Re: 'mktemp' testing package dependency

2009-06-17 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-06-17 15:23 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 07:47:20AM +0200, Sven Joachim was > heard to say: >> On 2009-06-17 05:59 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:59:03PM +0200, Sven Joachim >> > was heard to say: >> >> On 2009-06-16 21:44 +02

Re: 'mktemp' testing package dependency

2009-06-17 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 07:47:20AM +0200, Sven Joachim was heard to say: > On 2009-06-17 05:59 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:59:03PM +0200, Sven Joachim > > was heard to say: > >> On 2009-06-16 21:44 +0200, Jason Filippou wrote: > >> > Downgrade the following pa

Re: 'mktemp' testing package dependency

2009-06-16 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-06-17 05:59 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:59:03PM +0200, Sven Joachim was > heard to say: >> On 2009-06-16 21:44 +0200, Jason Filippou wrote: >> > Downgrade the following packages: >> > mktemp [1.6-4 (now) -> 1.5-9 (stable)] >> > >> > Score is 80 >> >> I wond

Re: 'mktemp' testing package dependency

2009-06-16 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:59:03PM +0200, Sven Joachim was heard to say: > On 2009-06-16 21:44 +0200, Jason Filippou wrote: > > Downgrade the following packages: > > mktemp [1.6-4 (now) -> 1.5-9 (stable)] > > > > Score is 80 > > I wonder why aptitude is suggesting this, downgrading mktemp would

Re: 'mktemp' testing package dependency

2009-06-16 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-06-16 21:44 +0200, Jason Filippou wrote: > Over the last few days aptitude in my testing system detects an > unsolved package dependency, concerning the package 'mktemp'. Here's > the output of full-upgrade: > > ja...@debian:~$ sudo aptitude full-upgrade > Reading package lists... Done > B

Re: 'mktemp' testing package dependency

2009-06-16 Thread Brad Rogers
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:44:21 +0300 Jason Filippou wrote: Hello Jason, > Or just any information regarding mktemp? Using Synpatic, mktemp is marked as local/obsolete. This is in testing, of course. Marking mktemp for removal warns me that doing so might make my system unusable. I therefore de

'mktemp' testing package dependency

2009-06-16 Thread Jason Filippou
Hello, Over the last few days aptitude in my testing system detects an unsolved package dependency, concerning the package 'mktemp'. Here's the output of full-upgrade: ja...@debian:~$ sudo aptitude full-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Do