2007/6/15, Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Galevsky wrote:
> Many thanks for your comment and piece of code ;)
I would not want to have warned that the sky was falling without being
able to direct people to an underground bunker where they would be
safe. :-)
Ya, but not
Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Galevsky wrote:
> When user3 will launch the script later, he will get the user1
> permissions thanks to the setguid flag on the script, and will be able
Setuid scripts are a security hole! It is almost impossible to
prevent anyone from becoming the
with others (not the case here).
Gal'
2007/6/14, Galevsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thank you guys. Unfortunately, I cannot do that since I am not root
and can neither add group nor modify any /etc/*. That is the reason
why I was looking for a solution to change the user when executing the
sc
the file creation is done on behalf of
users and not of script owner. So file deletion. cannot run.
Gal'
2007/6/14, Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> Galevsky wrote:
> > How can I make the /home/user1/testfile belong to user1, the owner of
&g
Hi,
it is not the first time that i am facing this kind of problem, but I
never find out .
I decided to ask for some help.
Let's have 3 users: user1, user2 and user3
let's have a user1 script: /home/user1/script.sh
Script is:
#!/bin/bash
if [ -f '/home/user1/testfile' ]
then rm /home/use
Moreover, most of Windows users are running their home OS with the
administration rights all day long, they used to download and install
lots of non-opened freeware from the web.
Well, they just do lots of important/dangerous/admin tasks that should
be done normally with a lot of care. Linux le
2007/4/16, Marco Mandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
I have Debian Sarge running on a traditional partition. Now I am going to
make a clean install of edge. Before doing this I wish to migrate to LVM
an XEN. Is this realistic?
It is. We can even say "recommended" :o)
I was searching a lot but
2007/4/4, Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 11:09:57AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Michael Pobega wrote:
> >4) Rolling releases
> >
> >The only other distribution that has rolling releases (Or, no releases
> >at all) i
2007/4/4, Wei Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2) Is there any Debian specific LVM Howtos where I can learn debianized LVM?
3) How does LVM handle software upgrades in Debian?
For extra Debian specific stuff, I have no idea... I think there is
nothing special. Google gave me http://deb.riseup.net/sto
Michael Pobega wrote:
4) Rolling releases
The only other distribution that has rolling releases (Or, no releases
at all) is Gentoo, but Gentoo didn't have a strong stance on free
software or stability, and their developer base seems to be falling
apart, so I decided not to go with Gentoo (Plus t
2007/4/2, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Gal:
Just ask google to implement the list-reply button, it would no harm to you
or them.
I will ;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2007/4/1, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In the case of needing access from multiple systems, you should use
the usenet gateway and a newsreader.
nntp://linux.debian.user
or
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.user
nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.
2007/3/31, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Noobie stomps in, uses HTML mail (which you are *still* doing, and
still breaking the Code Of Conduct) and tells us not to follow an
internet standard, because no one else does it.
That's not appreciated.
Sorry for the previous html message, I thoug
Okay guys,
so, just to calm down,
I never told you what to do. I just faced twice the problem of answering to
the wrong addressee, and I saw that it happens sometimes to others. I
listened to your proposal of using a MUA, then argued that it was not
suiting my needs. (I don't think just about me
IMAP is not interesting for me at work, and there is reply-to-all feature
yet, so I am not sure the problem is coming from Google MUA, but from the
reply-to field instead. I read the Celejar link (thanks for him to have
brought it up) and tried to think that it was the reason why we don't have
it
I am forwarding previous answers and adding that I do not want to pop
these mails since I suscribed lots of ML, not only debian ones, and it is
more convenient for me to read&write from gmail than poping 3 times (work -
home - laptop) thousands of mails.
-- Forwarded message
Is it possible to know why the reply-to field is not set to
debian-user@lists.debian.org for each mail coming from the ML ? I am quite
sure you have discussed it before, but I am relatively new to this ML. When
you used not to take care about replying -it is the case in lots of ml, e.g.
gentoo'- i
To subscribe to or unsubscribe from a mailing list, please send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the word `subscribe' or `unsubscribe' as Subject.
*Please remember the -REQUEST part of the address.*
2007/3/25, les shartle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
please remove me from mailing list my email is [EM
It is what ?
moscow:~# lvdisplay
--- Logical volume ---
LV Name/dev/linux_data/home
VG Namelinux_data
LV UUIDqilIbL-454w-mQMD-Z9nj-Jzi9-eOl0-nUy8Cw
LV Write Accessread/write
LV Status available
# open 2
L
/etc/apt/sources.list conf file exactly.
You're right ;o)
2007/3/22, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if you are quite sure to have a good /etc/apt/sources.conf file, try to
> ping the server(s) before updating. But if it is a local problem, we
need
Hi,
if you are quite sure to have a good /etc/apt/sources.conf file, try to ping
the server(s) before updating. But if it is a local problem, we need more
info before going ahead as Joe said.
Gal'
2007/3/22, Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Texas Go
21 matches
Mail list logo
