On Thu 11 Apr 2019 at 20:55:20 (+0200), Nazar Zhuk wrote:
> On 4/10/19 10:10 PM, David Wright wrote:
> > On Thu 11 Apr 2019 at 00:34:04 (+0200), Nazar Zhuk wrote:
> > > On 4/10/19 10:58 AM, David Wright wrote:
> > > > On Sat 06 Apr 2019 at 08:42:31 (+0100), Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > > > > On Fri,
On 4/10/19 10:10 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 11 Apr 2019 at 00:34:04 (+0200), Nazar Zhuk wrote:
On 4/10/19 10:58 AM, David Wright wrote:
On Sat 06 Apr 2019 at 08:42:31 (+0100), Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 09:39:23PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
Given a straight toss-up
On Wed 10 Apr 2019 at 19:41:44 (-0400), Lee wrote:
> On 4/10/19, Nazar Zhuk wrote:
> > On 4/10/19 10:58 AM, David Wright wrote:
> >> On Sat 06 Apr 2019 at 08:42:31 (+0100), Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 09:39:23PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> >
> Given a straight toss-u
On Thu 11 Apr 2019 at 00:34:04 (+0200), Nazar Zhuk wrote:
> On 4/10/19 10:58 AM, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sat 06 Apr 2019 at 08:42:31 (+0100), Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 09:39:23PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
>
> > > > Given a straight toss-up though, I think synaptic h
On 4/10/19, Nazar Zhuk wrote:
> On 4/10/19 10:58 AM, David Wright wrote:
>> On Sat 06 Apr 2019 at 08:42:31 (+0100), Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 09:39:23PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
>
Given a straight toss-up though, I think synaptic has to give way
because
th
On 4/10/19 10:58 AM, David Wright wrote:
On Sat 06 Apr 2019 at 08:42:31 (+0100), Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 09:39:23PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
Given a straight toss-up though, I think synaptic has to give way because
there are plenty of alternatives. I'd never heard of
On Sat 06 Apr 2019 at 08:42:31 (+0100), Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 09:39:23PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > "Why not make a [Conflicts:] with Wayland / Gnome? It's not
> >possible to make sure that synaptic installs on a [Conflicts:]
> >that would remove Wayland?"
On Sat 06 Apr 2019 at 09:26:51 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 05 April 2019 23:06:13 David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 05 Apr 2019 at 14:21:21 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > On Friday 05 April 2019 11:05:00 Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > Indeed, and running the U
On Sat 06 Apr 2019 at 09:00:14 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 05 April 2019 22:39:23 David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 05 Apr 2019 at 17:01:33 (-0400), Lee wrote:
> > > On 4/5/19, Reco wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 04:01:50PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > > >> On Thu, Apr 04,
On Sat 06 Apr 2019 at 11:35:08 (+0100), Dominic Knight wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-04-06 at 19:56 +1100, David wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 at 19:08, Curt wrote:
> > > My impression from my general reading here is quite a few people
> > > rely on
> > > the synaptic package manager. I use apt-get; it's
On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 07:56:22PM +1100, David wrote:
> I have seen this in IRC. People join there to ask questions
> about Gnome for example, but no-one providing support in the
> channel is actually using Gnome themselves, because they prefer more
> sophisticatedenvironments, even though it's th
On 4/4/19 10:15 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
I frankly don't care if it needs users. To get users, it has to work. If
it doesn't work at least as well as synaptic, it will never get the
users. If thats not plain enough to the people making these descisions,
tuff luck. This stuff gets its users by wo
On Friday 05 April 2019 23:06:13 David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 05 Apr 2019 at 14:21:21 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Friday 05 April 2019 11:05:00 Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Indeed, and running the UI toolkit code as root was always
> > > considered a bad design pattern,
On Friday 05 April 2019 22:39:23 David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 05 Apr 2019 at 17:01:33 (-0400), Lee wrote:
> > On 4/5/19, Reco wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 04:01:50PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 12:56:49PM -, Curt wrote:
> > >> > My understanding is th
On 2019-04-06, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> If synaptic, as somebody else has mentioned, helps with more complicated
> upgrades (where maybe lots of packages have to be removed and then (I hope)
> reinstalled, I might give synaptic a try.
So as far as GUI package managers go in Debian, there's
On Fri, 2019-04-05 at 15:30 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 05 Apr 2019 at 21:34:15 (+0200), Jan Claeys wrote:
> > Another well-known one is GParted, which doesn't really have an
> > alternative for people to use instead...
>
> Does parted not do the same things?
No, it can do some things GPa
On Fri, 2019-04-05 at 17:01 -0400, Lee wrote:
> That's what I don't understand. Why remove the package if it's only
> a problem with some desktops?
In fact, it's not even a problem on Gnome + Wayland, as you should be
able to run Synaptic as root with XWayland and the “right” xhost
setting (requi
On Saturday, April 06, 2019 04:56:22 AM David wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 at 19:08, Curt wrote:
> Newbie asks "how do I do X in Gnome" ... and no-one there knows the answer
> :) This might be less of an issue in other distros than it is in Debian.
>
> > Thing is, beyond its innate and fundamental
On Sat, 2019-04-06 at 19:56 +1100, David wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 at 19:08, Curt wrote:
> > My impression from my general reading here is quite a few people
> > rely on
> > the synaptic package manager. I use apt-get; it's pie-like
> > simplicity
> > comforts me.
>
> Speaking in very broad term
On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 at 19:08, Curt wrote:
>
> My impression from my general reading here is quite a few people rely on
> the synaptic package manager. I use apt-get; it's pie-like simplicity
> comforts me.
Speaking in very broad terms to make a general and somewhat
obvious point, we could say that
On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 08:07:41 - (UTC)
Curt wrote:
> On 2019-04-05, Lee wrote:
> >
> > Can't [whatever installs the software] notice that Gnome is
> > installed/selected & not install synaptic? Or patch synaptic to
> > realize it's running under Gnome & spit out an error message and
> > quit?
On 2019-04-05, Lee wrote:
>
> Can't [whatever installs the software] notice that Gnome is
> installed/selected & not install synaptic? Or patch synaptic to
> realize it's running under Gnome & spit out an error message and quit?
>
> Everybody pays the price because it doesn't work with Gnome seem
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 09:39:23PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
"Why not make a [Conflicts:] with Wayland / Gnome? It's not
possible to make sure that synaptic installs on a [Conflicts:]
that would remove Wayland?"
This is probably the easiest option to support as it should be
possible to
On Fri 05 Apr 2019 at 14:21:21 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 05 April 2019 11:05:00 Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Indeed, and running the UI toolkit code as root was always considered
> > a bad design pattern, even whilst it works under X.
>
> But thats no longer possible wi
On Fri 05 Apr 2019 at 17:01:33 (-0400), Lee wrote:
> On 4/5/19, Reco wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 04:01:50PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 12:56:49PM -, Curt wrote:
> >> > My understanding is the problem lies in the Gnome/Wayland combo (which
> >> > is the d
On 2019-04-05 21:13, David Wright wrote:
From this and other posts of yours, you seem to feel very vulnerable
when connected to anywhere outside your system, as if you're under
a man-in-the-middle attack all the time.
Do I come across like that ?
It is probably correct. I think it is because I
On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 at 09:35, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>
> I just found this Ubuntu announcement from January. 17.10 had picked up
> wayland. But 18.04 dropped back to X.org due to stability and app
> compatibility issues:
> https://www.neowin.net/news/ubuntu-1804-will-revert-to-long-in-the-tooth
On 04/05/2019 03:34 PM, Jan Claeys wrote:
On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 16:22 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
How many graphical programs does Debian actually have that are
intended to be run as root on a desktop? It's certainly not "half
the os's utilities". I'd be surprised if there are as many as ten
I just found this Ubuntu announcement from January. 17.03 had picked up
wayland. But 18.04 dropped back to X.org.
https://www.neowin.net/news/ubuntu-1804-will-revert-to-long-in-the-tooth-xorg
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, 4:01 PM Lee wrote:
> On 4/5/19, Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 05,
Received from Gene on Fri, 5 Apr 2019 13:42:57 -0400 Re:
'synaptic' removed from buster
> We all tend to forget these guys like to eat and pay the rent, so
> most have a $dayjob unless a student with an arm long enough to reach
> Daddy's wallet. An
I just found this Ubuntu announcement from January. 17.10 had picked up
wayland. But 18.04 dropped back to X.org due to stability and app
compatibility issues:
https://www.neowin.net/news/ubuntu-1804-will-revert-to-long-in-the-tooth-xorg
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, 4:01 PM Lee wrote:
> On 4/5/19, Reco
On 4/5/19, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 04:01:50PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 12:56:49PM -, Curt wrote:
>> > My understanding is the problem lies in the Gnome/Wayland combo (which
>> > is the default combo starting with Buster).
>>
>> The p
On Friday 05 April 2019 15:34:15 Jan Claeys wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 16:22 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > How many graphical programs does Debian actually have that are
> > intended to be run as root on a desktop? It's certainly not "half
> > the os's utilities". I'd be surprised if there
On Fri 05 Apr 2019 at 21:34:15 (+0200), Jan Claeys wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 16:22 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > How many graphical programs does Debian actually have that are
> > intended to be run as root on a desktop? It's certainly not "half
> > the os's utilities". I'd be surprised if
On Fri 05 Apr 2019 at 11:07:42 (+0100), mick crane wrote:
> On 2019-04-05 10:51, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 08:43:32AM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> > > On 2019-04-05 07:46, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > >On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 07:37:05AM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> > > >
> >
On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 16:22 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> How many graphical programs does Debian actually have that are
> intended to be run as root on a desktop? It's certainly not "half
> the os's utilities". I'd be surprised if there are as many as ten.
Another well-known one is GParted, whi
On 04/05/2019 01:36 PM, Andy Smith wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 07:44:32AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
I installed Buster *only* because an application I'm investigating requires
the version of Python in Buster.
Another option may be to use "virtualenv" or a similar trick to run
jus
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 07:44:32AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I installed Buster *only* because an application I'm investigating requires
> the version of Python in Buster.
Another option may be to use "virtualenv" or a similar trick to run
just the upstream Python and required modules
On Friday 05 April 2019 11:05:00 Jonathan Dowland wrote:
[...]
> Indeed, and running the UI toolkit code as root was always considered
> a bad design pattern, even whilst it works under X.
But thats no longer possible with X, root cannot use the users display.
And for me, the only user on this
On Friday 05 April 2019 09:03:40 Francisco M Neto wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 14:46 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > To add to what Curt and Reco have said: Running Synaptic using a
> > Wayland/Gnome combo,by clicking on an icon, it doesn't start. Not
> > very helpful, I think you
Hi.
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 04:01:50PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 12:56:49PM -, Curt wrote:
> > My understanding is the problem lies in the Gnome/Wayland combo (which
> > is the default combo starting with Buster).
>
> The problem there, IMHO, is Wayland
On Sat, 2019-04-06 at 00:29 +1100, David wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 at 00:25, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> > Have a good day, gentlemen.
>
> Why are the good wishes to gentlemen only?
Proverbial gentlemen. Ladies and other gender denominations are,
naturally, all included <3
Francisco
s
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 04:22:43PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
How many graphical programs does Debian actually have that are intended
to be run as root on a desktop? It's certainly not "half the os's
utilities". I'd be surprised if there are as many as ten.
Indeed, and running the UI toolkit
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 04:15:32PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
I didn't intend to say it was simple. Its also incorrect. Fix one or the
other, but I don't expect it to be "simple". You fix wayland once, or
you fix half the os's utilities.
The "fix" you describe for Wayland would be to remove th
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 12:56:49PM -, Curt wrote:
My understanding is the problem lies in the Gnome/Wayland combo (which
is the default combo starting with Buster).
The problem there, IMHO, is Wayland being the default desktop choice.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jm
On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 at 00:25, Francisco M Neto wrote:
>
> Have a good day, gentlemen.
Why are the good wishes to gentlemen only?
Greetings!
On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 14:46 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> To add to what Curt and Reco have said: Running Synaptic using a
> Wayland/Gnome combo,by clicking on an icon, it doesn't start. Not very
> helpful, I think you'll agree. Especially for software that's aimed
> squarely at GUI use
On 04/04/2019 07:20 AM, Curt wrote:
On 2019-04-04, David wrote:
People accustomed to using synaptic might want to begin considering
alternative tools, because synaptic has been removed from buster.
More info:
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1037065/synaptic-removed-from-testing/
https://tracke
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 12:46:28PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2019-04-05 12:37, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 12:28:18PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
[...]
> well su root and then enter root's password always seemed to work.
Yes, of course. I was arguing with the "normal user
On 2019-04-05 12:37, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 12:28:18PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
[...]
probably I don't understand. What I'm mooting is who knows what
skillful cracker can get hold of your account credentials when
online. If user can't do root stuff on strength of their
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 12:28:18PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
[...]
> probably I don't understand. What I'm mooting is who knows what
> skillful cracker can get hold of your account credentials when
> online. If user can't do root stuff on strength of their own
> password then any malignant activit
On 2019-04-05 11:27, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 11:07:42AM +0100, mick crane wrote:
[...]
well normal user isn't supposed to do system things. Sudo makes me
nervous.
You don't seem to understand sudo.
It lets you control finely under which conditions a normal user
is ab
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 11:07:42AM +0100, mick crane wrote:
[...]
> well normal user isn't supposed to do system things. Sudo makes me
> nervous.
You don't seem to understand sudo.
It lets you control finely under which conditions a normal user
is able to change to root. One posibility (one edi
On 2019-04-05 10:51, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 08:43:32AM +0100, mick crane wrote:
On 2019-04-05 07:46, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 07:37:05AM +0100, mick crane wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>Making you be root to download stuff off the internet never seemed
>>lik
On 2019-04-05 10:06, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 05 April 2019 02:37:05 mick crane wrote:
On 2019-04-04 20:57, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 03:46:52PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> The solution seems simple enough, fix wayland. This is after all a
>> multiuser and multitask
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 08:43:32AM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2019-04-05 07:46, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 07:37:05AM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >>Making you be root to download stuff off the internet never seemed
> >>like a good idea.
> >
> >And letting
On Friday 05 April 2019 02:37:05 mick crane wrote:
> On 2019-04-04 20:57, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 03:46:52PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> The solution seems simple enough, fix wayland. This is after all a
> >> multiuser and multitasking OS, why go out of the way, way o
On 2019-04-05 07:46, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 07:37:05AM +0100, mick crane wrote:
[...]
Making you be root to download stuff off the internet never seemed
like a good idea.
And letting "you" (not root) install things in system directories
(/usr/bin et al) seems to be a
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 07:37:05AM +0100, mick crane wrote:
[...]
> Making you be root to download stuff off the internet never seemed
> like a good idea.
And letting "you" (not root) install things in system directories
(/usr/bin et al) seems to be as bad an idea. Remember that little
javascrip
On 2019-04-04 20:57, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 03:46:52PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
The solution seems simple enough, fix wayland. This is after all a
multiuser and multitasking OS, why go out of the way, way out of the
way
to make it work like win-3.0?
The notion of run
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 04:15:32PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I didn't intend to say it was simple. Its also incorrect. Fix one or the
> other, but I don't expect it to be "simple". You fix wayland once, or
> you fix half the os's utilities.
Wayland isn't in need of a "fix", as I understand i
On Thursday 04 April 2019 15:57:17 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 03:46:52PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > The solution seems simple enough, fix wayland. This is after all a
> > multiuser and multitasking OS, why go out of the way, way out of the
> > way to make it work like win-
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 03:46:52PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> The solution seems simple enough, fix wayland. This is after all a
> multiuser and multitasking OS, why go out of the way, way out of the way
> to make it work like win-3.0?
The notion of running a client as user X to talk to a dis
On Thursday 04 April 2019 13:45:52 Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 06:36:32PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 16:02:13 +0300
> >
> > Reco wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 09:20:51AM -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 12:33 +0100, Brad Rog
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 06:58:20PM +0300, Reco wrote:
[...]
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 10:15:40AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
[...]
> > If thats not plain enough to the people making these descisions, tuff
> > luck. This stuff gets its users by working, and gnome has not
> > recently demonstrated
Hi.
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 06:36:32PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 16:02:13 +0300
> Reco wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 09:20:51AM -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 12:33 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > > > If it is not, there is nothing preventi
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 16:02:13 +0300
Reco wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 09:20:51AM -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 12:33 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > > If it is not, there is nothing preventing it's return to
> > > repositories
> > > > some time after. It happened wi
Hi.
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 10:15:40AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 04 April 2019 09:02:13 Reco wrote:
> > The *unofficial* one is the existence of "gnome-packagekit". The thing
> > needs users, and this is one of the ways of getting them.
>
> I frankly don't care if it needs
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 23:21, Curt wrote:
> On 2019-04-04, David wrote:
> > People accustomed to using synaptic might want to begin considering
> > alternative tools, because synaptic has been removed from buster.
> Owlett's gonna be pissed.
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 00:26, Richard Owlett wrote:
On Thursday 04 April 2019 09:02:13 Reco wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 09:20:51AM -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 12:33 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > > If it is not, there is nothing preventing it's return to
> > > repositories
> > >
> > > > some time after. It happened
On Thu, 04 Apr 2019 09:20:51 -0300
Francisco M Neto wrote:
Hello Francisco,
> What is the problem between Synaptic and Gnome? I've been using
To add to what Curt and Reco have said: Running Synaptic using a
Wayland/Gnome combo,by clicking on an icon, it doesn't start. Not very
helpful,
On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 09:20:51AM -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 12:33 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > If it is not, there is nothing preventing it's return to repositories
> > > some time after. It happened with other useful and popular packages
> > > before.
> >
> > Indeed
On Thursday 04 April 2019 07:33:13 Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 15:58:33 +0500
> "Alexander V. Makartsev" wrote:
>
> Hello Alexander,
>
> >Considering the date, it must be an April Fool's joke.
>
> It's not.
>
> >If it is not, there is nothing preventing it's return to repositories
> >
On 2019-04-04, Francisco M Neto wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 12:33 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
>> If it is not, there is nothing preventing it's return to repositories
>> > some time after. It happened with other useful and popular packages
>> > before.
>>=20
>> Indeed. Reading the bug report
On Thursday 04 April 2019 06:52:35 David wrote:
> People accustomed to using synaptic might want to begin considering
> alternative tools, because synaptic has been removed from buster.
>
> More info:
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/1037065/synaptic-removed-from-testing/
> https://tracker.debian
On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 12:33 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> If it is not, there is nothing preventing it's return to repositories
> > some time after. It happened with other useful and popular packages
> > before.
>
> Indeed. Reading the bug report demonstrates that ppl are keen for it to
> be re-ins
On 2019-04-04, David wrote:
> People accustomed to using synaptic might want to begin considering
> alternative tools, because synaptic has been removed from buster.
>
> More info:
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/1037065/synaptic-removed-from-testing/
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/synaptic
>
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 15:58:33 +0500
"Alexander V. Makartsev" wrote:
Hello Alexander,
>Considering the date, it must be an April Fool's joke.
It's not.
>If it is not, there is nothing preventing it's return to repositories
>some time after. It happened with other useful and popular packages
>befo
On 04.04.2019 15:52, David wrote:
> People accustomed to using synaptic might want to begin considering
> alternative tools, because synaptic has been removed from buster.
>
> More info:
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/1037065/synaptic-removed-from-testing/
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/synapt
People accustomed to using synaptic might want to begin considering
alternative tools, because synaptic has been removed from buster.
More info:
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1037065/synaptic-removed-from-testing/
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/synaptic
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.
80 matches
Mail list logo
