Re: 'testing' & dep conflicts

2000-12-29 Thread Sven Burgener
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 05:44:55PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 12:10:41AM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote: > > 1. Why are packages kept back like follows? [ snip ] > First, since you're upgrading from potato to woody (you've changed > distributions), you should use `apt-get

Re: 'testing' & dep conflicts

2000-12-29 Thread Peter Makholm
Sven Burgener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1. Why are packages kept back like follows? > >$ apt-get update && apt-get upgrade Upgrade will never install new packages. So packages with changed depends-fields will not be upgraded by this command. Read the manual you can read it there.

Re: 'testing' & dep conflicts

2000-12-28 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 12:10:41AM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote: > Hello > > I am running 'testing', upgraded from potato a few days ago. > > Two questions: > > 1. Why are packages kept back like follows? > >$ apt-get update && apt-get upgrade [ snip ] >The following packages have been

'testing' & dep conflicts

2000-12-28 Thread Sven Burgener
Hello I am running 'testing', upgraded from potato a few days ago. Two questions: 1. Why are packages kept back like follows? $ apt-get update && apt-get upgrade Hit http://security.debian.org potato/updates/main Packages Hit http://security.debian.org potato/updates/main Release Hi

'testing' & dep conflicts

2000-12-25 Thread Sven Burgener
Hello I am running 'testing', upgraded from potato a few days ago. Two questions: 1. Why are packages kept back like follows? $ apt-get update && apt-get upgrade Hit http://security.debian.org potato/updates/main Packages Hit http://security.debian.org potato/updates/main Release Hi