On 11 Lip, 09:30, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello supermega,
>
> do you also have a real name?
>
> On 2008-07-11 03:59 +0200, supermega wrote:
>
> > I'd like to use start-stop-daemon with chroot option, but I get a
> > strange error. A test:
Hi,
I'd like to use start-stop-daemon with chroot option, but I get a
strange error. A test:
# start-stop-daemon --start --chroot /bin --exec ls
start-stop-daemon: Unable to start ls: No such file or directory (No
such file or directory)
I should work, shouldn't it?
When I run this:
# start-stop-
On 11 Sie, 09:50, Mathias Brodala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Use an editor which allows you to omit the BOM, it's optional for UTF-8
> anyways.
> As long as you send the correct Content-Type header, the output won't be any
> different.
>
I know this solition and I use it for now, but it's again
Hi,
my system is Debian stable Etch with:
- apache22.2.3-4
- libapache2-mod-php55.2.0-8+etch7
PHP interpreter does not parse UTF BOM header bytes in UTF-
encoded .php files and so I get a well known warning "Cannot modify
header information - headers already sent" when trying to use heade
It's a mistake, I modified it manualy... should be:
32764: from all fwmark 0x5 lookup isp2
32765: from lookup isp2
32766: from all lookup main
32767: from all lookup default
But if there were no mark why would it affect the routing?
I've logged the packets on FORWARD:
iptables -A FORWARD -s $
of course:
# ip rule
0: from all lookup local
32765: from all fwmark 0x5 lookup isp2
32766: from all lookup main
32767: from all lookup default
Packets from are dropped.
If the ip rule looked like that:
0: from all lookup local
32765: from all fwmark 0x5 lookup isp2
32765: from lo
well... it doesn't.
I tested it once more with sarge/stable and 2.4 kernel.
Funny thing:
when the "ip rule fwmark" is added then the next rule - with lower
preference - is checked, too (it can be main or "ip rule from" or
anything).
If the routes set by these 2 rules are the same then packet is
a
I don't think I need more complicated script.. I understand iproute2
and routing in linux quite well.. and this should work.
My question was rather if I need to make any more OS tweaking (maybe in
/proc/sys/net/ipv4 or whatever). Or if there is something blocking
fwmark installed by default.
--
Thank you both.
Nelson Castillo, can you tell me what kernel you're using?
So..
- I download sarge/stable, install minimal system
- apt-get iproute
- do the following commands:
#adding new routing table
echo "200 isp2" >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables
# setting up routing
Thanks for your answer.
But way the first packet only?
All packets from are marked and all should go to table isp2.
Even with per-port load balancing in most services dest. port is always
the same and I don't have to use conntrack/connmark (in Slackware).
--
Tomek
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
hello,
I tried to post the topic on many groups.. with no answer.
I would like to use "ip rule add fwmark" and I think it's just not
working in debian.
system
debian testing from 2005-10-07
kernel 2.6.12-1-386
iproute2 from apt-get, ss041019
iptables from apt-get, 1.3.3
problem
I have
11 matches
Mail list logo
