On 12/18/21 7:08 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 09:20:59PM -0800, David Newman wrote:
Thanks for this. I get similar results where doas shows root's PATH -- but I
cannot execute a file called '/usr/local/sbin/s', which is owned by
root:root and has 0750 permis
On Dec 18, 2021, at 12:44, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>
>
>>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021, 3:56 AM Andrei POPESCU
>>> wrote:
>>> On Jo, 09 dec 21, 23:24:11, Marco Möller wrote:
>>> >
>>> > It's a pity that Debian cannot be flexible to offer more secure and
>>> > already
>>> > available binary versio
On 12/17/21 8:16 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:20:43PM -0800, David Newman wrote:
How to configure /etc/doas.conf so a non-root user gets root's PATH?
This works for me:
unicorn:~$ PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
unicorn:~$ cat /etc/doas.conf
permit setenv {
bullseye 11.1, 5.10.0-9-amd64, doas 6.8.1-2
How to configure /etc/doas.conf so a non-root user gets root's PATH?
Neither of these options work when attempting to execute a command in
/usr/sbin via doas (e.g., 'doas '):
permit nopass setenv {
PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr
n't
know what component is responsible for generating either the existing
checksum files or the .sign files for the ISOs. I guess it could be filed as a
"general" bug https://bugs.debian.org/general if nobody knows where it
should really be filed.
>>> On 06/15/2016 10:58 P
For CDs there is the checksum file and a signature file, one example is
https://mirrors.kernel.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/SHA256SUMS and
https://mirrors.kernel.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/SHA256SUMS.sign.
For net installers, there is a checksum file
https://mirrors.kernel.org/debi
Hi,
Coud we have a little more information? What wireless chipset is in
your laptop? What have you tried so far? Are you running stable,
testing or unstable?
Regards,
R.
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:16:58 +0100, Werner Otto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I installed debina on my Dell Latitide D50
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:07:34 -0400, Brian Pack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to have either the Tux logo or a bootsplash screen at boot. I've
> found a few pages that explain this, but each time I delve deeper I hit
> roadblocks. I've been referred to kernel patches at www.bootsplash.de,
> bu
Recipient of the infected attachment: Dave Webster\Inbox
Subject of the message: Spice girls' vocal concert
One or more attachments were deleted
Attachment STYLE.bat was Deleted for the following reasons:
Virus W32.Klez.H@mm was found.
<>
p "_ x11transSocketUNIXconnect : Can't connect errno =
111
The error message repeats 6 times
\ect\x11\xf86 config was not created, (then
loops back).
I have tried w/o graphics and it works, but I can't get any xgraphics to
work.
Help! I'm a newbie!
Jeff Newman
lity problems didn't help, either. I'd heard that Debian
was cleaner, so I was enthusiastic about trying it. But now, unless
someone can reassure me that slink is a whole lot more solid than
hamm, or someone can point me to some other distribution which really
is more solid than RedHat, I'm ready to decide that I didn't
appreciate RedHat nearly enough, and set about using RedHat 5.2 to
repair my poor comatose laptop.
Unhappily,
Bill Newman
"Please, please, don't ask about the laptop!" -- Dilbert
11 matches
Mail list logo