uot;From:"
and "(envelope-from)" are not the same.
What's the best way to handle this? Switch to Thunderbird or claws-mail?
--hobie
for the most convenient way to keep
an eye on his incoming e-mail for him. Mostly I use Mutt; he uses
claws-mail exclusively, so I'll need to remotely launch claws-mail and
have it retrieve latest e-mails.
Thanks in advance for any help on this.
--hobie
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 02:49:28 -0400
> "hobie of RMN" wrote:
>
> Hello hobie,
>
>>I guess I should be looking for a place to adjust settings of the window
>>manager..?
>
> That tends to adjust settings globally. If other windows haven't
> chan
, and Firefox's URL window now accommodates less of the text of
the URL.
I guess I should be looking for a place to adjust settings of the window
manager..? Is that a file on disk or is there a menu choice for this?
--hobie
>> Hello Hobie,
>>
>> On 2022-04-20 12:13 UTC+0200, hobie of RMN wrote:
>>> Hi, Folks -
>>
>>> With buster, I had done some tweaking to the boot command line in order
>>> to
>>> have a certain font size come up in the plain text console
> Hello Hobie,
>
> On 2022-04-20 12:13 UTC+0200, hobie of RMN wrote:
>> Hi, Folks -
>
>> With buster, I had done some tweaking to the boot command line in order to
>> have a certain font size come up in the plain text console windows.
Should I suspect that's st
weaking to the boot command line in order to
have a certain font size come up in the plain text console windows.
Should I suspect that's still present in grub and is for some reason
problematic under bullseye? Any tips, hints, suggestions, wild-eyed
speculations would be appreciated. :)
--hobie
arate issue and one that I do need to find
the answer to, but my question today is this: Is it possible to find the
original creation date-and-time on these files, or is it simply "gone with
the wind" at this point?
--hobie
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 01:41:54AM +, Andy Smith wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 07:13:16PM -0500, hobie of RMN wrote:
>> > He enters "fsck" or "fsck /dev/sda1", and in a short while gets fsck
>> > identifying it's version, and nothing e
> You might have to boot from a recovery CD image, such as a Debian live
> install image, or GParted Live. You can't actually run fsck on a drive
> while said drive is mounted.
Thank, Jeremy. But - is /dev/sda1 mounted at this point? Isn't it being
indicated to us that it can't be successfully m
My brother's Debian system suddenly says on attempt to boot, "/dev/sda1:
UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY:Runfsck manually", and, "inodes that were part of
a corrupted orphan linked list found."
He enters "fsck" or "fsck /dev/sda1", and in a short while gets fsck
identifying it's version, and nothing else
> hobie of RMN wrote:
>> Restating: I've installed the *.deb of Squirrelmail 1.4.23 SVN but don['t
>> see where to direct the browser in order to engage with it. Anyone
know...?
> The package should contain a configuration making it available via
http(s)://server.nam
> hobie of RMN wrote:
>
>> I have a server running Jessie (oldoldstable) that has had
>> Squirrelmail 1.4.2 (installed manually) on it for a very long time.
>> At some point, years ago, SM became confused by a change in
>> charactersets (UTC-8, is it?), leading t
1.4.3 from a Debian package - but I don't see where it's to be accessed
via browser. (??) Anyone know...?
--hobie
> On 2020-08-17 16:42, hobie of RMN wrote:
>> Hi, All -
>>
>> My brother has been issuing "mount /dev/sdb1" prior to backing up some
>> files to a second hard disk. He lately upgraded to 'testing', and it
>> appears (from result of running df
Hi, All -
My brother has been issuing "mount /dev/sdb1" prior to backing up some
files to a second hard disk. He lately upgraded to 'testing', and it
appears (from result of running df) that what the system now calls
/dev/sdb1 is what he has thought of as /dev/sda1, the system '/'
partition.
Tha
> On 14/7/20 10:26 am, hobie of RMN wrote:
>> Hi, Folks -
>>
>> I'm running Linux buster with xce4 desktop. Some applications come up
>> with font size too small for me to be able to read menu texts, etc.,
>> notably Libre programs and alsamixer, e
> On Mon, 13 Jul, 2020 at 20:26:57 -0400, hobie of RMN wrote:
>> Hi, Folks -
>>
>> I'm running Linux buster with xce4 desktop. Some applications come up
>> with font size too small for me to be able to read menu texts, etc.,
>> notably Libre programs and
Hi, Folks -
I'm running Linux buster with xce4 desktop. Some applications come up
with font size too small for me to be able to read menu texts, etc.,
notably Libre programs and alsamixer, etc. How can I ge3t larger fonts on
individual programs?
owser. It specifically
offers as a choice a "No Javascript" interface.
--hobie
> Hi folks,
> One of my gmail accounts is no longer accessible, not in links even with
> some JavaScript. Not in elinks with the same, and most of all, not via
> basic html in lynx.
> I
need at least a Linux 5.2 kernel
> while Debian 10 comes with 4.19.
>
> Cheers,
>Sven
How about GeForce 210...? Will the nouveau kernel module work for that or
are non-free drivers needed, on Debian 10?
--hobie
es the point of launching an xorg server; messages I've
been seeing are at the console.
> Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
>
> Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/
I was a big OS/2 fan, felt most unhappy when IBM chose not to support
non-commercial users any longer - but then that's how we've come to be
here together on this list, so ... :)
--hobie
Hi, Folks -
My amd64 stable ('buster') system has this on the motherboard:
AMD Kaveri [Radeon R7 Graphics]
In the "Psychedelic colors" thread we added this to the kernal commandline:
radeon.cik_support=0 amdgpu.cik_support=1
...which, in the long run, may not have been necessary, but it's stil
.?
I made a few tries at using the 'vga=' parameter talked about in docs on
the Web but I get the impression it's no longer used. (?)
As I said, I could get used to this and live contentedly with it. :) But
it seems odd not to be able easily to regain the console display I was so
used to for so many years.
--hobie
did this happen when 'buster' became the new 'stable'?
- How can I get an 80x25 console without 'nomodeset' in the cmdline?
Many thanks, Etienne, Alexander, Felix, Carl, Cindy Sue, and even bw, for
the ideas, brainstorms, and general patience and for walking with me on
this rather weird journey. :) If somehow we can get my 80x25 console
back, I think we could declare total victory on this one.
--hobie
> hobie, on 2019-07-20 :
>> Thanks. :) I have a faint memory of inserting 'nomodeset' long years
>> ago
>> in the interest of keeping my console screen at 80x25.
>>
>> cat /proc/cmdline
>> BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-[...]
> Hi,
>
> hobie, on 2019-07-19 :
>> dpkg -l | grep -iE 'amd-graphics|amdgpu|\|fglrx|radeon'
>> ii firmware-amd-graphics [...]
>> ii libdrm-amdgpu1:amd64 [...]
>> ii libdrm-radeon1:amd64 [...]
>> ii radeontop [
> hobie, on 2019-07-17:
>> I did the edit you suggested - changing the *.si to *.cik on that
second
>> readeon reference - but can't tell if anything was affected by it.
Psychedelic colors still return on leaving the desktop and coming back
to
>> it, and output of inxi -G
ted - changing the *.si to *.cik on that second
readeon reference - but can't tell if anything was affected by it.
Psychedelic colors still return on leaving the desktop and coming back to
it, and output of inxi -Gxxxz also appears the same:
Graphics:
Device-1: AMD Kaveri [Radeon R7 Graphics] vendor: ASUSTeK
driver: N/A bus ID: 00:01.0 chip ID: 1002:130f
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.4 driver: ati,vesa
unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,radeon resolution: 1600x900~N/A
OpenGL: renderer: llvmpipe (LLVM 7.0 128 bits)
v: 3.3 Mesa 18.3.6 compat-v: 3.1 direct render: Yes
Also, I've moved all files from /etc/modprobe.d to a backup directory;
their absence does not appear to have made any difference, either.
--hobie
> On 14.07.2019 4:20, Felix Miata wrote:
>> ho...@rumormillnews.com composed on 2019-07-13 18:07 (UTC-0400):
>>
>>> Thanks for the tip. Looks like a lot of information here but I don't
>>> really understand it. Xorg seems to have unloaded the radeon
>>> driver...?
>>> Graphics: Device-1: AMD Kav
>> >>>
>> >> Whoa! I tried to take screenshots so folks could see what I've
>> >> been trying to describe. Shot of normal screen turns out as
>> >> expected. Shot of
>> >> psychedelic screen turns out ... identical to shot of normal
>> >> screen!!! In
>> >> other words, what's present in graphi
> On Sb, 13 iul 19, 04:14:52, ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
>> >
>> Thanks -- the brand is AOC, connected via VGA cable
>
> I've seen such interesting effects when a VGA cable was not connected
> properly.
>
> You might want to check the cable and connection at both ends.
>
> Kind regards,
> Andre
> On 13.07.2019 13:14, ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
>>> On 13.07.2019 12:44, ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 20:22:55 -0400
> ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
>
>>> On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 17:52:43 -0400
>>> ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
>>>
Follow
> On 13.07.2019 12:44, ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
>>> On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 20:22:55 -0400
>>> ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
>>>
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 17:52:43 -0400
> ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
>
>> Following recent 'buster' move to 'stable' I got wild psychedelic
>> col
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 20:22:55 -0400
> ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
>
>>> On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 17:52:43 -0400
>>> ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
>>>
Following recent 'buster' move to 'stable' I got wild psychedelic
colors
on my XFCE desktop, making it nearly impossible to read anythin
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 20:22:55 -0400
> ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
>
>>> On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 17:52:43 -0400
>>> ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
>>>
Following recent 'buster' move to 'stable' I got wild psychedelic
colors
on my XFCE desktop, making it nearly impossible to read anythin
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 17:52:43 -0400
> ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
>
>>Following recent 'buster' move to 'stable' I got wild psychedelic colors
>>on my XFCE desktop, making it nearly impossible to read anything
>>on-screen.
>>
>>Normally I'd have display set for 1024x768. I've found I can get n
Following recent 'buster' move to 'stable' I got wild psychedelic colors
on my XFCE desktop, making it nearly impossible to read anything
on-screen.
Normally I'd have display set for 1024x768. I've found I can get normal
color on the GUI if I switch to 1600x900. However, even then, if I switch
t
Just a note of thanks to Joel, Andrei and Florent. :) I'll carry my
situation to the Audio users list and see what happens. Thanks for the
time and the courteous comments.
--hobie
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:56:12AM -0500, ho...@rumormillnews.com wrote:
>> > On Jo, 27 nov
gstreamer0.10- 0.10.31-3+nm amd64GStreamer plugin for PulseAudio
ii gstreamer1.0-p 1.4.4-2 amd64GStreamer plugin for PulseAudio
un libsdl1.2debia (no description available)
rc pulseaudio 2.0-3amd64PulseAudio sound server
un pulseaudio-eso
xer {
>> >> type dmix
>> >> ipc_key 1024
>> >> slave {
>> >> pcm "hw:0,0"
>> >> period_time 0
>> >> period_size 1024
>> >> buffer_size 4096
>> >> rate 44100
>> >> }
e hw
>> card 0
>>
>> -
>>
>> That made no meaningful change to the situation that I can see. How can
>> I
>> bring back the original ALSA behavior that served me so well for years?
>
> Do you know if pulseaudio is installed?
>
> dpkg -l | grep
behavior that served me so well for years?
Thanks in advance.
--hobie
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/c9c4e3b80378e1027ca1aae356b666b5.squir...@dragon.rumormillnews.com
43 matches
Mail list logo
