Greetings Theo & Sean,
Maybe my experience will help some
On 19-12-01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Theo!
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 02:44:47PM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
> > > save yourself the headache with converting rpms into debs, and just
> > > download the netscape installer off of
Greetings all,
I'm posting a request to this list in regards to Lyx. I won't post the
specific problem as yet (as this is a Lyx problem, not necessarily
dependent on Debian).
But, is there a Lyx guru out there that would have 5 minutes or so to guide
a newbie through the jungle.
I've RTFM, both
Greetings,
I didn't receive a response to yesterday's query about ~killing~ ipmasq.
However, I imagine that my post was lost in the ruch of repeat messages sent
via the list today.
To sum up my previous post ...
I installed apt-get install'd 'ipmasq' in a knee jerk response to all the
recent sec
Greetings dman and Stephan,
Thanks for the help ... *BHOKB* ... I must have read that entry 5 or 6
times, yet the 'Note:' never made it to my conscious processing. I really have
to have
a chat with my various sub, non and altered consciousness's.
C. Masters
- Forwarded message from cmasters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 18:54:17 -0400
From: cmasters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Difficulties w/ ipmasq]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D
Trying this again,
As you can see ... typing out this address every time made me so tired I
forgot the 'o' in 'org'.
- Forwarded message from cmasters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 19:04:45 -0400
From: cmasters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAI
working here :-)
- Forwarded message from cmasters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 18:52:37 -0400
From: cmasters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debuser
Subject: Difficulties w/ ipmasq
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Greetings,
I hope that someone cah help me with thi
Greetings dman
On 01-11-30, dman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 12:38:57PM -0400, cmasters wrote:
... snip a few bits ...
>
> Hmm, interesting. Do you have gads of stuff in
> /var/spool/mail/ ? That would also explain why stuff that
> wasn't directed at your usernam
Greetings all,
Firstly ... *executing full ceremonial k'ou t'ou*
Thank you ~incredibly~ to all that helped. Special thanks to Kurt, Carel,
dman, Greg, Alan, and Paolo. Your combined responses of "compare your xxx to
mine", "stick with it, it'll come", and especially "I was once there too
...
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 07:37:29PM -0800, Kurt Lieber wrote:
> On Thursday 29 November 2001 07:05 pm, cmasters wrote:
>
> > Hope you don't mind the interruption. You may have noticed my slew of
> > postings about difficulties with sorting mail. I read your reponse to mean
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 10:49:11PM -0500, Greg Lopp wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:19:35PM -0400, cmasters wrote:
... snip of log ...
>
> The preceding log leads us to believe that the message has been
> delivered to your smtp daemon (exim). The next step is not to
> look in
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 11:42:14AM -0800, Kurt Lieber wrote:
> On Thursday 29 November 2001 11:22 am, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> > That's something I've wondered about for a while... I've found
> > exim's .forward filtering to be more than adequate for anything I've
> > ever wanted to do (and a lot m
Greetings all,
My recent difficulties with printer and mail setup have led to to the point
where I simply must express my thoughts on "RTFM".
1. I'm beginning that this should be the credo to linux use. Which would be
fine if reading the "fine" manual didn't imply previous knowledge of the OS
or
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 02:28:36AM +0100, Stephen Rueger wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 06:41:01PM -0600, John Patton wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:08:34PM -0400, cmasters wrote:
>
> > I don't know what getmail does, but fetchmail will gather your mail
> > f
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 06:41:01PM -0600, John Patton wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:08:34PM -0400, cmasters wrote:
> > The problem with this is that often, I have 300+ emails to then sort through
> > one by one. I imnagine I could use those nifty 'save/send/folde
Greetings Carel,
Attached you will find a yet again revised copy of my fetchmailrc. rest
assured ~all~ usernames and pwords are strictly alphanumeric. I've also
included a copy of the most recent logfile. I opted for fetchall rather than
keep, as I am continuing to run getmail throughout this tria
lt; +OK mail-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca POP3 server (Post.Office v3.5.3
release 223 with ZPOP version 1.0 ID# 0-72041U145000L145000S0V35) ready Thu, 29
Nov 2001 17:36:37 -0400
fetchmail: POP3> USER cmasters
fetchmail: POP3< +OK Password required for cmasters
fetchmail: POP3> PASS *
fetchmail: POP3< +OK
Greetings Glyn,
I compared the exim.conf that you included (thanx muchly) to the one I have
and they are ~identical~ in all respects other than local domain variables.
My variables are correct for this system. I did notice mention of a
'.forward' file that is to be referenced, however fetchmail an
Greetings,
Although I'm sure my reasons are not unique, I thought I'd express them so
that perhaps they will explain my frustration at getting adequate mail
processing.
Previous to my current attempts, I (like many others) used mozilla and/or
kmail to read/sort/file/save my mail. Quite frankly, I
Greetings,
After sending out my last posting on email problems, I thought of checking
my exim.conf. I hadn't done this before, as I understood that the process
was fetchmail -> procmail -> mutt. Maybe it isn't so.
Anywho, assuming that exim sits between fetchmail and procmail, I have some
questio
Greetings,
I absorbed and applied the following advice given by respondents to the
previous thread:
1. Checked to make sure that referenced directories existed and had proper
permissions [YES]
2. Simplified my recipe as follows:
:0:
in-testing
3. Stopped 'getmail' and invoked
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:03:07AM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:18:35PM -0400, cmasters wrote:
> > Could someone please explain why fetchmail/procmail combo continues to
> > reject ~any~ messages not expressly addressed to me (aka my Return addy).
&g
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 09:58:31PM -0500, dman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:18:35PM -0400, cmasters wrote:
> | Could someone please explain why fetchmail/procmail combo continues to
> | reject ~any~ messages not expressly addressed to me (aka my Return addy).
> | I've at
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 09:43:58PM -0500, Warren A. Layton wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:18:35PM -0400, cmasters wrote:
> > Could someone please explain why fetchmail/procmail combo continues to
> > reject ~any~ messages not expressly addressed to me (aka my Return addy).
&g
mime-version status x-status message-id
#ignore sender references return-path lines
# Changes message editor from "vi" to "jed"
set editor=jed
# Set "From" address variable to reflect current ISP account
#set from='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
set realname=cmast
Greetings,
No problem. I hoped that slogging through man's would serve a purpose other
than burning out my eyes. I'm almost tempted to write some version(s) in
~clear~ unambiguous language for newbies (like myself).
Glad my solution helped
C. Masters
Greetings,
Now that I have my printer running properly, I'm trying to tackle the
problem of mail delivery. I've installed fetchmail, procmail, and exim, but
I have yet to make them interact properly. For the moment I am using
~getmail~ (a fetchmail replacement) to poll my ISP and deliver my mail i
Greetings,
Well they say that those who try ... eventually will. Through a process of
elimination, I reasoned that my "server" (what I affectionately refer to as
my COMPUTER) was not accepting requests for printing. After pondering and
delving further into the "CUPS Software Administrator's Tool"
that error should read "server-error-service-unavailable". Still not finding
this error in the Docs.
C. Masters
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 03:04:01AM -0400, C-Cose Masters wrote:
Hello again,
Having just attempted to print a message from Mutt, I received the error
"service-error-server-unavailable". I haven't been able to find ~that~
particular error in any of the FAQ's.
> Greetings,
>
> I'm having difficul
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 11:46:14PM -0400, cmasters wrote:
> - Forwarded message from root -
>
> The following excerpt from system logs has me puzzled. As you can see
> Sendmail is attempting to verify my domain name from (what I assume is) a
> DNS server. The truly puzzlin
- Forwarded message from root -
The following excerpt from system logs has me puzzled. As you can see
Sendmail is attempting to verify my domain name from (what I assume is) a
DNS server. The truly puzzling thing is that I expressly ~unchose~ DNS
queries when setting up Sendmail, in addit
33 matches
Mail list logo
