Re: (should be) simple bind problem [possibly solved]

2015-05-27 Thread Glenn English
On May 27, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Bob Proulx wrote: > Ah! I would not have thought of that one. I didn't consider apparmor either. Saw a mention of it on an Ubuntu site. > Yes. But it isn't enabled by default. I really don't think it is either. But simply renaming that file in the config dir

Re: (should be) simple bind problem [possibly solved]

2015-05-27 Thread Bob Proulx
Glenn English wrote: > apparmor. Ah! I would not have thought of that one. > In the recent Debians (Wheezy++, I think), there is a directory > /etc/apparmor.d. In there is a file called user.sbin.named. That Yes. But it isn't enabled by default. On a recently installed Debian Jessie 8 system:

Re: (should be) simple bind problem [possibly solved]

2015-05-26 Thread Glenn English
apparmor. In the recent Debians (Wheezy++, I think), there is a directory /etc/apparmor.d. In there is a file called user.sbin.named. That file does various things to the /var/cache/bind directory. I didn't look at it long enough to figure out just what it does, and I couldn't find apparmor on