--- Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:21:12 +0200
> Nigel Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is a bit sad. Christian has trashed all the
> available
> > multimedia packages for Sarge since Etch has gone
> stable.
Christian,
Since Sarge will be supported by d
I have a sarge machine that I have set up to rip CDs
wtih the packages from the Debian multimedia archive.
When I run apt-get update, I get the following:
apt-get update
Hit http://mirrors.kernel.org sarge/main Packages
Hit http://mirrors.kernel.org sarge/main Release
Hit http://mirrors.kernel.or
--- Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:55:57 -0700, zfh wrote in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> ..are you referring to the passengers onboard flight
> UA93 on 9/11???
> On "Let's roll!" these civilians _became_ lawful
> comba
--- Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:33:28 -0700, zfh wrote in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>
> > Sorry to break into your offtopic rants, but I
> can't resist this one.
> > Under the Geneva Conventions, enemy combatants
>
> >> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 04:20:04PM -0400,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Since some of the al-Qaeda and taliban
prisoner's were in fact
> >> >> denied their GC protections, by being
> tortured, mistreated, etc.,
> >> >> it's pretty obvious that the "QCs don't apply"
> provisi
--- Johannes Wiedersich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 10:43:30PM -0400, Jim
> Hyslop wrote:
> >> If I had immediately followed with some
> outrageous claim that Windows is
> >> better and has fewer security holes because
> ,
> >> *THEN* you cou
6 matches
Mail list logo
