Re: /bin/sh and ash, bash

2000-01-02 Thread Brian Servis
*- On 2 Jan, Ben Collins wrote about "Re: /bin/sh and ash, bash" > On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 03:34:51PM -0600, matt garman wrote: >> >> I noticed that Debian makes /bin/sh a symlink to /bin/bash by default. >> I'd rather have /bin/sh link to /bin/ash. I tri

Re: /bin/sh and ash, bash

2000-01-02 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 03:34:51PM -0600, matt garman wrote: > > I noticed that Debian makes /bin/sh a symlink to /bin/bash by default. > I'd rather have /bin/sh link to /bin/ash. I tried this quite a while > ago, and it seems as though some Debian-specific scripts rely on /bin/sh > actually bein

/bin/sh and ash, bash

2000-01-02 Thread matt garman
I noticed that Debian makes /bin/sh a symlink to /bin/bash by default. I'd rather have /bin/sh link to /bin/ash. I tried this quite a while ago, and it seems as though some Debian-specific scripts rely on /bin/sh actually being bash. In other words, last time I linked /bin/sh to /bin/ash, a few