Re: join us!

2000-08-31 Thread Kurt Seifried
> OK, 2 to 5 minutes downtime to disable. Big Whoop. Maybe should be > done. But, have you ever tried to administer 200 computers? How many > people know the BIOS password? Do the primary users know it? Can they > reboot their own machine? Does an administrator have to visit every > machine

Re: join us!

2000-08-31 Thread Kurt Seifried
n using sulogin and not securing Lilo is like putting a nice expensive dead bolt lock on a screen door. Kurt Seifried SecurityPortal, your focal point for security on the net http://www.securityportal.com/

Re: join us!

2000-08-31 Thread Kurt Seifried
> Personally, when I see "1.2.0pre10-4", I think, "This is not the same as the > original/base 1.2.0pre10." Depending on how the numbering is implemented, it > has been updated 3 or 4 times since the original 1.2.0pre10. So I would not > expect it to have the same bugs. So did you fix the root h

Re: join us!

2000-08-31 Thread Kurt Seifried
> Yes I read the update. I'd be happy to review your articles for you, but I > don't think you should stop at one reviewer. Debian is a very big project and I'm > still finding my way around parts of it. You may have been in contact with Ben > Collins. If so I suggest you ask him too. Yeah, he did

Re: [linux-security] Re: Chrooting bind 8.1.2 under debian 2.0

1998-07-17 Thread seifried
ds to bind port 53 >which is below 1024 there are problem to execute it. One solution is to >rewrite named code (like httpd) another is to make the hole into the >kernel. Both are nonstandard solutions. There are also possible to use >some portwrapper/redir. Does anyone use some of these? > >[mod: Patches are floating around. -- REW] >--- >Cougar -seifried -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null