Re: Request for window manager recommendations

2005-06-13 Thread Rogério Brito
On Jun 12 2005, Steve Lamb wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > A personal recommendation of your favourite window manager would be > > much appreciated. > > I'd say give XFCE4 a try. While I generally use KDE it wasn't > practical on my laptop w/only 192Mb of RAM. But neither XFCE nor KDE

Re: Request for window manager recommendations

2005-06-12 Thread Rogério Brito
On 06/12/05 22:42, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote: openbox -- it's very small, fast and configurable. Hi, J. I benchmarked the memory usage of openbox (which I installed given your suggestion here some time ago) and I didn't see any difference between it and fluxbox with the "Minimal" style. Pe

On the use of deborphan (was: Re: woody->sarge failed: out pf disk space)

2005-06-12 Thread Rogério Brito
On 06/12/05 22:43, Tom Allison wrote: A thousand pardons. It found version 10 that was replaced by version 11. I was looking at version 11 being in use, not 10. You're right, I'm wrong. Sorry for the waste in bandwidth. No problems. BTW, here is the command that I use with deborphan: apt-get

Re: Request for window manager recommendations

2005-06-12 Thread Rogério Brito
On Jun 12 2005, Ishwar Rattan wrote: > 2. fluxbox I also recommend fluxbox, especially when used with the "Minimal" style. It is quite functional and lightweight. I measured its memory consumption and that of openbox (which was claimed to be faster and lighter) and I could not find any difference

watchdog

2001-10-09 Thread rogério
o módulo do kernel2.4.9-k6 carregado no boot é o tulip e após um pequeno tempo de uso aparece o seguinte informe: METDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit time out isto só tem ocorrido porqeu ao fazer uma atualização para o kernel 2.4.9-k6 do kernel.2.2.18 não consegui que o módulo ne2k-pci seja ca