Re: Securing bind..

On Monday 31 December 2001 03:34, Michael D. Schleif wrote: > Because of that policy there are no precompiled packages of djbdns, because: "You may distribute a precompiled package if - installing your package produces exactly the same files, in exactl

Re: Securing bind..

On Monday 31 December 2001 01:29, Michael D. Schleif wrote: <...> > It is always amazing to me how *intelligent* people try to make their > point by taking other people's words out of context . . . <...> > > http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/faq/axfrdns.html#what i added the URL so i that everyone could look

Re: Securing bind..

On Sunday 30 December 2001 22:58, Russell Coker wrote: > 2.4.x kernels support the --bind option to mount which avoids the syslogd yep. linux v2.4.x and bind v9.x are easier to set up. debian has almost out-of-the box chroot solution. > I disagree with the supposed security benefits of disabling

Re: Securing bind..

On Sunday 30 December 2001 18:46, P Prince wrote: > The eaisest and most failsafe way to secure bind is to install djbdns. If you have nothing to say - do not speak. -- Configuration options for BIND are listed on http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/docs/config/ List of URL that might be usefull i