Hello again,
I found the solution,its not the 'nice' directive but the 'priority'
which does the trick.
I misunderstood the man page in this case.
Bye,
udo.
On 23.07.2007, at 20:59, udo waechter wrote:
Hey all,
we want to make all programs from remote users run by a nic
Hey all,
we want to make all programs from remote users run by a nice value.
I have made pam_limits have its own configuration file for /etc/pam.d/
ssh, where everybody is assigned a nice value of 10 (for both hard
and soft)
I am not sure if this actually works, since top still shows a nice
v
We are using puppet from www.reductivelabs.com which defines a
declarative language where you tell what should be done on a certain
computer or on a cluster.
We have about 10 servers (fileserver, database, web, computing,...),
and about 30+ desktop machines where we try to provide a consisten
On 26.09.2006, at 11:21, George Borisov wrote:
udo waechter wrote:
If only one Interface is up (no matter which one) I can not only
reach
the IP adress of that interface but also the other IP Adress which is
not assigned to any computer in the subnet. It also works vice-versa.
When both
Hello George,
On 25.09.2006, at 18:29, George Borisov wrote:
udo waechter wrote:
As long as I ifup one of the two interfaces everything is fine. Not
everything though, since both IP Adresses are reachable. there is no
other computer having one of the two IPs, since none of them are
reachable
Hello list,
I have a strange problem with a machine which has 2 Intel G-Bit
interfaces. The driver is e1000, kernel 2.6.17-2-686 (SMP).
Each interface is supposed to be available via a different IP-Adress.
Both MAC-Adresses are known to and working with dhcp.
As long as I ifup one of the two
6 matches
Mail list logo
