On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 09:47:07PM +0200, Stefan Waidele jun. wrote:
> Howell Evans wrote:
> >You can not make cron more granuler(sp?) then ever 5 mins.
>
> Quote from 'man cron':
> "cron then wakes up every minute, examining all stored crontabs, check-
> ing each command to see if it shoul
Does http://snapshot.debian.net really keep EVERY version of EVERY package in
unstable?
I've been doing this myself; on the rare instances when something blows up
it's been great; but if anything is missing, Murphy's law comes into play...
-Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 09:18:51PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 04:05:39PM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 01:40:27AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > Wow, way too easy. It should require you to type something long and
> > > case sensitive. You know, somet
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 02:43:01PM -0700, Dave Carrigan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 01:39:03PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Sometimes, when I type SU and then start typing my password really fast,
> > a few of the keystrokes will be echod to the screen -- usually when the
> > syste
Sometimes, when I type SU and then start typing my password really fast,
a few of the keystrokes will be echod to the screen -- usually when the
system is only under moderate load and I'm not "expecting" it to be
slow. It happens in X with gnome-terminal and also sometimes just at
the console.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 10:25:18PM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running unstable and apt-getted openoffice.org a couple of days
> ago. The fonts in openoffice are awful - both the actual application and
> fonts used when writing documents. My gnome desktop has really nice
> anti
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:55:39PM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote:
> On Tuesday September 23 at 06:37pm
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > You can stop flaming me now.
>
> I'm not flaming anyone, I'm trying to fix the signal/noise ratio by
> directing your question to the proper place. I'm sorry I didn
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:19:54PM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote:
> On Tuesday September 23 at 06:13pm
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I don't think I clearly stated my question:
> >
> > Why is Debian packaging 3.0.4 when 3.0.6 has been out for a long time?
> >
> > Purely a Debian question...
>
>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 06:13:28PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 06:35:21PM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote:
> > On Tuesday September 23 at 03:09pm
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > The latest stable release of Motion (http://motion.sf.net) is 3.0.6.
> > > The packaged
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 06:35:21PM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote:
> On Tuesday September 23 at 03:09pm
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > The latest stable release of Motion (http://motion.sf.net) is 3.0.6.
> > The packaged version in unstable is 3.0.4. I compiled 3.0.6 manually,
> >
> > necessary to
The latest stable release of Motion (http://motion.sf.net) is 3.0.6.
The packaged version in unstable is 3.0.4. I compiled 3.0.6 manually,
necessary to work with the latest ov511 drivers.
I filed a wish about it; most of the bugs are >1 or 2 years old (most
are marked as Fixed in NMU).
What's
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:55:47PM -0400, Alfredo Valles wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Seems to me that for the first time debian is going to have real competition
> in its own field.
> Red Hat announced that they will join with fedora community and produce the
> Red Hat Linux Project. So they will have
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:53:36AM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:16:51 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:06:49AM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> > > On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:45:42 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >
> > > > if I fork bplay several ti
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:06:49AM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:45:42 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > if I fork bplay several times, it doesn't "mix" the sounds: they
> > still play out synchronously, even though the caller isn't blocked.
> >
> > Is there a sound ut
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:22:28AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > so unless anybody has a better already written sound buffer mixer to
> > recommend, consider this matter closed.
> >
> > Thanks for your attention.
> > -T
> >
> I had a
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 07:45:42PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:15:40PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> > There's probably an easier way than this, but you could use perl to fork()
> > the bplay processes, so they don't block.
> >
>
> Okay, I realized I could just ca
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:15:40PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> There's probably an easier way than this, but you could use perl to fork()
> the bplay processes, so they don't block.
>
Okay, I realized I could just call a bash script that ends in & to play
the sounds async to procmail, that's h
I'm a procmail newb. I've written a recipie to play a WAV when a
message arrives. It works, it sounds nice, but it's synchronous:
:0 c
* ^X-Mailing-List:.*lists.debian.org*
| /usr/bin/bplay /x/x/click_x.wav
Since this WAV takes ~1 sec to play, procmail blocks 1 sec per message.
It ends up ta
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 09:10:14PM -0400, Gerard Ceraso wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: AnotherLinuxGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 7:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Divx and DVD playback
>
>
> what is the best of the best when it comes to a
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 02:25:56PM -0400, Geordie Birch wrote:
> Cheryl Homiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [21 Sep 2003 12:09 -0500]:
> > Is there any clean way to get rid of gnome. When I did
> > "apt-get install gnome)
> > it installed a whole bunch of packages.
> > but when I did
> > apt-get remove gnom
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 12:27:52AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The docs aren't very prescriptive and the new versign-blocker isn't
> > documented at all, so here's what I did.
> >
> > 1. If you're running Woody or Sid, you'll have dhcp-client. DnsMasq recommends
> > res
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 11:20:03AM -0400, Jeff Elkins wrote:
> On Saturday 20 September 2003 2:00 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> Why not try: "dvd+rw-tools" (debian packaged, reportedly has
> >> better support for +RW than even cdrecord-prodvd)?
> >
> >I use cdrecord-prodvd.
> >It's definitel
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 08:44:56AM +0800, csj wrote:
> At Fri, 19 Sep 2003 16:58:37 -0400,
> Jeff Elkins wrote:
> >
> > OK, I'm bummed.
>
> [...]
>
> > DVD-RW (don't have any DVD-R's) seems to work fine under
> > linux. However, DVD +RW/DVD+R discs produce a coaster every
> > time. However, both
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 07:57:45PM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:40:01PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The other day I wished for a patched DnsMasq to block Verisign.
> > Pleased to say it works!
>
> > 3. Then I patched /etc/dnsmasq.conf:
> > --- dnsmasq.conf.orig 2
The other day I wished for a patched DnsMasq to block Verisign.
Pleased to say it works!
The docs aren't very prescriptive and the new versign-blocker isn't
documented at all, so here's what I did.
1. If you're running Woody or Sid, you'll have dhcp-client. DnsMasq recommends
resolvconf, and dhc
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:42:35PM -0600, Jacob Anawalt wrote:
> tvn said:
> > On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:15:08 +0700
> > Oki DZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Have you stumbled upon the text fields that wouldn't accept any input?
> >> (ie: no keystroke accepted, but the mouse works).
> >> It happens
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 09:48:58PM -0400, Nicolas wrote:
> Is there a equation system resolver in debian or linux in general?
> Basicly, I need to resolv equation systems or simplify very long and
> complicated equations.
>
> Nic Cola
> --
> QOTD:
> Sacred cows make great hamburgers.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 11:30:28AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> To follow up on this, thanks to the quick work of Lamont Jones, Debian
> unstable will, in about 15 minutes, include a bind patched as follows:
> [snip]
I haven't been running a local DNS, I get my IP & DNS settings from DNS
from my ISP.
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 02:11:03PM -0400, Mental Patient wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:39:01AM -0400, Mental Patient wrote:
> >
> >Is the framebuffer accelerated with a Radeon [9700]? I got it to work
> >but it was very slow compared to not using it. This would m
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:39:01AM -0400, Mental Patient wrote:
> Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> >On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 00:31:55 -0400,
> >Mental Patient <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> >>Anyone using this setup? I recently switched my Geforce3 for a Radeon.
> >>I have
30 matches
Mail list logo
