> Hi,
> When I ssh in to my debian potato system and try to do something like vi,
> or dselect, the screen messes up. For example, the vi status line occurs
> at the top of the screen, and I can't see the line the cursor is currently
> on. In dselect the same type things happen, stuff gets printe
Robert Rambled,
> I´ve simply set it in the components:
> [waldner:~/Mail] egrep Waldner *comp*
> components:From: Robert Waldner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> distcomps:Resent-From: Robert Waldner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> forwcomps:From: Robert Waldner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> rcvdistcomps:Resent-From: Robert
After months of on and off poking, I'm still stuck. I've
tried reading assorted fm's, but get lost along the way.
I need to figure out how to get mh (or nmh) to automatically
include a specified From: line whenever it mails from my
account (or, even better, to get it to to include this in the
t
I have had more system hangs in the last two weeks than in the last four
years put together . . . (OK, so that make s 2 :)
The first incident was loading (well, attempting to load) an excessively
large file into beav (a binary file editor). 1G file, 160Mb memory.
It ran out of memory, and even
I know I"ve been through this before, but this didn't come up on my
install last year (which worked fine).
I can read usenet just fine, but when I try to post, I get
inews: No valid newsgroups in alt.folklore.computers
--which happens to be the group I"m reading.
I'm not running a newserve
--
cc:
Subject: my .signature is gone in nmh
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I've noticed that my .signature is no longer included, either from the
command line or when using exmh. It still seems to be there:
fac13pts/0:hawk>ls -l .signature
-rwx--
cc: David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, hawk
Subject: Re: ppp install failing (loopback?)
In-Reply-To: Message from hawk
of "Tue, 29 Aug 2000 13:06:07 EDT." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plai
ntent-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
john jabbed,
> dochawk writes:
> > What does "serial line is looped back" mean?
> It means that pppd is seeing its own LCP packets coming back. This usually
> happens when the host on the other end wants to see more text befo
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I've managed once more to get the base distribution onto the kdis
machine, and I think that this one was the biggest fight I"ve had in
five years of debian . . . Theres' a cute bug that *can* happen, but
I'm not sure what cau
jessi jumbled,
> actually, last time i checked, the 2.4 kernel had the same problem. i am
> hoping pre9 fixes them. Typically, with pre8 (AFAIK) if you throw load at
> the machine, the eerpro drivers "wig" out.
This is from the debian "test-5" version. I can't stay up more than a
couple of minu
This has come up a couple of times, including by me.
I've install 2.4, and it seems to solve the flaky connection problem
from the eepro card in my machine (i'd previously needed a keepup
script to force-reload the network every few seconds.
hawk
--
> Has anyone used woody for mission critical stuff? I know some people run
> woody-based web servers, eg, but I haven't.
I used to run the unstable branches. Prior to 1.1, this was kind of
necessary :)
However, somewhere arround 98, iirc, it became impractical. With
regular updated, I coul
Ray rote,
> I know that when 2.2 installs in is emacs19. But of course you know that
> as soon as you remove emacs RMS sends large men to your house to break
>your knees. :) I like emacs but it is big.
Yes, but in the true emacs anti-unix tradtion, they don't stop at doing
one thing well, but i
Oswald opined,
> well ... i don't remember their names. i found some of them by searching
> freshmeat.net and doing a generic web search for "linux disk editor"
*DOH!*
Now I feel foolish :)
> or
> something like that. i did not bookmark them, as they all were not very
> satisfactory ... :-(
> > yikes, I can do without the gory details :) does this mean that once I
> > find a block of a tar, I can start extracting, even if it wasn't the
> > middle?
> you mean "even if it wasn't the START?", right?
> the answer is yes. just verified this.
yes. Thanks.
> > And now that I think of
chris chryed,
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 02:14:56PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > yikes, I can do without the gory details :) does this mean that once I
> > find a block of a tar, I can start extracting, even if it wasn't the
> > middle?
> You want to find the first block of the tar. I
to: du
reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-user@lists.debian.org
from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: finding a tarball on a fat-less fat partition--disk editor?
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 15 Sep 2000 19:28:34 EDT."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PR
17 matches
Mail list logo
