Re: webcam /dev/video missing / ERROR opening V4L interface

2014-01-23 Thread Robin
On 22 January 2014 17:29, Robin wrote: > Was working a couple of months ago, now it's not. > > Sid: 3.12-1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.12.8-1 (2014-01-19) x86_64 GNU/Linux > and 3.11-2 debian kernels > > ls /dev/video > ls: cannot access /dev/video: No such file or director

webcam /dev/video missing / ERROR opening V4L interface

2014-01-22 Thread Robin
Was working a couple of months ago, now it's not. Sid: 3.12-1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.12.8-1 (2014-01-19) x86_64 GNU/Linux and 3.11-2 debian kernels ls /dev/video ls: cannot access /dev/video: No such file or directory webcam logitech c920 lsusb Bus 009 Device 009: ID 046d:082d Logitech, In

Re: Udev. Problems with ordering hardware using /dev/video

2007-08-01 Thread Nigel Henry
ny a few more times to see if this is now consistent regarding the video devices. > > My experience with network cards was that the NAME assignments sometimes > did not work reliably if I tried to use them to swap two existing > (kernel) names (i.e. eth0 and eth1). If you have similar

Re: Udev. Problems with ordering hardware using /dev/video

2007-08-01 Thread Florian Kulzer
to swap two existing (kernel) names (i.e. eth0 and eth1). If you have similar problems then it is probably best to replace the two NAME assignments in the rules by two SYMLINK directives: ### START ### SUBSYSTEM=="video4linux", \ ATTR{name}=="BT878 video _Hauppauge _bt878__"

Re: Udev. Problems with ordering hardware using /dev/video

2007-08-01 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:34:27 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:21:27PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote: > > > This flip-flopping is, AFAIK, more the fault of the newer kernel then > > the fault of udev. If the kernel would always load the modules in the > > same order

Re: Udev. Problems with ordering hardware using /dev/video

2007-08-01 Thread Douglas Allan Tutty
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:21:27PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote: > This flip-flopping is, AFAIK, more the fault of the newer kernel then > the fault of udev. If the kernel would always load the modules in the > same order then udev would probably assign the device nodes in a > consistent manner.

Re: Udev. Problems with ordering hardware using /dev/video

2007-07-31 Thread Nigel Henry
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 23:21, Florian Kulzer wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 19:47:51 +0200, Nigel Henry wrote: > > I've managed to resolve most of my problems on my own, but Udev has > > beaten me. > > > > Sarge is not a problem, as it's using the 2.4.27, or 2.6.8 kernel, and > > Udev is not in

Re: Udev. Problems with ordering hardware using /dev/video

2007-07-31 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 19:47:51 +0200, Nigel Henry wrote: > I've managed to resolve most of my problems on my own, but Udev has beaten me. > > Sarge is not a problem, as it's using the 2.4.27, or 2.6.8 kernel, and Udev > is > not in the equation. Etch has a 2.6.8, and a 2.6.17 kernel, and Lenny

Re: Udev. Problems with ordering hardware using /dev/video

2007-07-31 Thread Mumia W..
On 07/31/2007 12:47 PM, Nigel Henry wrote: I've managed to resolve most of my problems on my own, but Udev has beaten me. Sarge is not a problem, as it's using the 2.4.27, or 2.6.8 kernel, and Udev is not in the equation. Etch has a 2.6.8, and a 2.6.17 kernel, and Lenny has a 2.6.11, and a 2.6

Udev. Problems with ordering hardware using /dev/video

2007-07-31 Thread Nigel Henry
I've managed to resolve most of my problems on my own, but Udev has beaten me. Sarge is not a problem, as it's using the 2.4.27, or 2.6.8 kernel, and Udev is not in the equation. Etch has a 2.6.8, and a 2.6.17 kernel, and Lenny has a 2.6.11, and a 2.6.17 kernel. The problem is with the 2.6.17 ke

Re: /dev/video absent

2006-07-17 Thread kruton
m the net says to compile a certain driver against the kernel headers. But there are no /dev/video* devices. I have put the v4l module (videodev) using modconf. lsmod gives the following list: Module Size Used by quickcam 91336 0 smbfs 55800 0 usb

Re: /dev/video absent

2006-07-16 Thread kruton
-- "Edward Shornock (debian ml)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 02:33:46AM -0700, kruton > wrote: > > well, the initial goal was to get a webcam > working. > > doing some digging i see that there is no > /dev/video.. > > so >

Re: /dev/video absent

2006-07-16 Thread Edward Shornock (debian ml)
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 02:33:46AM -0700, kruton wrote: > well, the initial goal was to get a webcam working. > doing some digging i see that there is no /dev/video.. > so > > cd /dev; ./MAKEDEV video > > seemed like an option.. it said > > udev active, device

/dev/video absent

2006-07-16 Thread kruton
well, the initial goal was to get a webcam working. doing some digging i see that there is no /dev/video.. so cd /dev; ./MAKEDEV video seemed like an option.. it said udev active, devices will be created in /dev/.static/dev/ what is this? how do i get v4l support into the machine? and

km module doesn't create /dev/video

2006-03-15 Thread Tim Beauregard
with+ATI+graphics+card%3F&_done=%2Fgroup%2Flinux.debian.user%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F5c0e9592af19359b%2Fd713968e5b497630%3Fq%3DRe%3A+How+to+capture+video+with+ATI+graphics+card%3F%26rnum%3D1%26#doc_86d99632ff843e84 I have the km_drv and km_api_drv modules loaded but there is no /dev/video Am I ba

Re: /dev/video

2002-05-06 Thread David Wright
Have you tried mknod mknod /dev/video0 c 81 0 ln -s /dev/video0 /dev/video see linuxusbguide.sourceforge.net and read the USB-guide for more information Yes, thanks, this works (and don't forget chgrp video /dev/video* either.) But I had thought that Debian was set

Re: /dev/video

2002-05-06 Thread John Habermann
Have you tried mknod mknod /dev/video0 c 81 0 ln -s /dev/video0 /dev/video see linuxusbguide.sourceforge.net and read the USB-guide for more information John Habermann On Sat, 4 May 2002 09:11, David Wright wrote: > I am running sid. I just plugged a Logitech Pro 3000 Quick

Re: /dev/video

2002-05-03 Thread David Wright
Try: 'insmode videodev' Thanks for the tip, but videodev had already been loaded. MAKEDEV still doesn't prduce a /dev/video. Do you have one? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: /dev/video

2002-05-03 Thread Rick Pasotto
video0, which is what > applications like gnomemeeting look for. If I > # cd /dev > # ./MAKEDEV -v update > it says (after lots else) > ./MAKEDEV: don't know what "tts" is > ./MAKEDEV: don't know what "video_capture" is > ./MAKEDEV: don

/dev/video

2002-05-03 Thread David Wright
update it says (after lots else) ./MAKEDEV: don't know what "tts" is ./MAKEDEV: don't know what "video_capture" is ./MAKEDEV: don't know what "drm" is but doesn't generate any /dev/video entries. What do I need to do to get video capt

Re: /dev/video: Operation not permitted

2000-10-05 Thread Nate Amsden
m detected. > Oct 3 16:11:37 eme_lap kernel: pwc Registered as /dev/video0. > > Which looks allright to me. > Any attempts to access /dev/video or /dev/video0 result in: > > /dev/video: Operation not permitted > > Leaves me pretty clue less... > Ann

Re: /dev/video: Operation not permitted

2000-10-05 Thread Erik van der Meulen
. Oct 3 16:11:37 eme_lap kernel: usb.c: registered new driver Philips webcam Oct 3 16:11:37 eme_lap kernel: pwc Philips PCVC680K USB webcam detected. Oct 3 16:11:37 eme_lap kernel: pwc Registered as /dev/video0. Which looks allright to me. Any attempts to access /dev/video or /dev/video0

Re: /dev/video: Operation not permitted

2000-10-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sounds like the driver may not be loaded right. havent been following the thread but what kind of device are you trying to use on /dev/video and what drivers are loaded to use it ? nate On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Erik van der Meulen wrote: e.van. >On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 20:12:45 +0200, Jen

Re: /dev/video: Operation not permitted

2000-10-03 Thread Erik van der Meulen
On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 20:12:45 +0200, Jens P. Elsner wrote: > > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root6 Oct 3 17:19 /dev/video -> > > video0 > > > > Have I overlooked some obvious thing? > Yes. /dev/video is a symlink. :) > > how about you set

Re: /dev/video: Operation not permitted

2000-10-03 Thread Jens P. Elsner
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root6 Oct 3 17:19 /dev/video -> > video0 > > Have I overlooked some obvious thing? Yes. /dev/video is a symlink. :) how about you set the right permissions on /dev/video0 ? jp

/dev/video: Operation not permitted

2000-10-03 Thread Erik van der Meulen
. If I start: xawtv -c /dev/video -geometry 352x288-0+0 I get: This is xawtv-3.06, running on Linux/i686 (2.2.17) visual: id=0x22 class=4 (TrueColor), depth=16 x11: 1024x768, 16 bit/pixel, 2048 byte/scanline, DGA, VidMode can't open /dev/video: Operation not permitted waitpid: No

Re: xawtv (no /dev/video)

1999-08-10 Thread Colin Marquardt
* NatePuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > can't open /dev/video: No such file or directory... > no video grabber device available. > When I did a ./MAKEDEV from /dev directory the proggy said > ./MAKEDEV: don't know how to make device "vide

Re: xawtv (no /dev/video)

1999-08-10 Thread Syrus Nemat-Nasser
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, NatePuri wrote: > On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 10:19:40PM -0700, Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, NatePuri wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 04:48:21AM +0200, Bernhard Rieder wrote: > > > > ln -s /dev/video0 /dev/video &

Re: xawtv (no /dev/video)

1999-08-10 Thread Bernhard Rieder
NatePuri wrote: > Now the problem that I'm having now that it starts up, and I have > edited the .xawtv file with my channels in it, I just get a blue screen > and no video. Looks like you selected a wrong input source. Do You have a source= in your ~/.xawtv ? -- ~/.xawtv ---

Re: xawtv (no /dev/video)

1999-08-10 Thread NatePuri
On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 12:09:55PM +0200, Bernhard Rieder wrote: > NatePuri wrote: > > > > I don't have /dev/video0 either. > If you did already MAKEDEV video and it didn't work > then you have to make your video device manually > > mknod /dev/video0 c 81 0 Ok, I did this... > Also you should be

Re: xawtv (no /dev/video)

1999-08-10 Thread Bernhard Rieder
NatePuri wrote: > > > I don't have /dev/video0 either. If you did already MAKEDEV video and it didn't work then you have to make your video device manually mknod /dev/video0 c 81 0 Also you should be shure that the kernel loads msp3400 and tuner. The depencies in the kernel seem to be broken so t

Re: xawtv (no /dev/video)

1999-08-10 Thread NatePuri
On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 10:19:40PM -0700, Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote: > On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, NatePuri wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 04:48:21AM +0200, Bernhard Rieder wrote: > > > ln -s /dev/video0 /dev/video > > > > I don't have /dev/video0 either.

Re: xawtv (no /dev/video)

1999-08-10 Thread Syrus Nemat-Nasser
On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, NatePuri wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 04:48:21AM +0200, Bernhard Rieder wrote: > > ln -s /dev/video0 /dev/video > > I don't have /dev/video0 either. Did you compile your kernel with support for your video grabber

Re: xawtv (no /dev/video)

1999-08-10 Thread NatePuri
On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 04:48:21AM +0200, Bernhard Rieder wrote: > ln -s /dev/video0 /dev/video I don't have /dev/video0 either. > -- >__ ___ > // )___--"""-. > \ |,"( /`--"

Re: xawtv (no /dev/video)

1999-08-10 Thread Bernhard Rieder
NatePuri wrote: > > When I open xawtv from an xterm I get this error > > can't open /dev/video: No such file or directory... > no video grabber device available. > > When I did a ./MAKEDEV from /dev directory the proggy said > ./MAKEDEV:

xawtv (no /dev/video)

1999-08-10 Thread NatePuri
When I open xawtv from an xterm I get this error can't open /dev/video: No such file or directory... no video grabber device available. When I did a ./MAKEDEV from /dev directory the proggy said ./MAKEDEV: don't know how to make device "video". Do I