https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/home
http://trousers.sourceforge.net/
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Today I have tried QTParted in Knoppix Live CD on the
drive which was used as a USB mass storage device in
the past. Unfortunately, it gives me a error message
saying "Critical error during ped_disk_new!" Could
anyone explain to me what's wrong with the disk?
The disk was mounted by Knoppix as /
For some reason, I did not receive the following
message and I found it out from Google search.
To be hornest, I'm hesitate to be instered in this
one. The reasons are:
1. The program is pretty new and unlik Knoppix there
is no official review for that yet.
2. The release date is a bit controve
For some reason, I did not receive the following
message and I found it out from Google search.
To be hornest, I'm hesitate to be instered in this
one. The reasons are:
1. The program is pretty new and unlik Knoppix there
is no official review for that yet.
2. The release date is a bit controve
:27 -0700, formless void
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I believe that my PC has a hidden partition which
> is
> > unvisible under Windows and other OS. I was going
> to
> > install Debian-based OS on my machine. Since this
> > problem bothers me, I'm reluct
Thanks Nyizsa, for the valuable information and I may
try that.
--- Nyizsnyik Ferenc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 03:27 -0700, formless void
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I believe that my PC has a hidden partition which
> is
> > unvis
Hi,
I believe that my PC has a hidden partition which is
unvisible under Windows and other OS. I was going to
install Debian-based OS on my machine. Since this
problem bothers me, I'm reluctant to do it untill it
is solved. Is there any linux package which can
restore or view the hidden partiti
I finally found that W3C has got
User Agent Accessibility Guidelines at
http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-USERAGENT/
Now my question is how authenticative W3C is? Why am
I asking this? Because, seting up a standard is one
thing and getting vendors to implement is another.
It seems to me that the stand
I finally found that W3C has got
User Agent Accessibility Guidelines at
http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-USERAGENT/
Now my question is how authenticative W3C is? Why am
I asking this? Because, seting up a standard is one
thing and getting vendors to implement is another.
It seems to me that the stand
I finally found that W3C has got
User Agent Accessibility Guidelines at
http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-USERAGENT/
Now my question is how authenticative W3C is? Why am
I asking this? Because, seting up a standard is one
thing and getting vendors to implement is another.
It seems to me that the stand
--- Alex Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So you are happy with your GPS system in your
> car
> > > which sends the data to the government
> intellegence
> > > agent Hah?
> > >
> >
> > If they can get the data from my GPS, why not just
> use the satellites
> > which can photograph li
> >
> > What about the case that you bought a car which
> has
> > got a hiden camera to trace your route. Would you
> > yell out? The same as true, if broswer doesn't
> have a
> > standrds, it can be very intrusive to the users
> >
>
> All I can say is, "wow." I have never read anything
> th
>
> All I can say is, "wow." I have never read anything
> that made so little
> sense.
>
> -Roberto
>
So you are happy with your GPS system in your car
which sends the data to the government intellegence
agent Hah?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired o
>Comparing auto specifications to what are free
> products in a
> totally unrelated discipline, is impractical and
> ludicrous, and a feeble
> attempt to be disingenuous.
>
To personal use, browsers are free but what about to
institutional use, are they free as well? Has
Netscape not required any
--- Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 15 May 2006 04:48, formless void wrote:
>
> > >
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:W3C_standards
> > >
> > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xhtml1-20020801/
> >
> > Don't
Let's take an example of cars
One normally can find either a standard or a
specification of a car brand in a standard bureau.
Whether it is Ford, Toyota or BMW, one always can find
it. Where is an equivalent for the browser?
--- formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- S
--- Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.webstandards.org/
>
Hoooh hoooh...could you tell me if the site is newly
created or existing site?
The front page even doesn't tell when the page is
created. Just by looking at this, I can tell the site
is not created by a prfessional web des
Hi My Dear Debianist,
Where I can find a debian package which prevents
firefox browser to reload the pages that I visited?
Another strange thing happen to me is that I'm unable
to directly visit google when I start my internet
connection freshly and has to do detour which means I
have to go to an
--- Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are browser standards. And there are browsers
> that comply and
> others who don't. Guess which ones!
>
> Andrei
>
>
> --
Would you please be able to point me out where I can
find such standards at
www.iso.org
or W3C at
www.w3.org
More thoughts are coming to my mind are:
When we raise the web usability issue, actually there
are two aspects need to be addressed, one from web
design perspective and another from browser
compatibility perspecitve. Currently, the industry is
mainly focusing on the web design standardisation but
Also, the follow post elaborates my point too
http://forum.xandros.com/viewtopic.php?t=23521&sid=f697ca26a02e4937588074fedb00302d
--- formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > I ca
--- Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I can install an Extension to FireFox that will make
> it appears as ANY
> BROWSER I TELL IT TO SAY IT IS. It is called
> UserAgent Switcher.
>
> I can also tell "curl" to be anything I want it to
> be.
>
> I can and have completely changed the
Who cares Konquerer? But people do care about big
brother's conduct though
--- Andrew Sackville-West
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 03:19:06AM -0700, formless
> void wrote:
> > You see when I make allegations on IT industry, I
> mean
> > i
You see when I make allegations on IT industry, I mean
it.
Look these Dishonest Browsers
http://www.samspublishing.com/library/content.asp?b=STY_JavaScript_24_hours&seqNum=151
--- Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> formless void wrote:
> > Some of the debian packages ar
education system
in which some of the examiners have to come from
outside.
--- formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Back to what?
>
> I'm talking about the software and package
> validation
> for which I believe that IT industry has not take
> enough concern
I believe that Microsoft its interal quality control
system is very strong but the product has to be QA-ed
by an external representativ of the authority
--- formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Back to what?
>
> I'm talking about the software and package
> validatio
nical advancement
along with the concept of integrating validation
technology
--- "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> formless void wrote:
> > Internal Fact Sheet is the one I can view from
> Xandros
> > Network. At the moment, my XN is not working an
PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> formless void wrote:
> > --- Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>"Trust the Source, Luke!"
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > How can I trust it without reason but with so many
> > doubts?
> >
--- Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Trust the Source, Luke!"
>
>
How can I trust it without reason but with so many
doubts?
For example the internal fact sheet of desktop-base
(0.3.15) doesn't have depends details and make one
wondering if it is authentic or pathetic. However,
the exter
Thanks Carl for the reply.
Some of the debian packages are not quite sincere and
I need to remove them before I can trust them.
--- Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 07:09:39PM -0700, formless
> void wrote:
> > from the system?
>
> I ten
from the system?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The street seller may
not get caught. However, do you think the government
will ignore the case and let it happen twice?
--- Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There is no excuse for volunatary org
The street seller may
not get caught. However, do you think the government
will ignore the case and let it happen twice?
--- Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There is no excuse for volunatary org
The street seller may
not get caught. However, do you think the government
will ignore the case and let it happen twice?
--- Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There is no excuse for volunatary org
The street seller may
not get caught. However, do you think the government
will ignore the case and let it happen twice?
--- Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There is no excuse for volunatary org
--- "B.Hoffmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 15:50 -0700, formless void
> wrote:
> > LinuxWorld has got a business registration number
> > (ISSN) to show that they are in business
> >
> > Where is the equivalent from Distr
I'm bothering with this site, as I mentioed that there
is no registration details with it's governing body
--- Ladislav Bodnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 17 April 2006 07:00, formless void wrote:
> > Do they tell you how they did stats? Do you know
indicator works. Do you know
how distrowatch indicator works?
--- "B.Hoffmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 16:49 +0300, Andrei Popescu
> wrote:
> > formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
LinuxWorld has got a business registration number
(ISSN) to show that they are in business
Where is the equivalent from DistroWatch?
--- Ladislav Bodnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sunday 16 April 2006 21:19, formless void wrote:
>
> > I can pretty know who is Linux
Well, if this is the case, then Debian should put its
disclaimer some where to state that their package is
not responsible for its clone and only for the
origrinal. Where is the disclaimer as such?
--- Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> formless void <[EMAIL PROTE
he/she is doing?
--- Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 04:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
> formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Andrei,
> >
> > Your message is voicing like
> >
> > "Do not use other Operating Sy
--- Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 04:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
> formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Xandros has the reputation of 2006 award winning
> from
> > Linux World and this is true if you google it
> &
--- Linas Žvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> formless void wrote:
>
> > Xandros has the reputation of 2006 award winning
> from
> > Linux World and this is true if you google it
>
> How this is relevant?
Well, it is a proof of their credibility, isn
ded message attached.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com --- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 02:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This package is the stable version but has got this
> kin
bian need to issue an digital
signature to its devleoper to make sure that their
packages are authentic
--- Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 02:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
> formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This package is the stable vers
This package is the stable version but has got this
kind of bug. Has anyone else tried on that to see if
it comes with the same problem that I have got?
--- Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 20:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
> formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The package xfree86-common (4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1)
[security] is not relavant to the fact sheet at
http://packages.debian.org/stable/x11/xfree86-common
When I was trying to do installation under Xandros
Network, it mentions the package as hpijs instead of
xfree86. All the dependents are print sc
Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com --- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 06:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you know how to get Synaptic work with KDE, Andrei?
>
> I installed it but am u
ction around
http://mail.yahoo.com --- Begin Message ---
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 17:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
formless void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the help, Kevin
>
> I'm using Xandros Network to install the .deb file.
> The beauty of the utility is that after each
l has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com --- Begin Message ---
formless void wrote:
> Has anyone noticed that this file is buggy?
>
> I'm using Xandros desktop and have tried to install it
> onto my system. However, it asks for lyx-qt and
> lyx-xforms. Wh
Hi,
Has anyone noticed that this file is buggy?
I'm using Xandros desktop and have tried to install it
onto my system. However, it asks for lyx-qt and
lyx-xforms. When I tried to install the lyx-qt and
lyx-xforms, they were asking for lyx-common.
I have noticed that when lyx-common asked for l
51 matches
Mail list logo
