Re: /dev/ttyS0 permissions changing...

2001-02-09 Thread John Hasler
David Wright writes: > I think the problem when using wvdial is simply that the latter is too > impatient. Wvdial claims that is sends SIGTERM to pppd, waits 2 seconds > and then sends SIGKILL. Please file a bug agains wvdial. Pppd quite often takes quite a while to shut down: for example, my ISP

Re: /dev/ttyS0 permissions changing...

2001-02-09 Thread David Wright
Quoting Bob Hilliard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Hugo van der Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Something on my machine is periodically changing /dev/ttyS0's > > permissions to 640, whereas it needs to be 660 to use the modem > > ppp changes the permissions to 640 on the device it is using,

Re: /dev/ttyS0 permissions changing...

2001-02-07 Thread MaD dUCK
also sprach Bob Hilliard (on Wed, 07 Feb 2001 02:52:22PM -0500): > ppp changes the permissions to 640 on the device it is using, and > restores them when it exits. If it exits abnormally (crash, kill -9, > etc) the permissions are not restored. I have suspected that it does > not always rest

Re: /dev/ttyS0 permissions changing...

2001-02-07 Thread Bob Hilliard
Hugo van der Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Something on my machine is periodically changing /dev/ttyS0's > permissions to 640, whereas it needs to be 660 to use the modem ppp changes the permissions to 640 on the device it is using, and restores them when it exits. If it exits abnorma

Re: /dev/ttyS0 permissions changing...

2001-02-07 Thread David Wright
Quoting Hugo van der Merwe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Something on my machine is periodically changing /dev/ttyS0's > permissions to 640, whereas it needs to be 660 to use the modem... I > have now switched back to using ttyS1, but on laptops with only one > serial port this is not an option, so I'm s

/dev/ttyS0 permissions changing...

2001-02-07 Thread Hugo van der Merwe
Hello, Something on my machine is periodically changing /dev/ttyS0's permissions to 640, whereas it needs to be 660 to use the modem... I have now switched back to using ttyS1, but on laptops with only one serial port this is not an option, so I'm still wondering what it is that does this. I also

Problems of /dev/ttyS0 permissions using wvdial

2000-06-07 Thread Francois Fayard
Hello, I use wmppp to start and stop my ppp-connexion. Everything works well, but sometimes I have problems with my permissions on /dev/ttyS0 (my modem) that are changed. I'm obliged to do a chmod g+rw /dev/ttyS0 to reconfigure my permissions. my starting script is : wvdial my stopping script is :

Re: /dev/ttyS0 permissions

1998-05-01 Thread Lindsay Allen
Something else that may be relevant to this thread is mgetty.conf. Mine certainly messes with /dev/ttySx. # use these options to make the /dev/tty-device owned by "uucp.uucp" # and mode "rw-rw-r--" (0664). *LEADING ZERO NEEDED!* port-owner uucp port-group uucp # port-owner dialout # port-group

Re: /dev/ttyS0 permissions

1998-04-30 Thread C.J.LAWSON
What are the permissions on /dev/ttyS0 ? === In any war, the first casualty is the truth. --anon On Wed, 29 Apr 199

Re: /dev/ttyS0 permissions

1998-04-30 Thread Johann Spies
On Wed, 29 Apr 1998, Bob Hilliard wrote: > /dev/ttyS0 should have 660 permissions. I frequently find my > /dev/ttyS1 has changed to 640. This can be caused by pppd terminating > abnormally, and perhaps by other events. Is there some place in the documentation where one can see what the per

Re: /dev/ttyS0 permissions

1998-04-30 Thread Rev. Joseph Carter
On Wed, Apr 29, 1998 at 11:14:06PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote: > > > /dev/ttyS0 should have 660 permissions. I frequently find my > > > /dev/ttyS1 has changed to 640. This can be caused by pppd terminating > > > abnormally, and perhaps by other events. > > > > I knew it, I knew it, I knew it

Re: /dev/ttyS0 permissions

1998-04-30 Thread Bob Hilliard
"Rev. Joseph Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > /dev/ttyS0 should have 660 permissions. I frequently find my > > /dev/ttyS1 has changed to 640. This can be caused by pppd terminating > > abnormally, and perhaps by other events. > > I knew it, I knew it, I knew it! heh > > Sounds like

Re: /dev/ttyS0 permissions

1998-04-30 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Rev. Joseph Carter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 1998 at 08:40:35PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote: > > /dev/ttyS0 should have 660 permissions. I frequently find my > > /dev/ttyS1 has changed to 640. This can be caused by pppd terminating > > abnormally, and perhaps by other even

Re: /dev/ttyS0 permissions

1998-04-30 Thread Rev. Joseph Carter
On Wed, Apr 29, 1998 at 08:40:35PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote: > /dev/ttyS0 should have 660 permissions. I frequently find my > /dev/ttyS1 has changed to 640. This can be caused by pppd terminating > abnormally, and perhaps by other events. I knew it, I knew it, I knew it! heh Sounds like

Re: /dev/ttyS0 permissions

1998-04-30 Thread Bob Hilliard
/dev/ttyS0 should have 660 permissions. I frequently find my /dev/ttyS1 has changed to 640. This can be caused by pppd terminating abnormally, and perhaps by other events. Bob -- _ |_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |_) (_) |_) Palm City, FL USAPGP

Re: /dev/ttyS0 permissions

1998-04-30 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
Also, if you changed /etc/group which you were logged in you need to log in afresh in order for the group addition to take affect. Bob Nielsen wrote: > I have /dev/ttyS0 shown as belonging to group dialout and have added my > username to the dialout group, but I get > > cannot open /dev/ttyS0: Pe

Re: /dev/ttyS0 permissions

1998-04-30 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
Did you check 'ls -l /dev/ttyS0' to make sure the group ownership on the file is not 'dip' rather than 'dialout' (although I think it should be dialout on my system, debian 1.3.1, it was set up as group dip). Bob Nielsen wrote: > I have /dev/ttyS0 shown as belonging to group dialout and have adde

/dev/ttyS0 permissions

1998-04-29 Thread Bob Nielsen
I have /dev/ttyS0 shown as belonging to group dialout and have added my username to the dialout group, but I get cannot open /dev/ttyS0: Permission denied errors with both minicom and efax. I'd rather not run these as root. Did I miss something? Bob Bob Nielsen Interne