seem to
> > cause any adverse condition with the machine.
The startup
> > script /etc/rcS.d/S20modutils (/etc/init.d/modutils) runs
> > depmod -a when the ma
* Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [251000 18:09]:
> tjm wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have had the same problem although it doesn't seem to
> > cause any adverse condition with the machine.
The startup
> > script /etc/rcS.d/S20modutils (/etc/init.d/modutils) runs
> > depmod -a when the mach
>
> Using Debian potato with a 2.2.17 kernel.
>
> > >
> > > > Oct 25 00:08:06 jojda insmod: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent
> > > > than /lib/m
> > > > odules/2.2.17/modules.dep
> > > >
> > > > is somewhat troublin
ime back temporarily to see if it makes a difference. A
proper solution would be much nicer, though.
Using Debian potato with a 2.2.17 kernel.
> >
> > > Oct 25 00:08:06 jojda insmod: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent
> > > than /lib/m
> > > odules/2.2.17/
>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 12:17:25AM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
>>
>> > Oct 25 00:08:06 jojda insmod: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent
>> > than /lib/m
>> > odules/2.2.17/modules.dep
>> >
>> > is somewhat troubling me, I
Philipp Schulte wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 12:17:25AM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
>
> > Oct 25 00:08:06 jojda insmod: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent
> > than /lib/m
> > odules/2.2.17/modules.dep
> >
> > is somewhat troubling me, I ha
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 12:17:25AM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
> Oct 25 00:08:06 jojda insmod: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent
> than /lib/m
> odules/2.2.17/modules.dep
>
> is somewhat troubling me, I have fairly plain debian unstable install,
> why do I get the message
the message in subject:
Oct 25 00:08:06 jojda insmod: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent
than /lib/m
odules/2.2.17/modules.dep
is somewhat troubling me, I have fairly plain debian unstable install,
why do I get the message?
I tried to figure out why is the /etc/modules.conf newer than
On 22-Oct-99 Martin Fluch wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Pollywog wrote:
>
>> > On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 01:25:50AM -0400, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote:
>> >> This is a know bug in the modutils package. See the bugs page on
>> >> this.
>> >
>> > Where is this bugs page?
>>
>> I could not find it ei
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 01:25:50AM -0400, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote:
> > This is a know bug in the modutils package. See the bugs page on
>
> Where is this bugs page?
http://bugs.debian.org/modutils
In particular, see Bug#47830.
> > Solution is t
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Solution is to add the file /etc/modutils/paths and add
> > entries for each one of subdirectories under /lib/modules/2.2.12/.
>
> Are there any more specific docs to read about setting up this file?
man modules.conf
Martin
--
If the box says '
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Pollywog wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 01:25:50AM -0400, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote:
> >> This is a know bug in the modutils package. See the bugs page on
> >> this.
> >
> > Where is this bugs page?
>
> I could not find it either, though I did find one that seemed to be
On 22-Oct-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the prompt reply.
> I have a few more questions if you are willing to answer them.
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 01:25:50AM -0400, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote:
>> This is a know bug in the modutils package. See the bugs page on
>> this.
>
Hi,
Thanks for the prompt reply.
I have a few more questions if you are willing to answer them.
On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 01:25:50AM -0400, Jean Pierre LeJacq wrote:
> This is a know bug in the modutils package. See the bugs page on
> this.
Where is this bugs page?
> Solution is to add the file
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have only recently upgraded my kernel to 2.2.12.
> The error below is returned after trying to install a new module:
>
> Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than /lib/modules/2.2.12/modules.dep
> opl3sa: dma, irq and io mu
Hi,
I have only recently upgraded my kernel to 2.2.12.
The error below is returned after trying to install a new module:
Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than /lib/modules/2.2.12/modules.dep
opl3sa: dma, irq and io must be set.
/lib/modules/2.2.12/misc/opl3sa.o: init_module: Device or
46 matches
Mail list logo
