Re: /dev/hda10

2000-05-25 Thread kmself
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 11:22:05AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 05:08:01PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > > Could anyone please tell me what I have to do to access /dev/hda10? I can > > create it easily but trying to access it I get an 'unconfigured dev

Re: /dev/hda10

2000-05-25 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 01:13:32PM +0930, John Pearson wrote: [snip] > $ /sbin/swapon -s > FilenameTypeSizeUsedPriority > /dev/hda2 partition 128516 2108-1 > /dev/hda3 partition 128516 0

Re: /dev/hda10

2000-05-25 Thread Michael Meskes
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 11:39:28PM +0200, Patrick wrote: > At the end of my fdisk I had : > Calling ioctl() to re-read partition table. > Re-read table failed with error 16: Device or resource busy. > Reboot your system to ensure the partition table is updated. Sure had this too. And thinking abou

Re: /dev/hda10

2000-05-25 Thread Michael Meskes
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 11:45:08AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > Could be, but why would you want 10 partitions? :) One for Windows (unfortunately), one for Stormix, one for Corel, one for Debian (the system usually running :-)), one for testing other distros, one /home, one swap, one to store data

Re: /dev/hda10

2000-05-25 Thread Michael Meskes
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 11:22:05AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > Can you tell me exactly how you have 10 partitons? Even the sun disk label > only allows for 8. And i386 can have a max of 7(?) with extended > partitions enabled. According to kernel docs I can use up to 64. I need several operating s

Re: /dev/hda10

2000-05-25 Thread Pat Mahoney
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 11:22:05AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 05:08:01PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > > Could anyone please tell me what I have to do to access /dev/hda10? I can > > create it easily but trying to access it I get an 'unconfigured dev

Re: /dev/hda10

2000-05-24 Thread John Pearson
2 0% /var/spool/mail /dev/hda8 497667 13 471952 0% /var/spool/pop /dev/hda9 11890501366 1126237 0% /var/log /dev/hda10497667 13 471952 0% /tmp /dev/hdc17956307 2722158 4821682 36% /ftp $ /sbin/swapon

Re: /dev/hda10

2000-05-24 Thread Brad
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 11:39:28PM +0200, Patrick wrote: > > I've found out that with (some ?) 2.2.x kernels you seem to need to reboot the > computer between an fdisk and an mke2fs to get ride of 'unconfigured > device'. > It doesn't matter which /dev/hda?? it is, as soon as some /dev/hda > parti

Re: /dev/hda10

2000-05-24 Thread Peter Good
Also, it may be a dual boot windows/linux machine, which makes /dev/hda10 only the 6th partition. least that's how it works on mine /dev/hda1 (doze) /dev/hda5 (linux) /dev/hda6 (var) /dev/hda7 (home) /dev/hda8 (swp) Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- &

Re: /dev/hda10

2000-05-24 Thread Patrick
Le Wed, May 24, 2000 at 05:08:01PM +0200, Michael Meskes a dit: > Could anyone please tell me what I have to do to access /dev/hda10? I can > create it easily but trying to access it I get an 'unconfigured device' > message for instance from mke2fs. Do I need a special boot ti

Re: /dev/hda10

2000-05-24 Thread Lee Elliott
Ben Collins wrote: > > On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 05:08:01PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > > Could anyone please tell me what I have to do to access /dev/hda10? I can > > create it easily but trying to access it I get an 'unconfigured device' > > message for

Re: /dev/hda10

2000-05-24 Thread Kenneth Scharf
>On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 05:08:01PM +0200, Michael >Meskes wrote: >> Could anyone please tell me what I have to do to >>access /dev/hda10? I >>can > create it easily but trying to access it I get an >>'unconfigured >>device' >> message fo

Re: /dev/hda10

2000-05-24 Thread Ray Olszewski
y, you daisy-chain the extended partitions (think linked list, though it's technically a bit different). I'm also puzzled by the initial question. Every Debian install I've done created /dev/hda10 as part of the install process. Perhaps the original poster made a mistake when creat

Re: /dev/hda10

2000-05-24 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Could be, but why would you want 10 partitions? :) > i've see that ... > And does the kernel support this (yes I know fdisk can easily support > something like this, but that doesn't mean the kernel does). > according to devices.txt up to hd?63 wo

Re: /dev/hda10

2000-05-24 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 05:39:32PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > And i386 can have a max of 7(?) with extended partitions enabled. > > > not sure, but this sounds very strange to me. > afaik, you can nest extended patitions as much as you want. Could be, but why would you want 10 partition

Re: /dev/hda10

2000-05-24 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
> And i386 can have a max of 7(?) with extended partitions enabled. > not sure, but this sounds very strange to me. afaik, you can nest extended patitions as much as you want. -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please! -- If Windows is the answer, I want the problems

Re: /dev/hda10

2000-05-24 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 05:08:01PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > Could anyone please tell me what I have to do to access /dev/hda10? I can > create it easily but trying to access it I get an 'unconfigured device' > message for instance from mke2fs. Do I need a special boot t

/dev/hda10

2000-05-24 Thread Michael Meskes
Could anyone please tell me what I have to do to access /dev/hda10? I can create it easily but trying to access it I get an 'unconfigured device' message for instance from mke2fs. Do I need a special boot time parameter? Michael P.S.: Please CC me on replies. -- Michael Meskes M