rtnetz...@windstream.net (12024-04-18):
> As I understand what he wrote, the SPAM tag is added after the message leaves
> his control.
I very much doubt it, we would see “*SPAM* Re:” rather than
“Re: *SPAM*”.
And his recent “Sorry” mail was not tagged.
https://lists.debian.org/d
As I understand what he wrote, the SPAM tag is added after the message leaves
his control.
- Original Message -
From: "Nicolas George"
To: "debian-user"
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2024 11:13:44 AM
Subject: Re: *SPAM* Marking as spam [was: *SPAM***** Re:
Hans (12024-04-18):
> As I can not fix it
You can manually remove “*SPAM*” from the mail when you reply.
You could even automate it on your end.
--
Nicolas George
Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2024, 11:53:38 CEST schrieb to...@tuxteam.de:
Hi Tomas,
this is by debian servers, I talked about this for a while. Because the debian
servers mark some things in the header, megamailservers.eu mark them as spam
and add SPAM to the headline.
As I can not fix it
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:35:58 +
Andy Smith wrote:
Hello Andy,
>I suspect that your text above has come out sounding more entitled
>than you intended, as English is not your first language.
In fairness to Hans, he did go on to explain as much.
--
Regards _ "Valid sig separator is {d
Hi Hans,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:38:18AM +0200, Hans wrote:
> I only hope, it will not happen the same fate like usermin and webmin
> happened
> to: It was once removed from the repoi with th ereason "spagehetti code, bad
> code" and then no one ever took a look again to it, although many, m
Hi, Hans
is it your mail setup adding that *SPAM* decoration to the
subject?
Just curious...
cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I only hope, it will not happen the same fate like usermin and webmin happened
to: It was once removed from the repoi with th ereason "spagehetti code, bad
code" and then no one ever took a look again to it, although many, many years
of coding passed by.
And webmin and usermin are still develo
8 matches
Mail list logo
