Quoting Martin T (m4rtn...@gmail.com):
> On 8/27/15, David Wright wrote:
> > So what depends on python2.6 that won't be satisfied with 2.7?
> >
> > My wheezy shows libdb5.1:i386 5.1.29-5 and jessie has libdb5.3:i386
> > 5.3.28-9
> > (assuming they're related). Neither has python2.6.
> How would
On 8/27/15, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Martin T (m4rtn...@gmail.com):
>> Hi,
>>
>> as far as I know, kept back packages in Debian are shown in case
>> package can not be upgraded with "apt-get upgrade" because upgrade
>> requires to install new packages. Usually this can be fixed with
>> apt-ge
Quoting Martin T (m4rtn...@gmail.com):
> Hi,
>
> as far as I know, kept back packages in Debian are shown in case
> package can not be upgraded with "apt-get upgrade" because upgrade
> requires to install new packages. Usually this can be fixed with
> apt-get dist-upgrade because this will install
Martin T wrote on 08/27/2015 08:08 AM:
>
> Now for some reason "db5.1-util" package is kept back despite the fact
> that I execute "apt-get dist-upgrade":
>
I did an upgrade yesterday, and saw the same thing.
Experience suggests to me that it's a packaging dependency inconsistency
somewhere an
Hi,
as far as I know, kept back packages in Debian are shown in case
package can not be upgraded with "apt-get upgrade" because upgrade
requires to install new packages. Usually this can be fixed with
apt-get dist-upgrade because this will install new packages if needed.
Now for some reason "db5.
5 matches
Mail list logo
