Re: "sudo" command passwd is not canceled.

2012-01-05 Thread Bob Proulx
Joel Rees wrote: > Tom H wrote: > > [I would've have thought that there ought to be a space between > > "(ALL:ALL)" and "NOPASSWD:" but since it worked for the OP before he > > edited polkit files, I guess not.] > > Yeah, since I'm checking, man 5 sudoers, around line 480 on the Fedora > 15 system

Re: "sudo" command passwd is not canceled.

2012-01-05 Thread Joel Rees
Erk. Thanks, Tom. I've got to quit trusting my memory on things that I don't do every day. 2012/1/5 Tom H : > 2012/1/4 Joel Rees : >> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 8:26 PM, chengshid wrote: >>> 于 2012年01月04日 14:45, Bob Proulx 写道: chengshid wrote: >>> rootALL=(ALL:ALL) ALL >> >> Odd that root wo

Re: "sudo" command passwd is not canceled.

2012-01-05 Thread Tom H
2012/1/4 Joel Rees : > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 8:26 PM, chengshid wrote: >> 于 2012年01月04日 14:45, Bob Proulx 写道: >>> chengshid wrote: >> rootALL=(ALL:ALL) ALL > > Odd that root would have to use the password where all the rest don't. But, > ... > >> userALL=(ALL:ALL)NOPASSWD: ALL > > That's

Re: "sudo" command passwd is not canceled.

2012-01-04 Thread Joel Rees
(Woops. I keep forgetting debian-user does the return address right.) On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 8:26 PM, chengshid wrote: > 于 2012年01月04日 14:45, Bob Proulx 写道: > >> chengshid wrote: >>> >>> "sudo" command passwd is not canceled since i modify the follows file

Re: "sudo" command passwd is not canceled.

2012-01-04 Thread chengshid
于 2012年01月04日 14:45, Bob Proulx 写道: chengshid wrote: "sudo" command passwd is not canceled since i modify the follows files. /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/ and /etc/pam.d/ the /etc/sudoers file have modified with no required passwd. help me! thanks. I do not understand what you

Re: "sudo" command passwd is not canceled.

2012-01-04 Thread Balint Szigeti
On 04/01/2012 07:37, chengshid wrote: 于 2012/1/4 14:45, Bob Proulx 写道: chengshid wrote: "sudo" command passwd is not canceled since i modify the follows files. /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/ and /etc/pam.d/ the /etc/sudoers file have modified with no required passwd. help me! tha

Re: "sudo" command passwd is not canceled.

2012-01-03 Thread chengshid
于 2012/1/4 14:45, Bob Proulx 写道: chengshid wrote: "sudo" command passwd is not canceled since i modify the follows files. /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/ and /etc/pam.d/ the /etc/sudoers file have modified with no required passwd. help me! thanks. I do not understand what you are as

Re: "sudo" command passwd is not canceled.

2012-01-03 Thread Bob Proulx
chengshid wrote: > "sudo" command passwd is not canceled since i modify the follows files. > /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/ and /etc/pam.d/ > > the /etc/sudoers file have modified with no required passwd. > > help me! thanks. I do not understand what you are asking

Re: "sudo" command passwd is not canceled.

2012-01-03 Thread chengshid
It is no use to do that, and i also reinstall the sudo, 于 2012年01月04日 13:14, doug 写道: On 01/03/2012 11:49 PM, chengshid wrote: "sudo" command passwd is not canceled since i modify the follows files. /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/ and /etc/pam.d/ the /etc/sudoers file have modifi

Re: "sudo" command passwd is not canceled.

2012-01-03 Thread doug
On 01/03/2012 11:49 PM, chengshid wrote: "sudo" command passwd is not canceled since i modify the follows files. /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/ and /etc/pam.d/ the /etc/sudoers file have modified with no required passwd. help me! thanks. Look in the sudoers file for "nopas

"sudo" command passwd is not canceled.

2012-01-03 Thread chengshid
"sudo" command passwd is not canceled since i modify the follows files. /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/ and /etc/pam.d/ the /etc/sudoers file have modified with no required passwd. help me! thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of &q